Luan T, Xie X H, Lin X Q, Deng H Y, Li Y J, Sun J L, Yang G, Zhang Y H, Wang S Y, Wang C C, Zhong N S, Zhou C Z
Department of Oncology Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou 510120, China.
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Kunming University of Science and Technology Affiliated Hospital, Yunnan First People's Hospital, Kunming 650000, China.
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2024 Aug 6;104(30):2797-2804. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20240528-01209.
To discuss the efficacy and safety of the dual immunotherapy of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who are double negative for driver gene and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. We conducted a retrospective collection of clinical data for 61 patients with advanced NSCLC who were negative for both driver genes and PD-L1 and received dual immunotherapy with nivolumab plus ipilimumab at the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University from January 2019 to June 2023. Based on treatment conditions, patients were divided into first-line and non-first-line dual immunotherapy groups. Patients were followed up monthly, with the follow-up period ending on October 1, 2023. The efficacy was evaluated using Solid Tumor Response Evaluation Criteria, and adverse reactions were assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events developed by the National Cancer Institute in the United States. Survival curves were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the log-rank test was used to compare the differences in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between first-line and non-first-line dual immunotherapy patients. The influence factors of PFS were analyzed using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model. Among the 61 NSCLC patients, 49 were male (80.3%), with an age range of 23-88 years [(65.3±7.4) years]. There were 14 cases (23.0%) classified as stage ⅢC and 47 cases (77.0%) classified as stage Ⅳ according to TNM staging. Forty cases (65.6%) received non-first-line treatment. The objective response rate (ORR) was 24.6% (15/61), and the disease control rate (DCR) was 52.5% (32/61). All 61 patients were followed up, with a median follow-up time of 17.8 months. The median PFS was 6.0 months (95%: 5.5-6.4 months), and the median OS was 17.0 months (95%: 14.8-19.2 months). For patients receiving first-line dual immunotherapy, the median PFS was longer than for those receiving non-first-line dual immunotherapy [7.0 months (95%: 6.0-7.9 months) vs 4.0 months (95%: 3.3-4.6 months), <0.001]; similarly, the median OS for patients receiving first-line dual immunotherapy was longer than for those receiving non-first-line dual immunotherapy [19.0 months (95%: 18.1-19.9 months) vs 13.0 months (95%: 10.8-15.1 months), <0.001]. Multivariate Cox risk regression model analysis showed that distant tumor metastasis (=1.414, 95%: 1.253-1.725), non-first-line dual immunotherapy (=1.412, 95%: 1.184-1.652), and tumor mutation burden<10 mut/Mb (=1.328, 95%: 1.151-1.546) were risk factors for PFS, while non-squamous carcinoma (=0.917, 95% 0.823-0.984) was a protective factor for PFS. Immune-related adverse reactions occurred in 41 cases (67.2%), including 21 cases (32.8%) of grade 3-4 adverse reactions. Eight cases (13.1%) discontinued treatment, and there were no deaths. Dual immunotherapy with nivolumab plus ipilimumab can be a treatment option for driver gene and PD-L1 double-negative advanced NSCLC. Distant tumor metastasis, non-first-line dual immunotherapy, and tumor mutation burden<10 mut/Mb are risk factors affecting patients' PFS, while non-squamous cell carcinoma is a protective factor affecting patients' PFS.
探讨纳武利尤单抗联合伊匹木单抗双免疫疗法治疗驱动基因及程序性死亡配体1(PD-L1)表达均为阴性的晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的疗效及安全性。我们回顾性收集了2019年1月至2023年6月在广州医科大学附属第一医院接受纳武利尤单抗联合伊匹木单抗双免疫疗法治疗的61例驱动基因及PD-L1均为阴性的晚期NSCLC患者的临床资料。根据治疗情况,将患者分为一线双免疫治疗组和非一线双免疫治疗组。每月对患者进行随访,随访期至2023年10月1日结束。采用实体瘤疗效评价标准评估疗效,根据美国国立癌症研究所制定的《不良事件通用术语标准》评估不良反应。采用Kaplan-Meier法绘制生存曲线,采用对数秩检验比较一线和非一线双免疫治疗患者的无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)差异。采用多因素Cox比例风险回归模型分析PFS的影响因素。61例NSCLC患者中,男性49例(80.3%),年龄范围为23-88岁[(65.3±7.4)岁]。根据TNM分期,ⅢC期14例(23.0%),Ⅳ期47例(77.0%)。40例(65.6%)接受非一线治疗。客观缓解率(ORR)为24.6%(15/61),疾病控制率(DCR)为52.5%(32/61)。61例患者均获随访,中位随访时间为17.8个月。中位PFS为6.0个月(95%:5.5-6.4个月),中位OS为17.0个月(95%:14.8-19.2个月)。接受一线双免疫治疗的患者中位PFS长于接受非一线双免疫治疗的患者[7.0个月(95%:6.0-7.9个月) vs 4.0个月(95%:3.3-4.6个月),<0.001];同样,接受一线双免疫治疗的患者中位OS长于接受非一线双免疫治疗的患者[19.0个月(95%:18.1-19.9个月) vs 13.0个月(95%:10.8-15.1个月),<0.001]。多因素Cox风险回归模型分析显示,远处肿瘤转移(=1.414,95%:1.253-1.725)、非一线双免疫治疗(=1.412,95%:1.184-1.652)和肿瘤突变负荷<10 mut/Mb(=1.328,95%:1.151-1.546)是PFS的危险因素,而非鳞癌(=0.917,95% 0.823-0.984)是PFS的保护因素。41例(67.2%)发生免疫相关不良反应,其中3-4级不良反应21例(32.8%)。8例(13.1%)患者停止治疗,无死亡病例。纳武利尤单抗联合伊匹木单抗双免疫疗法可作为驱动基因及PD-L1双阴性晚期NSCLC的一种治疗选择。远处肿瘤转移、非一线双免疫治疗和肿瘤突变负荷<10 mut/Mb是影响患者PFS的危险因素,而非鳞状细胞癌是影响患者PFS的保护因素。