Murphy Myles, Merrick Nicole, Cowen Gill, Sutton Vanessa, Allen Garth, Hart Nicolas H, Mosler Andrea B
Nutrition and Health Innovation Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia
School of Health Sciences, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, WA, Australia.
Inj Prev. 2025 Jan 23;31(1):9-17. doi: 10.1136/ip-2023-045150.
There are inconsistent reports of factors relating to injury, illness and tactical performance in law enforcement recruits. Our objectives were to: (1) report physical and psychological risk factors and protective factors for injury and illness and (2) report physical and psychological risk factors and protective factors for tactical performance success.
Systematic epidemiological review.
Searches of six databases were conducted on 13 December 2022. We included cohorts that assessed physical and psychological factors for injury, illness and tactical performance success. Study quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Quality Assessment Checklist for Prevalence Studies and certainty assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation.
30 studies were included, and quality assessment was performed. Very low certainty of evidence exists for physical variables related to injury risk, and we found no studies that investigated psychological variables as a risk factor for injury. Low-certainty evidence found older age, poorer performance with push-up reps to failure, poorer arm ergometer revolutions, poorer beep test, poorer 75-yard pursuit and the 1.5 miles run tests to be associated with reduced tactical performance. Very low certainty of evidence exists that the psychological variables of intelligence and anger are associated with tactical performance.
We identified a lack of high-level evidence for factors associated with injury, illness and performance. Interventions based on this research will be suboptimal. We suggest context-specific factors related to injury, illness and performance in law enforcement populations are used to inform current practice while further, high-quality research into risk factors is performed.
CRD42022381973.
关于执法新兵受伤、患病及战术表现相关因素的报道并不一致。我们的目标是:(1)报告受伤和患病的身体及心理风险因素与保护因素;(2)报告战术表现成功的身体及心理风险因素与保护因素。
系统的流行病学综述。
于2022年12月13日对六个数据库进行了检索。我们纳入了评估受伤、患病及战术表现成功的身体和心理因素的队列研究。使用乔安娜·布里格斯研究所患病率研究质量评估清单评估研究质量,并使用推荐分级评估、制定和评价方法评估证据的确定性。
纳入了30项研究并进行了质量评估。与受伤风险相关的身体变量的证据确定性极低,且我们未发现有研究将心理变量作为受伤的风险因素进行调查。低确定性证据表明,年龄较大、俯卧撑重复次数至力竭时表现较差、手臂测力计转数较低、哔哔声测试成绩较差、75码追逐测试成绩较差以及1.5英里跑步测试成绩较差与战术表现下降有关。关于智力和愤怒的心理变量与战术表现相关的证据确定性极低。
我们发现缺乏与受伤、患病及表现相关因素的高级别证据。基于此研究的干预措施将并非最优。我们建议利用与执法人群中受伤、患病及表现相关的特定背景因素为当前实践提供信息,同时对风险因素进行进一步的高质量研究。
PROSPERO注册号:CRD42022381973。