• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

风湿病学的新疗法。

Newer Therapies in Rheumatology.

机构信息

Division of Rheumatology, University of Washington, 1959 Pacific Street, Box 356428, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.

Division of Rheumatology, University of Washington, 1959 Pacific Street, Box 356428, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.

出版信息

Med Clin North Am. 2024 Sep;108(5):829-842. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2024.02.004. Epub 2024 Apr 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.mcna.2024.02.004
PMID:39084836
Abstract

Seven of the 11 newer medications recently or soon to be approved to treat rheumatologic diseases discussed in this article are biologic agents and reflect the current ability of science to target specific components of the immune system. The other agents are molecules that are directed against specific immune pathway targets as well. All have shown superiority to placebo and in some cases have been compared to currently accepted therapies. Safety issues are generally centered around infections due to the immune-interrupting nature of these therapies.

摘要

本文讨论了最近或即将获得批准用于治疗风湿性疾病的 11 种新药中的 7 种是生物制剂,这反映了科学靶向免疫系统特定成分的当前能力。其他药物也是针对特定免疫途径靶点的分子。所有这些药物都显示出优于安慰剂的效果,在某些情况下还与目前可接受的治疗方法进行了比较。安全性问题通常集中在由于这些治疗方法具有免疫抑制性质而导致的感染上。

相似文献

1
Newer Therapies in Rheumatology.风湿病学的新疗法。
Med Clin North Am. 2024 Sep;108(5):829-842. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2024.02.004. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
2
Immunotherapies in rheumatologic disorders.风湿性疾病的免疫治疗。
Med Clin North Am. 2012 May;96(3):475-96, ix-x. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2012.04.003. Epub 2012 May 1.
3
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of abatacept, adalimumab, etanercept and tocilizumab for treating juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a systematic review and economic evaluation.阿巴西普、阿达木单抗、依那西普和托珠单抗治疗幼年特发性关节炎的临床有效性和成本效益:一项系统评价和经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Apr;20(34):1-222. doi: 10.3310/hta20340.
4
Special Article: 2018 American College of Rheumatology/National Psoriasis Foundation Guideline for the Treatment of Psoriatic Arthritis.特稿:2018 年美国风湿病学会/国家银屑病基金会银屑病关节炎治疗指南。
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019 Jan;71(1):5-32. doi: 10.1002/art.40726. Epub 2018 Nov 30.
5
Comparative Risk of Hospitalized Infection Associated With Biologic Agents in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Enrolled in Medicare.医疗保险中类风湿关节炎患者使用生物制剂与住院感染相关的比较风险。
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016 Jan;68(1):56-66. doi: 10.1002/art.39399.
6
Biologics or tofacitinib for rheumatoid arthritis in incomplete responders to methotrexate or other traditional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.生物制剂或托法替布用于对甲氨蝶呤或其他传统改善病情抗风湿药物反应不完全的类风湿关节炎患者:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 13;2016(5):CD012183. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012183.
7
Cost of biologics per treated patient across immune-mediated inflammatory disease indications in a pharmacy benefit management setting: a retrospective cohort study.药房效益管理环境下免疫介导炎症性疾病适应症中每位接受治疗患者的生物制剂成本:一项回顾性队列研究。
Clin Ther. 2014 Aug 1;36(8):1231-41, 1241.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.06.014. Epub 2014 Jul 23.
8
Comparative effectiveness of first-line tumour necrosis factor inhibitor versus non-tumour necrosis factor inhibitor biologics and targeted synthetic agents in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from a large US registry study.比较类风湿关节炎患者一线肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂与非肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂生物制剂和靶向合成药物的疗效:来自一项大型美国注册研究的结果。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2021 Jan;80(1):96-102. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217209. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
9
Biologics for rheumatoid arthritis: an overview of Cochrane reviews.类风湿关节炎的生物制剂:Cochrane系统评价概述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Oct 7;2009(4):CD007848. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007848.pub2.
10
Evolving Landscape of Biologic Therapy for Pediatric Psoriasis.生物治疗儿科银屑病的不断发展的格局。
Dermatol Clin. 2024 Jul;42(3):377-386. doi: 10.1016/j.det.2024.02.003. Epub 2024 Mar 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Trends and collaborations in discoid lupus erythematosus research: a bibliometric analysis from 2010 to 2024.盘状红斑狼疮研究的趋势与合作:2010年至2024年的文献计量分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jun 20;12:1556976. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1556976. eCollection 2025.