• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

亚洲裔美国人和夏威夷原住民-太平洋岛民(AAPI)中诊断为结肠癌的患者行择期结肠切除术的腹腔镜与机器人技术的手术结果和利用比较。

Surgical Outcomes and Utilization of Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Techniques for Elective Colectomy in Asian American and Native Hawaiian-Pacific Islanders (AAPI) Diagnosed With Colon Cancer.

机构信息

VA Connecticut Healthcare System, US Department of Veterans Affairs, West Haven, Connecticut; Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.

VA Connecticut Healthcare System, US Department of Veterans Affairs, West Haven, Connecticut; Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; National Clinical Scholars Program, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; Department of Surgery, Maine Medical Center, Portland, Maine.

出版信息

J Surg Res. 2024 Oct;302:40-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.07.007. Epub 2024 Jul 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2024.07.007
PMID:39083904
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Asian American and Native Hawaiian-Pacific Islanders (AAPI) are the fastest growing racial-ethnic group, with 18.9 million people in 2019, and is predicted to rise to 46 million by 2060. Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the most common cancer in AAPI men and the third most common in women. Treatment techniques like laparoscopic colectomy (LC) emerged as the standard of care for CRC resections; however, new robotic technologies can be advantageous. Few studies have compared clinical outcomes across minimally invasive approaches for AAPI patients with CRC. This study compares utilization and clinical outcomes of LC versus robotic colectomies (RCs) in AAPI patients.

METHODS

We queried the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database for elective RC and LC in AAPI patients from 2012 to 2020. Outcomes included unplanned conversion to open, operative time, complications, 30-d mortality, and length of stay. Multivariable logistic regression analyses assessed the association between outcomes and the operative approach.

RESULTS

Between 2012 and 2020, 83,841 patients underwent elective LC or RC. Four thousand six hundred fifty-eight AAPI patients underwent 3817 (82%) LCs and 841 (18%) RCs. In 2012, all procedures were performed laparoscopically; by 2020, 27% were robotic. Mean operative time was shorter in LC (192 versus 249 min, P < 0.001). On multivariable logistic regression, there was no difference in infection (odds ratio [OR] 0.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59-1.12), anastomotic leak (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.59-1.61), or death (OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.31-2.61). Length of stay was shorter for RC (-0.44 d, 95% CI -0.71 to -0.18 d).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, AAPI postoperative outcomes are similar between LC and RC. Future studies that evaluate costs and resource utilization can assist hospitals in determining whether implementing robotic-assisted technologies in their hospitals and communities will be appropriate.

摘要

简介

亚裔美国人和夏威夷原住民-太平洋岛民(AAPI)是增长最快的种族群体,2019 年有 1890 万人,预计到 2060 年将增长到 4600 万。结直肠癌(CRC)是 AAPI 男性中最常见的癌症,也是女性中第三常见的癌症。腹腔镜结肠切除术(LC)等治疗技术已成为 CRC 切除的标准治疗方法;然而,新的机器人技术可能具有优势。很少有研究比较过 AAPI 结直肠癌患者接受微创方法治疗的临床结果。本研究比较了 AAPI 患者中 LC 与机器人结肠切除术(RC)的应用和临床结果。

方法

我们从 2012 年至 2020 年,在美国外科医师学会国家手术质量改进计划数据库中查询了 AAPI 患者的择期 RC 和 LC。结果包括计划外转为开放、手术时间、并发症、30 天死亡率和住院时间。多变量逻辑回归分析评估了结局与手术方式之间的关联。

结果

2012 年至 2020 年间,83841 例患者接受了 LC 或 RC 治疗。4658 例 AAPI 患者接受了 3817 例(82%)LC 和 841 例(18%)RC。2012 年所有手术均为腹腔镜手术,到 2020 年,27%为机器人手术。LC 的平均手术时间更短(192 分钟与 249 分钟,P<0.001)。多变量逻辑回归分析显示,感染(比值比[OR]0.8,95%置信区间[CI]0.59-1.12)、吻合口漏(OR 0.97,95%CI 0.59-1.61)或死亡(OR 0.9,95%CI 0.31-2.61)无差异。RC 的住院时间更短(-0.44 天,95%CI-0.71 至-0.18 天)。

结论

总体而言,LC 和 RC 之间 AAPI 的术后结果相似。未来评估成本和资源利用的研究可以帮助医院确定在其医院和社区中实施机器人辅助技术是否合适。

相似文献

1
Surgical Outcomes and Utilization of Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Techniques for Elective Colectomy in Asian American and Native Hawaiian-Pacific Islanders (AAPI) Diagnosed With Colon Cancer.亚洲裔美国人和夏威夷原住民-太平洋岛民(AAPI)中诊断为结肠癌的患者行择期结肠切除术的腹腔镜与机器人技术的手术结果和利用比较。
J Surg Res. 2024 Oct;302:40-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.07.007. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
2
Clinical outcomes of elective robotic vs laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer utilizing a large national database.利用大型国家数据库评估择期机器人与腹腔镜结肠癌手术的临床结局。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Sep;37(9):7199-7205. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10215-6. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
3
The robotic approach significantly reduces length of stay after colectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis.机器人手术方法显著缩短了结肠切除术后的住院时间:一项倾向评分匹配分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017 Oct;32(10):1415-1421. doi: 10.1007/s00384-017-2845-1. Epub 2017 Jul 7.
4
Laparoscopic versus robotic colectomy: a national surgical quality improvement project analysis.腹腔镜与机器人辅助结肠切除术:一项国家外科质量改进项目分析。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jun;31(6):2387-2396. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5239-5. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
5
Robotic versus standard laparoscopic elective colectomy: where are the benefits?机器人辅助与标准腹腔镜选择性结肠切除术:优势何在?
J Surg Res. 2018 Apr;224:72-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.11.059. Epub 2017 Dec 22.
6
Surgical and medical outcomes in robotic compared to laparoscopic colectomy global prospective cohort from the American college of surgeons national surgical quality improvement program.美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划全球前瞻性队列研究机器人与腹腔镜结肠切除术的手术和医疗效果比较。
Surg Endosc. 2024 May;38(5):2571-2576. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10717-x. Epub 2024 Mar 18.
7
Frailer Patients Undergoing Robotic Colectomies for Colon Cancer Experience Increased Complication Rates Compared With Open or Laparoscopic Approaches.对于接受机器人结肠癌切除术的体弱患者而言,其并发症发生率较开放性或腹腔镜手术更高。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2020 May;63(5):588-597. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001598.
8
Comparison of 30-Day Postoperative Outcomes after Laparoscopic vs Robotic Colectomy.腹腔镜与机器人辅助结肠切除术后30天的手术结果比较。
J Am Coll Surg. 2016 Aug;223(2):369-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.03.041. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
9
Open Colectomies of Shorter Operative Time Do Not Result in Improved Outcomes Compared With Prolonged Laparoscopic Operations.与延长的腹腔镜手术相比,手术时间较短的开放性结肠切除术并不会带来更好的治疗效果。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2017 Oct;27(5):361-365. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000443.
10
Racial disparities in complications following elective colon cancer resection: Impact of laparoscopic versus robotic approaches.择期结肠癌切除术后并发症的种族差异:腹腔镜与机器人手术方式的影响。
Am J Surg. 2024 Jan;227:85-89. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.09.038. Epub 2023 Sep 28.