• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无夹单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术应用 LigaSure 的安全性和可行性评估:一项前瞻性临床研究。

Evaluation of Safety and Feasibility of Using LigaSure During Clipless Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Prospective Clinical Study.

机构信息

General Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.

General Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Horus University-Egypt, New Damietta, Egypt.

出版信息

J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2024 Nov;34(11):1000-1006. doi: 10.1089/lap.2024.0157. Epub 2024 Jul 31.

DOI:10.1089/lap.2024.0157
PMID:39083433
Abstract

Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) is a minimally invasive procedure designed to minimize the number and size of the incisions needed for cholecystectomy. Titanium clips are traditionally used to close the cystic duct and artery. Although it is considered safe, dislodgement can result in bleeding and biliary leakage. Using LigaSure for duct sealing is still controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of using LigaSure to close the cystic duct during SILC. A prospective study over two years was conducted at the General Surgery Department, Mansoura University Hospital, on 102 patients, 51 in each group. They underwent SILC using LigaSure (Group 1) or titanium clips (Group 2) to control the cystic duct and artery. The data analyzed included demographic data, operative time, intra- and postoperative complications, postoperative pain, and hospital stay. The operative time was significantly shorter in LigaSure group (68.5 ± 9.8 versus 72.9 ± 10.6 minutes in the clips group, .03). There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding postoperative bile leak or bleeding. However, two cases in Group 1 and four cases in Group 2 were converted to multiple port laparoscopic cholecystectomy; this was statistically nonsignificant. Postoperative pain and hospital stay showed no significant difference between the two groups. Two patients in each group developed port-site incisional hernia. Clipless SILC using LigaSure is a feasible and safe procedure with acceptable morbidity with shorter operative time than SILC using clips. Nevertheless, the risk of port-site incisional hernia should be explained to the patients.

摘要

单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术(SILC)是一种微创技术,旨在减少胆囊切除术所需的切口数量和大小。传统上使用钛夹来关闭胆囊管和动脉。虽然被认为是安全的,但夹闭可能会导致出血和胆漏。使用 LigaSure 进行胆管密封仍然存在争议。本研究旨在评估在 SILC 中使用 LigaSure 关闭胆囊管的安全性和可行性。

在曼苏拉大学医院普外科进行了为期两年的前瞻性研究,共纳入 102 例患者,每组 51 例。他们接受 SILC 手术,使用 LigaSure(第 1 组)或钛夹(第 2 组)控制胆囊管和动脉。分析的数据包括人口统计学数据、手术时间、围手术期并发症、术后疼痛和住院时间。LigaSure 组的手术时间明显更短(68.5±9.8 分钟比夹闭组 72.9±10.6 分钟,P=0.03)。两组在术后胆漏或出血方面无显著差异。然而,第 1 组有 2 例和第 2 组有 4 例患者转为多孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术,差异无统计学意义。两组术后疼痛和住院时间无显著差异。两组各有 2 例患者发生切口疝。

无夹闭 SILC 使用 LigaSure 是一种可行且安全的手术方法,其发病率可接受,且手术时间短于使用夹闭的 SILC。然而,应向患者解释发生切口疝的风险。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Safety and Feasibility of Using LigaSure During Clipless Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Prospective Clinical Study.无夹单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术应用 LigaSure 的安全性和可行性评估:一项前瞻性临床研究。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2024 Nov;34(11):1000-1006. doi: 10.1089/lap.2024.0157. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
2
Long-term incisional hernia rate after single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is significantly higher than that after standard three-port laparoscopy: a cohort study.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的长期切口疝发生率明显高于标准三孔腹腔镜:一项队列研究。
Hernia. 2019 Dec;23(6):1205-1213. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-01969-x. Epub 2019 May 9.
3
Intermediate results of a prospective randomized controlled trial of traditional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy.前瞻性随机对照试验的中期结果:传统四孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术与单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较。
Surg Endosc. 2012 May;26(5):1296-303. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-2028-z. Epub 2011 Nov 15.
4
Comparison study of clinical outcomes between single-site robotic cholecystectomy and single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy.单部位机器人胆囊切除术与单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术临床疗效的对比研究。
Asian J Surg. 2017 Nov;40(6):424-428. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2016.03.005. Epub 2016 May 14.
5
Transvaginal cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective cohort study.经阴道胆囊切除术与单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术与四孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的前瞻性队列研究。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Oct;26(10):2823-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2253-0. Epub 2012 May 2.
6
Single incision cholecystectomy using a clipless technique with LigaSure in a resource limited environment: The Bahamas experience.在资源有限环境下使用LigaSure无夹技术进行单切口胆囊切除术:巴哈马的经验。
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2015;11:104-109. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2015.04.034. Epub 2015 May 1.
7
Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy with routine intraoperative cholangiography and common bile duct exploration via the umbilical port.经脐部单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术联合术中常规胆道造影及胆总管探查术。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Apr;26(4):1122-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-2009-2. Epub 2011 Dec 15.
8
Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: does it work? A systematic review.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术:可行吗?一项系统评价。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Oct;30(10):4389-99. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4757-5. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
9
Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with improved cosmesis scoring at the cost of significantly higher hernia rates: 1-year results of a prospective randomized, multicenter, single-blinded trial of traditional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术在美容评分方面具有优势,但疝的发生率显著升高:传统多孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术与单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术前瞻性随机、多中心、单盲临床试验的 1 年结果。
J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Jun;216(6):1037-47; discussion 1047-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.02.024. Epub 2013 Apr 23.
10
Safety and feasibility of needlescopic grasper-assisted single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with acute cholecystitis: comparison with three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.针状内镜抓钳辅助单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎患者的安全性和可行性:与三孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2014 Aug;24(8):523-7. doi: 10.1089/lap.2013.0552. Epub 2014 May 12.