Suppr超能文献

腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术后不良事件危险因素的专家德尔菲共识:国际腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术风险分层(IRIS-EVAR)工作组的一级研究

An Expert Delphi Consensus on Risk Factors for Adverse Events After Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair: Tier 1 Study From the International RIsk Stratification in EVAR (IRIS-EVAR) Working Group.

作者信息

Talbot Adam B, Schermerhorn Marc L, Forbes Thomas L, Golledge Jonathan, Verhagen Hence J M, Torella Francesco, Antoniou George A

机构信息

Manchester Vascular Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.

Divisions of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

J Endovasc Ther. 2024 Jul 31:15266028241267014. doi: 10.1177/15266028241267014.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Tier 1 of the International RIsk Stratification in EndoVascular Aneurysm Repair (IRIS-EVAR) project aimed to identify important risk factors for adverse events following endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Initially, the steering committee proposed a number of risk factors for adverse events following EVAR. A Delphi consensus was performed as expert panelists were presented with risk factors and provided the opportunity to propose additional risk factors during the process. Experts in EVAR completed an online survey via 3 structured rounds. The first round opened in July 2022, and the third round closed in December 2022. Panelists rated risk factors using a 4-point Likert scale. Consensus was defined as >70% of participants agreeing/strongly agreeing or disagreeing/strongly disagreeing with a statement in each round.

RESULTS

Thirty-five panelists from 12 countries completed the 3 rounds of surveys. Of a total of 64 individual risk factors assessed by the panelists, 37 (58%) had consensus that they were important for adverse events following EVAR. Risk factors were stratified in 4 domains: 14 (38%) were related to preoperative anatomy, 3 (8%) related to the aortic device selection, 8 (22%) related to the procedure performance, and 12 (32%) related to postoperative surveillance. Factors with the highest consensus in each domain were as follows: proximal aortic neck length <15 mm (98% consensus), anatomy non-compliant with instructions for use (94% consensus), length of achieved proximal aortic neck post implantation <10 mm (98% consensus), and non-satisfactory seal at landing or overlapping zones/sac expansion/kink or stenosis (100% consensus each), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinically important risk factors for adverse events after EVAR were identified via expert consensus. These factors will be used to develop an expert consensus-informed risk stratification and surveillance strategies.

CLINICAL IMPACT

This is the first study to apply an in-depth Delphi methodology to achieve an expert consensus on risk factors for adverse events after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Important risk factors were stratified in 4 domains: preoperative anatomy (14 factors), aortic device (3 factors), EVAR procedure (8 factors), and postoperative surveillance (12 factors). This study will potentially influence future clinical practice by providing evidence informed by experts regarding predictors of adverse events following EVAR that can be taken into account during decision making and developing post-EVAR surveillance strategies. These findings will inform a risk stratification tool for everyday use by vascular surgeons.

摘要

目的

血管内动脉瘤修复术国际风险分层(IRIS-EVAR)项目的第一阶段旨在确定血管内动脉瘤修复术(EVAR)后不良事件的重要风险因素。

材料与方法

最初,指导委员会提出了一些EVAR后不良事件的风险因素。进行了德尔菲共识法,因为专家小组成员被展示了风险因素,并在此过程中有机会提出其他风险因素。EVAR专家通过三轮结构化在线调查完成了一项在线调查。第一轮于2022年7月开始,第三轮于2022年12月结束。小组成员使用4点李克特量表对风险因素进行评分。共识定义为每轮中超过70%的参与者同意/强烈同意或不同意/强烈不同意某一陈述。

结果

来自12个国家的35名小组成员完成了三轮调查。在小组成员评估的总共64个个体风险因素中,37个(58%)达成共识,认为它们对EVAR后的不良事件很重要。风险因素分为4个领域:14个(38%)与术前解剖结构有关,3个(8%)与主动脉装置选择有关,8个(22%)与手术操作有关,12个(32%)与术后监测有关。每个领域中达成共识程度最高的因素如下:近端主动脉颈长度<15mm(98%达成共识)、解剖结构不符合使用说明(94%达成共识)、植入后近端主动脉颈长度<10mm(98%达成共识)以及着陆或重叠区域/瘤囊扩张/扭结或狭窄处密封不满意(各100%达成共识)。

结论

通过专家共识确定了EVAR后不良事件的临床重要风险因素。这些因素将用于制定基于专家共识的风险分层和监测策略。

临床影响

这是第一项应用深入德尔菲方法就血管内动脉瘤修复术(EVAR)后不良事件的风险因素达成专家共识的研究。重要风险因素分为4个领域:术前解剖结构(14个因素)、主动脉装置(3个因素)、EVAR手术(8个因素)和术后监测(12个因素)。本研究可能会影响未来的临床实践,通过提供专家提供的关于EVAR后不良事件预测因素的证据,在决策和制定EVAR后监测策略时可以考虑这些因素。这些发现将为血管外科医生日常使用的风险分层工具提供信息。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验