• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于术前功能障碍评估成人颈椎畸形矫正术后的临床改善预期。

Expectations of clinical improvement following corrective surgery for adult cervical deformity based on functional disability at presentation.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Neurological Surgery, New York Spine Institute, NYU Langone Medical Center-Orthopaedic Hospital, 301 East 17th St, New York, NY, 10003, USA.

Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, VA, US.

出版信息

Spine Deform. 2024 Sep;12(5):1431-1439. doi: 10.1007/s43390-024-00896-x. Epub 2024 Jul 31.

DOI:10.1007/s43390-024-00896-x
PMID:39083198
Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess impact of baseline disability on HRQL outcomes.

METHODS

CD patients with baseline (BL) and 2 year (2Y) data included, and ranked into quartiles by baseline NDI, from lowest/best score (Q1) to highest/worst score (Q4). Means comparison tests analyzed differences between quartiles. ANCOVA and logistic regressions assessed differences in outcomes while accounting for covariates (BL deformity, comorbidities, HRQLs, surgical details and complications).

RESULTS

One hundred and sixteen patients met inclusion (Age:60.97 ± 10.45 years, BMI: 28.73 ± 7.59 kg/m, CCI: 0.94 ± 1.31). The cohort mean cSVA was 38.54 ± 19.43 mm and TS-CL: 37.34 ± 19.73. Mean BL NDI by quartile was: Q1: 25.04 ± 8.19, Q2: 41.61 ± 2.77, Q3: 53.31 ± 4.32, and Q4: 69.52 ± 8.35. Q2 demonstrated greatest improvement in NRS Neck at 2Y (-3.93), compared to Q3 (-1.61, p = .032) and Q4 (-1.41, p = .015). Q2 demonstrated greater improvement in NRS Back (-1.71), compared to Q4 (+ 0.84, p = .010). Q2 met MCID in NRS Neck at the highest rates (69.9%), especially compared to Q4 (30.3%), p = .039. Q2 had the greatest improvement in EQ-5D (+ 0.082), compared to Q1 (+ 0.073), Q3 (+ 0.022), and Q4 (+ 0.014), p = .034. Q2 also had the greatest mJOA improvement (+ 1.517), p = .042.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients in Q2, with mean BL NDI of 42, consistently demonstrated the greatest improvement in HRQLs whereas those in Q4, (NDI 70), saw the least. BL NDI between 39 and 44 may represent a disability "Sweet Spot," within which operative intervention maximizes patient-reported outcomes. Furthermore, delaying intervention until patients are severely disabled, beyond an NDI of 61, may limit the benefits of surgery.

摘要

目的

评估基线残疾对 HRQL 结局的影响。

方法

纳入基线(BL)和 2 年(2Y)数据的 CD 患者,并根据基线 NDI 将其分为四组,从最低/最佳分数(Q1)到最高/最差分数(Q4)。均值比较检验分析了四组之间的差异。协方差分析和逻辑回归评估了在考虑协变量(BL 畸形、合并症、HRQL、手术细节和并发症)的情况下结局的差异。

结果

116 名患者符合纳入标准(年龄:60.97±10.45 岁,BMI:28.73±7.59kg/m,CCI:0.94±1.31)。该队列的平均 cSVA 为 38.54±19.43mm,TS-CL 为 37.34±19.73。按四分位数的 BL NDI 平均值为:Q1:25.04±8.19,Q2:41.61±2.77,Q3:53.31±4.32,Q4:69.52±8.35。与 Q3(-1.61,p=0.032)和 Q4(-1.41,p=0.015)相比,Q2 在 2Y 时在 NRS 颈部方面表现出最大的改善(-3.93)。与 Q4(+0.84,p=0.010)相比,Q2 在 NRS 背部方面表现出更大的改善(-1.71)。Q2 在 NRS 颈部方面达到 MCID 的比例最高(69.9%),尤其是与 Q4(30.3%)相比,p=0.039。与 Q1(+0.073)、Q3(+0.022)和 Q4(+0.014)相比,Q2 在 EQ-5D 方面表现出最大的改善(+0.082),p=0.034。与 Q1(+0.073)、Q3(+0.022)和 Q4(+0.014)相比,Q2 在 mJOA 方面也表现出最大的改善(+1.517),p=0.042。

结论

BL NDI 均值为 42 的 Q2 患者的 HRQL 改善最大,而 NDI 为 70 的 Q4 患者的改善最小。BL NDI 在 39 和 44 之间可能代表残疾的“甜蜜点”,在此范围内手术干预可最大限度地提高患者报告的结果。此外,BL NDI 超过 61 时,延迟干预直到患者出现严重残疾,可能会限制手术的益处。

相似文献

1
Expectations of clinical improvement following corrective surgery for adult cervical deformity based on functional disability at presentation.基于术前功能障碍评估成人颈椎畸形矫正术后的临床改善预期。
Spine Deform. 2024 Sep;12(5):1431-1439. doi: 10.1007/s43390-024-00896-x. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
2
Despite worse baseline status depressed patients achieved outcomes similar to those in nondepressed patients after surgery for cervical deformity.尽管抑郁患者的基线状况较差,但他们在接受颈椎畸形手术后的结果与非抑郁患者相似。
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Dec;43(6):E10. doi: 10.3171/2017.8.FOCUS17486.
3
Evaluating cervical deformity corrective surgery outcomes at 1-year using current patient-derived and functional measures: are they adequate?使用当前患者来源的和功能测量方法评估颈椎畸形矫正手术1年时的疗效:这些方法是否足够?
J Spine Surg. 2018 Jun;4(2):295-303. doi: 10.21037/jss.2018.05.29.
4
Predictors of Superior Recovery Kinetics in Adult Cervical Deformity Correction: An Analysis Using a Novel Area Under the Curve Methodology.成人颈椎畸形矫正中恢复动力学的优势预测因素:一种使用新的曲线下面积分析方法。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2021 May 1;46(9):559-566. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003971.
5
What are the major drivers of outcomes in cervical deformity surgery?颈椎畸形手术结果的主要驱动因素有哪些?
J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2021 Oct-Dec;12(4):401-405. doi: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_106_21. Epub 2021 Dec 11.
6
Predicting the combined occurrence of poor clinical and radiographic outcomes following cervical deformity corrective surgery.预测颈椎畸形矫正手术后临床和影像学结果不良的联合发生。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2019 Nov 1;32(2):182-190. doi: 10.3171/2019.7.SPINE18651. Print 2020 Feb 1.
7
Can Baseline Disability Predict Outcomes in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery?基线残疾程度能否预测成人脊柱畸形手术的结果?
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2024 Mar 15;49(6):398-404. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004804. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
8
Improvement in some Ames-ISSG cervical deformity classification modifier grades may correlate with clinical improvement.改良的 Ames-ISSG 颈椎畸形分类修正等级可能与临床改善相关。
J Clin Neurosci. 2021 Jul;89:297-304. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2021.05.007. Epub 2021 May 21.
9
Accurately measuring the quality and effectiveness of cervical spine surgery in registry efforts: determining the most valid and responsive instruments.在登记工作中准确衡量颈椎手术的质量和效果:确定最有效且灵敏的指标。
Spine J. 2015 Jun 1;15(6):1203-9. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.07.444. Epub 2013 Sep 26.
10
Surgical costs in adult cervical Deformity: Do higher cost surgeries lead to better Outcomes?成人颈椎畸形的手术费用:费用更高的手术是否会带来更好的结果?
J Clin Neurosci. 2023 Jul;113:126-129. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2023.04.020. Epub 2023 May 31.

本文引用的文献

1
The discrepancy between preoperative cervical sagittal vertical axis and T1 slope predisposes inferior clinical outcomes in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy after cervical laminoplasty.术前颈椎矢状垂直轴与T1斜率之间的差异易导致颈椎病性脊髓病患者颈椎椎板成形术后临床疗效较差。
Front Surg. 2022 Aug 26;9:1003757. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1003757. eCollection 2022.
2
Surgical Strategy for the Management of Cervical Deformity Is Based on Type of Cervical Deformity.颈椎畸形的手术治疗策略基于颈椎畸形的类型。
J Clin Med. 2021 Oct 21;10(21):4826. doi: 10.3390/jcm10214826.
3
Cervical Deformity: Evaluation, Classification, and Surgical Planning.
颈椎畸形:评估、分类及手术规划
Neurospine. 2020 Dec;17(4):833-842. doi: 10.14245/ns.2040524.262. Epub 2020 Dec 31.
4
Patient Selection in Cervical Disc Arthroplasty.颈椎间盘置换术的患者选择
Int J Spine Surg. 2020 Aug;14(s2):S29-S35. doi: 10.14444/7088.
5
The relationship between preoperative cervical sagittal balance and clinical outcome of laminoplasty treated cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament patients.术前颈椎矢状平衡与后路颈椎后纵韧带骨化症患者接受椎板成形术治疗的临床疗效的关系。
Spine J. 2020 Sep;20(9):1422-1429. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.05.542. Epub 2020 May 28.
6
Outcomes and value in elective cervical spine surgery: an introductory and practical narrative review.选择性颈椎手术的结果与价值:一篇介绍性与实用性的叙述性综述
J Spine Surg. 2020 Mar;6(1):89-105. doi: 10.21037/jss.2020.01.11.
7
Cervical Spine Deformity Correction Techniques.颈椎畸形矫正技术
Neurospine. 2019 Sep;16(3):470-482. doi: 10.14245/ns.1938288.144. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
8
The prevalence of complications associated with lumbar and thoracic spinal deformity surgery in the elderly population: a meta-analysis.老年人群腰椎和胸椎脊柱畸形手术相关并发症的患病率:一项荟萃分析。
J Spine Surg. 2019 Jun;5(2):223-235. doi: 10.21037/jss.2019.03.06.
9
Cost-utility analysis of cervical deformity surgeries using 1-year outcome.颈椎畸形手术的成本-效用分析:基于 1 年的结果。
Spine J. 2018 Sep;18(9):1552-1557. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.01.016. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
10
Outcomes of Operative Treatment for Adult Cervical Deformity: A Prospective Multicenter Assessment With 1-Year Follow-up.成人颈椎畸形手术治疗的结果:前瞻性多中心评估及 1 年随访。
Neurosurgery. 2018 Nov 1;83(5):1031-1039. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyx574.