Suppr超能文献

来自创伤手术中伤口愈合(WHIST)试验的下肢严重骨折患者的 5 年结果。

Five-year outcomes for patients sustaining severe fractures of the lower limb from the Wound Healing in Surgery for Trauma (WHIST) trial.

机构信息

Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Science (NDORMS), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Liverpool Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

出版信息

Bone Joint J. 2024 Aug 1;106-B(8):858-864. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.106B8.BJJ-2024-0169.R1.

Abstract

AIMS

The aims of this study were to report the outcomes of patients with a complex fracture of the lower limb in the five years after they took part in the Wound Healing in Surgery for Trauma (WHIST) trial.

METHODS

The WHIST trial compared negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) dressings with standard dressings applied at the end of the first operation for patients undergoing internal fixation of a complex fracture of the lower limb. Complex fractures included periarticular fractures and open fractures when the wound could be closed primarily at the end of the first debridement. A total of 1,548 patients aged ≥ 16 years completed the initial follow-up, six months after injury. In this study we report the pre-planned analysis of outcome data up to five years. Patients reported their Disability Rating Index (DRI) (0 to 100, in which 100 = total disability), and health-related quality of life, chronic pain scores and neuropathic pain scores annually, using a self-reported questionnaire. Complications, including further surgery related to the fracture, were also recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 1,015 of the original patients (66%) provided at least one set of outcome data during the five years of follow-up. There was no evidence of a difference in patient-reported disability between the two groups at five years (NPWT group mean DRI 30.0 (SD 26.5), standard dressing group mean DRI 31.5 (SD 28.8), adjusted difference -0.86 (95% CI -4.14 to 2.40; p = 0.609). There was also no evidence of a difference in the complication rates at this time.

CONCLUSION

We found no evidence of a difference in disability ratings between NPWT compared with standard wound dressings in the five years following the surgical treatment of a complex fracture of the lower limb. Patients in both groups reported high levels of persistent disability and reduced quality of life, with little evidence of improvement during this time.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在报告参加创伤外科伤口愈合(WHIST)试验的患者在接受下肢复杂骨折治疗后五年的结局。

方法

WHIST 试验比较了负压伤口治疗(NPWT)敷料与标准敷料在下肢复杂骨折内固定术后首次手术结束时的应用效果。复杂骨折包括关节周围骨折和初次清创时可一期闭合的开放性骨折。共有 1548 名年龄≥16 岁的患者完成了最初的 6 个月的随访。在本研究中,我们报告了预先计划的至 5 年的结局数据分析。患者使用自我报告问卷每年报告残疾评定指数(DRI)(0-100,其中 100=完全残疾)和健康相关生活质量、慢性疼痛评分和神经病理性疼痛评分。还记录了并发症,包括与骨折相关的进一步手术。

结果

在 5 年的随访中,最初的 1015 名患者中有(66%)至少提供了一组结局数据。5 年时,两组患者报告的残疾情况无差异(NPWT 组 DRI 平均值 30.0(SD 26.5),标准敷料组 DRI 平均值 31.5(SD 28.8),调整后的差异-0.86(95%CI-4.14 至 2.40;p=0.609)。此时并发症发生率也无差异。

结论

我们发现,在下肢复杂骨折手术后的 5 年中,与标准伤口敷料相比,NPWT 并没有改善残疾评分。两组患者都报告了持续性残疾和生活质量下降,且在此期间几乎没有改善的证据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验