Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Institute for Clinical and Translational Research and School of Nursing, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
J Palliat Med. 2024 Aug;27(8):993-1000. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2023.0555. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
Older adults with serious illness near the end-of-life often receive invasive treatments. We developed a conceptual model called clinical momentum that describes system-level forces producing a trajectory of care that is difficult to modify and contributes to overtreatment. We sought to evaluate the empirical fit of our model by examining an event with clear guidelines against intervention: permanent feeding tube placement in patients with advanced dementia. We screened three hospitals and identified patients 65 years and older with advanced dementia who received a permanent feeding tube. We interviewed 34 family members and clinicians. We coded transcripts and characterized factors that arose during the course of care and their relationships to feeding tube placement. We used abductive analysis to compare the data with theory and identify areas of discordance and alignment. We found that the course of care started with a temporary tube to correct an acute problem. As problems were identified, multiple clinicians were consulted to address a specific problem without collective discussion of the patient's health trajectory. Eventually, clinicians had to address the temporary tube, which was framed to families as a decision to place a permanent feeding tube or withdraw treatment. Elements of the model-including recognition-primed decision-making, "fix-it," and sunk costs-contributed to placement of a feeding tube, which set in motion a path toward intervention long before a goals-of-care conversation occurs. Clinical momentum expands our understanding of overtreatment at the end-of-life and may reveal opportunities to reduce other nonbeneficial interventions.
生命末期重病的老年人经常接受侵入性治疗。我们开发了一个称为临床动力的概念模型,描述了产生难以改变的护理轨迹的系统级力量,并导致过度治疗。我们试图通过检查一个有明确干预指南的事件来评估我们模型的实证拟合,该事件是对患有晚期痴呆症的患者进行永久性喂养管放置。我们筛选了三所医院,确定了接受永久性喂养管的 65 岁及以上的晚期痴呆症患者。我们采访了 34 名家属和临床医生。我们对记录进行了编码,并描述了在护理过程中出现的因素及其与喂养管放置的关系。我们使用溯因分析将数据与理论进行比较,以确定不一致和一致的领域。我们发现,护理过程从纠正急性问题的临时管开始。随着问题的出现,多位临床医生被咨询以解决特定问题,而没有对患者的健康轨迹进行集体讨论。最终,临床医生不得不处理临时管,这对家属来说是决定放置永久性喂养管或停止治疗。模型的要素,包括启发式决策、“修复”和沉没成本,促成了喂养管的放置,这在进行治疗目标的对话之前很久就为干预铺平了道路。临床动力扩展了我们对生命末期过度治疗的理解,可能揭示了减少其他非有益干预的机会。