Jemna Dănuț-Vasile, David Mihaela, Bonnal Liliane, Oros Cornel
Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iaşi, Bld. Carol I, no. 22, 700506, Iași, Romania.
Laboratoire d'économie de Poitiers (LéP), University of Poitiers, Building A1, 2 Jean Carbonnier Street, TSA 81100, Poitiers Cedex 9, 86073, France.
Health Econ Rev. 2024 Jul 31;14(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s13561-024-00535-1.
The European-wide statistics show that the use of flu vaccination remains low and the differences between countries are significant, as are those between different population groups within each country. Considerable research has focused on explaining vaccination uptake in relation to socio-economic and demographic characteristics, health promotion and health behavior factors. Nevertheless, few studies have aimed to analyze between-country differences in the use of flu vaccination for the EU population. To address this gap, this study examines the socio-economic inequalities in the use of influenza vaccination for the population aged 15 years and over in all 27 EU Member States and two other non-EU countries (Iceland and Norway).
Using data from the third wave of European Health Interview Survey (EHIS) 2019, we employed a multilevel logistic model with a random intercept for country, which allows controlling simultaneously the variations in individuals' characteristics and macro-contextual factors which could influence the use of flu vaccination. In addition, the analysis considers the population stratified into four age groups, namely adolescents, young adults, adults and elderly, to better capture heterogeneities in flu vaccination uptake.
The main findings confirm the existence of socio-economic inequalities between individuals in different age groups, but also of significant variation between European countries, particularly for older people, in the use of influenza vaccination. In this respect, income and education are strong proxy of socio-economic status associated with flu vaccination uptake. Moreover, these disparities within each population group are also explained by area of residence and occupational status. Particularly for the elderly, the differences between individuals in vaccine utilization are also explained by country-level factors, such as the type of healthcare system adopted in each country, public funding, personal health expenditure burden, or the availability of generalist practitioners.
Overall, our findings reveal that vaccination against seasonal influenza remains a critical public health intervention and bring attention to the relevance of conceiving and implementing context-specific strategies to ensure equitable access to vaccines for all EU citizens.
全欧洲的统计数据显示,流感疫苗接种率仍然很低,国家之间以及每个国家内不同人群之间的差异都很大。大量研究集中在解释与社会经济和人口特征、健康促进及健康行为因素相关的疫苗接种情况。然而,很少有研究旨在分析欧盟人群流感疫苗接种的国家间差异。为填补这一空白,本研究考察了欧盟27个成员国以及另外两个非欧盟国家(冰岛和挪威)15岁及以上人群流感疫苗接种方面的社会经济不平等情况。
利用2019年欧洲健康访谈调查(EHIS)第三轮的数据,我们采用了一个带有国家随机截距的多水平逻辑模型,该模型能够同时控制可能影响流感疫苗接种的个体特征和宏观背景因素的变化。此外,分析将人群分为四个年龄组,即青少年、年轻人、成年人和老年人,以更好地捕捉流感疫苗接种情况的异质性。
主要研究结果证实,不同年龄组个体之间存在社会经济不平等,而且欧洲国家之间在流感疫苗接种使用方面也存在显著差异,尤其是老年人。在这方面,收入和教育是与流感疫苗接种相关的社会经济地位的有力代表。此外,每个群体内部的这些差异也可由居住地区和职业状况来解释。特别是对于老年人,疫苗使用个体之间的差异也可由国家层面的因素来解释,比如每个国家采用的医疗保健系统类型、公共资金、个人医疗支出负担或全科医生的可及性。
总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,季节性流感疫苗接种仍然是一项关键的公共卫生干预措施,并提请注意制定和实施因地制宜的策略以确保所有欧盟公民公平获得疫苗的重要性。