• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

近期最高法院裁决对皮肤科招聘渠道的影响。

The Impact of the Recent Supreme Court Ruling on the Dermatology Recruitment Pipeline.

机构信息

Dr. Flamm is from the Department of Dermatology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York. Dr. Sharma is from the Department of Dermatology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, and Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Ohio. Dr. Nambudiri is from the Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and the Department of Dermatology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

Cutis. 2024 Jun;113(6):243-245. doi: 10.12788/cutis.1037.

DOI:10.12788/cutis.1037
PMID:39082984
Abstract

The 2023 ruling by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) on the use of race-based criteria in college admissions may have implications for the selection of individuals into the dermatology workforce. This article highlights the impact of these decisions at the undergraduate, medical school, and graduate medical education levels, as well as within the field of dermatology.

摘要

美国最高法院 (SCOTUS) 2023 年关于在大学招生中使用基于种族的标准的裁决可能会对皮肤科劳动力中个人的选拔产生影响。本文强调了这些决策在本科、医学院和研究生医学教育水平以及皮肤科领域的影响。

相似文献

1
The Impact of the Recent Supreme Court Ruling on the Dermatology Recruitment Pipeline.近期最高法院裁决对皮肤科招聘渠道的影响。
Cutis. 2024 Jun;113(6):243-245. doi: 10.12788/cutis.1037.
2
Privileges, Immunities, and Affirmative Action in Medical Education.医学教育中的特权、豁免权和平权行动。
J Law Health. 2024;37(3):214-224.
3
How the SCOTUS Affirmative Action Ruling Could Affect Medical Schools and Health Care.美国最高法院的平权行动裁决如何影响医学院和医疗保健。
JAMA. 2023 Aug 8;330(6):492-494. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.13603.
4
The consequences of premature abandonment of affirmative action in medical school admissions.医学院招生中过早放弃平权行动的后果。
JAMA. 2003 Mar 5;289(9):1143-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.9.1143.
5
U.S. Supreme Court Decision Implications for Affirmative Action in Medical School Admissions.美国最高法院的裁决对医学院招生中平权行动的影响。
Acad Med. 2024 Apr 1;99(4):349-350. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005617. Epub 2023 Dec 28.
6
Raising the bar on achieving racial diversity in higher education: the United States Supreme Court's decision in Fisher v University of Texas.提高高等教育中实现种族多样性的标准:美国最高法院在 Fisher v. University of Texas 一案中的裁决。
Acad Med. 2013 Dec;88(12):1792-4. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000022.
7
Affirmative action in medical school admissions.医学院招生中的平权行动。
JAMA. 2003 Jun 18;289(23):3085; author reply 3086-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.23.3085-a.
8
Affirmative action in medical school admissions.医学院招生中的平权行动。
JAMA. 2003 Jun 18;289(23):3085-6; author reply 3086-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.23.3085-b.
9
Affirmative action in medical school admissions.医学院招生中的平权行动。
JAMA. 2003 Jun 18;289(23):3084; author reply 3086-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.23.3084-a.
10
A comparison of statistical criteria for setting optimally discriminating MCAT and GPA thresholds in medical school admissions.医学院招生中设定最佳区分度的医学院入学考试(MCAT)和平均绩点(GPA)阈值的统计标准比较。
Teach Learn Med. 2005 Spring;17(2):149-58. doi: 10.1207/s15328015tlm1702_9.