• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[驱动基因和程序性死亡配体-1双阴性晚期非小细胞肺癌患者双重免疫治疗的疗效与安全性分析]

[Analysis of the efficacy and safety of dual immunotherapy in patients with driver gene and programmed death ligand-1 double negative advanced non-small cell lung cancer].

作者信息

Luan T, Xie X H, Lin X Q, Deng H Y, Li Y J, Sun J L, Yang G, Zhang Y H, Wang S Y, Wang C C, Zhong N S, Zhou C Z

机构信息

Department of Oncology Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou 510120, China.

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Kunming University of Science and Technology Affiliated Hospital, Yunnan First People's Hospital, Kunming 650000, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2024 Aug 6;104(30):2797-2804. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20240528-01209.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20240528-01209
PMID:39085146
Abstract

To discuss the efficacy and safety of the dual immunotherapy of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who are double negative for driver gene and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. We conducted a retrospective collection of clinical data for 61 patients with advanced NSCLC who were negative for both driver genes and PD-L1 and received dual immunotherapy with nivolumab plus ipilimumab at the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University from January 2019 to June 2023. Based on treatment conditions, patients were divided into first-line and non-first-line dual immunotherapy groups. Patients were followed up monthly, with the follow-up period ending on October 1, 2023. The efficacy was evaluated using Solid Tumor Response Evaluation Criteria, and adverse reactions were assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events developed by the National Cancer Institute in the United States. Survival curves were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the log-rank test was used to compare the differences in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between first-line and non-first-line dual immunotherapy patients. The influence factors of PFS were analyzed using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model. Among the 61 NSCLC patients, 49 were male (80.3%), with an age range of 23-88 years [(65.3±7.4) years]. There were 14 cases (23.0%) classified as stage ⅢC and 47 cases (77.0%) classified as stage Ⅳ according to TNM staging. Forty cases (65.6%) received non-first-line treatment. The objective response rate (ORR) was 24.6% (15/61), and the disease control rate (DCR) was 52.5% (32/61). All 61 patients were followed up, with a median follow-up time of 17.8 months. The median PFS was 6.0 months (95%: 5.5-6.4 months), and the median OS was 17.0 months (95%: 14.8-19.2 months). For patients receiving first-line dual immunotherapy, the median PFS was longer than for those receiving non-first-line dual immunotherapy [7.0 months (95%: 6.0-7.9 months) vs 4.0 months (95%: 3.3-4.6 months), <0.001]; similarly, the median OS for patients receiving first-line dual immunotherapy was longer than for those receiving non-first-line dual immunotherapy [19.0 months (95%: 18.1-19.9 months) vs 13.0 months (95%: 10.8-15.1 months), <0.001]. Multivariate Cox risk regression model analysis showed that distant tumor metastasis (=1.414, 95%: 1.253-1.725), non-first-line dual immunotherapy (=1.412, 95%: 1.184-1.652), and tumor mutation burden<10 mut/Mb (=1.328, 95%: 1.151-1.546) were risk factors for PFS, while non-squamous carcinoma (=0.917, 95% 0.823-0.984) was a protective factor for PFS. Immune-related adverse reactions occurred in 41 cases (67.2%), including 21 cases (32.8%) of grade 3-4 adverse reactions. Eight cases (13.1%) discontinued treatment, and there were no deaths. Dual immunotherapy with nivolumab plus ipilimumab can be a treatment option for driver gene and PD-L1 double-negative advanced NSCLC. Distant tumor metastasis, non-first-line dual immunotherapy, and tumor mutation burden<10 mut/Mb are risk factors affecting patients' PFS, while non-squamous cell carcinoma is a protective factor affecting patients' PFS.

摘要

探讨纳武利尤单抗联合伊匹木单抗双免疫疗法治疗驱动基因及程序性死亡配体1(PD-L1)表达均为阴性的晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的疗效及安全性。我们回顾性收集了2019年1月至2023年6月在广州医科大学附属第一医院接受纳武利尤单抗联合伊匹木单抗双免疫疗法治疗的61例驱动基因及PD-L1均为阴性的晚期NSCLC患者的临床资料。根据治疗情况,将患者分为一线双免疫治疗组和非一线双免疫治疗组。每月对患者进行随访,随访期至2023年10月1日结束。采用实体瘤疗效评价标准评估疗效,根据美国国立癌症研究所制定的《不良事件通用术语标准》评估不良反应。采用Kaplan-Meier法绘制生存曲线,采用对数秩检验比较一线和非一线双免疫治疗患者的无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)差异。采用多因素Cox比例风险回归模型分析PFS的影响因素。61例NSCLC患者中,男性49例(80.3%),年龄范围为23-88岁[(65.3±7.4)岁]。根据TNM分期,ⅢC期14例(23.0%),Ⅳ期47例(77.0%)。40例(65.6%)接受非一线治疗。客观缓解率(ORR)为24.6%(15/61),疾病控制率(DCR)为52.5%(32/61)。61例患者均获随访,中位随访时间为17.8个月。中位PFS为6.0个月(95%:5.5-6.4个月),中位OS为17.0个月(95%:14.8-19.2个月)。接受一线双免疫治疗的患者中位PFS长于接受非一线双免疫治疗的患者[7.0个月(95%:6.0-7.9个月) vs 4.0个月(95%:3.3-4.6个月),<0.001];同样,接受一线双免疫治疗的患者中位OS长于接受非一线双免疫治疗的患者[19.0个月(95%:18.1-19.9个月) vs 13.0个月(95%:10.8-15.1个月),<0.001]。多因素Cox风险回归模型分析显示,远处肿瘤转移(=1.414,95%:1.253-1.725)、非一线双免疫治疗(=1.412,95%:1.184-1.652)和肿瘤突变负荷<10 mut/Mb(=1.328,95%:1.151-1.546)是PFS的危险因素,而非鳞癌(=0.917,95% 0.823-0.984)是PFS的保护因素。41例(67.2%)发生免疫相关不良反应,其中3-4级不良反应21例(32.8%)。8例(13.1%)患者停止治疗,无死亡病例。纳武利尤单抗联合伊匹木单抗双免疫疗法可作为驱动基因及PD-L1双阴性晚期NSCLC的一种治疗选择。远处肿瘤转移、非一线双免疫治疗和肿瘤突变负荷<10 mut/Mb是影响患者PFS的危险因素,而非鳞状细胞癌是影响患者PFS的保护因素。

相似文献

1
[Analysis of the efficacy and safety of dual immunotherapy in patients with driver gene and programmed death ligand-1 double negative advanced non-small cell lung cancer].[驱动基因和程序性死亡配体-1双阴性晚期非小细胞肺癌患者双重免疫治疗的疗效与安全性分析]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2024 Aug 6;104(30):2797-2804. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20240528-01209.
2
Single or combined immune checkpoint inhibitors compared to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab for people with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.比较单药或联合免疫检查点抑制剂与含或不含贝伐珠单抗的一线含铂化疗方案用于晚期非小细胞肺癌患者。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 14;12(12):CD013257. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013257.pub2.
3
Single or combined immune checkpoint inhibitors compared to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab for people with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.比较单药或联合免疫检查点抑制剂与一线含或不含贝伐珠单抗的铂类化疗方案用于晚期非小细胞肺癌患者。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 30;4(4):CD013257. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013257.pub3.
4
First-Line Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (CheckMate 568): Outcomes by Programmed Death Ligand 1 and Tumor Mutational Burden as Biomarkers.纳武利尤单抗联合伊匹单抗一线治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌(CheckMate 568):程序性死亡配体 1 和肿瘤突变负荷作为生物标志物的结果。
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Apr 20;37(12):992-1000. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.01042. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
5
[Efficacy and influencing factors of immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy and bevacizumab in patients with non-small cell lung cancer after epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors treatment failure].表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗失败后免疫治疗联合化疗及贝伐单抗治疗非小细胞肺癌患者的疗效及影响因素
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2023 Apr 25;103(16):1210-1216. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20221101-02275.
6
Comparison of efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 combination therapy in first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC: an updated systematic review and network meta-analysis.比较 PD-1/PD-L1 联合疗法在晚期 NSCLC 一线治疗中的疗效和安全性:一项更新的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2024 Oct;26(10):2488-2502. doi: 10.1007/s12094-024-03442-3. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
7
[Real-world study on the efficacy and prognostic predictive biomarker of patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer treated with programmed death-1/programmed death ligand 1 inhibitors].[程序性死亡蛋白1/程序性死亡配体1抑制剂治疗转移性非小细胞肺癌患者的疗效及预后预测生物标志物的真实世界研究]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2022 May 23;44(5):416-424. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20210709-00504.
8
Real-world evidenceand clinical observations of the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors.真实世界证据和 PD-1/PD-L1 抑制剂治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床观察。
Sci Rep. 2019 Mar 12;9(1):4278. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-40748-7.
9
Association of Survival and Immune-Related Biomarkers With Immunotherapy in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-analysis and Individual Patient-Level Analysis.免疫治疗与非小细胞肺癌患者生存及免疫相关生物标志物的相关性:一项荟萃分析和个体患者水平分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jul 3;2(7):e196879. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.6879.
10
[The efficacy and prognostic factors of immunotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with different driver gene mutations].[免疫疗法在不同驱动基因突变的晚期非小细胞肺癌患者中的疗效及预后因素]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2022 Apr 5;102(13):922-929. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20211025-02352.