• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者的视野检查体验及障碍因素对青光眼的影响。

Patient Experience and Barriers to the Visual Field Test for Glaucoma.

机构信息

Brisbane North Eye Centre, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia, Save Sight Institute.

出版信息

J Glaucoma. 2024 Nov 1;33(11):835-840. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000002477. Epub 2024 Aug 1.

DOI:10.1097/IJG.0000000000002477
PMID:39083020
Abstract

PRCIS

There are significant mental, physical, and perceptual challenges in patients undergoing visual field testing, particularly in the elderly population with glaucoma.

PURPOSE

To quantitatively and qualitatively investigate patient experiences of undergoing visual field testing.

METHODS

This cross-sectional, mixed-methods study involves adult patients attending a private outpatient ophthalmology clinic in Brisbane, Australia. Participant experiences of visual field testing were assessed using a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS), followed by face-to-face semi-structured interviews. Outcome data comprised of VAS scores (1-100) and thematically analyzed verbatim notes.

RESULTS

Of the 152 participants [M:F 79 (52.0%):73 (48.0%)], the age group with the highest proportion of participants was 71-80 years [n=56 (36.8%)], and most had a primary ocular diagnosis of glaucoma [n=107 (70.4%)]. The mean VAS score for visual field testing experience was 60.45 (SD=30.38). The mean VAS score of participants with glaucoma was significantly lower than that of participants without glaucoma [55.34 (31.13) vs. 72.67 (25.04); P <0.05]. Prevalent themes regarding participant experiences of visual field testing consisted of concentration difficulties, intra-test and peri-test anxiety, skepticism in the testing process, and physical discomfort. Age, sex, and mean visual field index did not influence participant experiences of visual field testing.

CONCLUSIONS

Mental and physical barriers to visual field testing tolerability were identified in a predominantly elderly population with glaucoma. Our findings highlight the importance of addressing patient concerns and apprehensions regarding visual field testing and emphasize the value of patient-initiated breaks, particularly for individuals experiencing concentration difficulties and physical discomfort.

摘要

PRCIS

接受视野检查的患者会面临明显的心理、身体和感知挑战,尤其是患有青光眼的老年人群。

目的

定量和定性地调查患者接受视野检查的体验。

方法

本横断面混合方法研究纳入了澳大利亚布里斯班一家私人门诊眼科诊所的成年患者。使用 100 毫米视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估参与者的视野检查体验,随后进行面对面半结构式访谈。结果数据包括 VAS 评分(1-100)和主题分析的逐字记录。

结果

在 152 名参与者中[男:女 79(52.0%):73(48.0%)],年龄组中参与者比例最高的是 71-80 岁[56 名(36.8%)],大多数人主要诊断为青光眼[107 名(70.4%)]。视野检查体验的平均 VAS 评分为 60.45(SD=30.38)。青光眼患者的平均 VAS 评分明显低于非青光眼患者[55.34(31.13)比 72.67(25.04);P <0.05]。参与者关于视野检查体验的普遍主题包括注意力困难、测试中和测试期间的焦虑、对测试过程的怀疑以及身体不适。年龄、性别和平均视野指数均未影响参与者的视野检查体验。

结论

在以青光眼为主的老年人群中,发现了对视野检查耐受性的心理和身体障碍。我们的研究结果强调了关注患者对视野检查的担忧和顾虑的重要性,并强调了患者发起的休息的价值,特别是对于那些存在注意力困难和身体不适的个体。

相似文献

1
Patient Experience and Barriers to the Visual Field Test for Glaucoma.患者的视野检查体验及障碍因素对青光眼的影响。
J Glaucoma. 2024 Nov 1;33(11):835-840. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000002477. Epub 2024 Aug 1.
2
How Do Patients Feel About Visual Field Testing? Analysis of Subjective Perception of Standard Automated Perimetry.患者对视野检查有何感受?标准自动视野计主观感知分析。
Semin Ophthalmol. 2021 Feb 17;36(1-2):35-40. doi: 10.1080/08820538.2021.1884270. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
3
Visual Field Testing Frequency and Associations in Children With Glaucoma.青光眼患儿的视野测试频率及其相关性研究。
J Glaucoma. 2024 Jul 1;33(7):499-504. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000002406. Epub 2024 Apr 23.
4
Threshold Automated Perimetry of the Full Visual Field in Patients With Glaucoma With Mild Visual Loss.阈值全视野自动视野计在轻度视力丧失的青光眼患者中的应用。
J Glaucoma. 2019 Nov;28(11):997-1005. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001372.
5
Quantification and Predictors of Visual Field Variability in Healthy, Glaucoma Suspect, and Glaucomatous Eyes Using SITA-Faster.使用SITA-Faster技术对健康眼睛、青光眼疑似患者眼睛和青光眼患者眼睛的视野变异性进行量化及预测因素分析
Ophthalmology. 2024 Jun;131(6):658-666. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2023.12.018. Epub 2023 Dec 16.
6
Comparing a Head-Mounted Smartphone Visual Field Analyzer to Standard Automated Perimetry in Glaucoma: A Prospective Study.头戴式智能手机视野分析仪与青光眼标准自动视野计比较的前瞻性研究。
J Glaucoma. 2024 Oct 1;33(10):742-747. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000002452. Epub 2024 Jun 17.
7
Octopus 900 Automated Kinetic Perimetry versus Standard Automated Static Perimetry in Glaucoma Practice.章鱼 900 自动化动态视野计与青光眼标准自动静态视野计的比较。
Curr Eye Res. 2021 Jan;46(1):83-95. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2020.1786133. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
8
Comparison of 24-2 Faster, Fast, and Standard Programs of Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm of Humphrey Field Analyzer for Perimetry in Patients With Manifest and Suspect Glaucoma.比较 24-2 快速、快速和标准程序的瑞典交互式阈值算法的 Humphrey 视野分析仪在有明显和可疑青光眼的患者中的视野检查。
J Glaucoma. 2020 Nov;29(11):1070-1076. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001611.
9
Comparison of Elisar-Fast and Sita-Fast Strategies for Visual Field Assessment in Glaucoma.青光眼视野评估中Elisar-Fast与Sita-Fast策略的比较
J Glaucoma. 2025 Mar 1;34(3):198-204. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000002505. Epub 2024 Oct 2.
10
Vision-related Performance and Quality of Life of Patients With Rapid Glaucoma Progression.快速进展性青光眼患者的视力相关表现和生活质量。
J Glaucoma. 2019 Mar;28(3):216-222. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001179.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding Glaucoma: Why it Remains a Leading Cause of Blindness Worldwide.了解青光眼:为何它仍是全球失明的主要原因。
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2025 Jul;242(7):712-717. doi: 10.1055/a-2617-1575. Epub 2025 Jul 24.