• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在多发性骨髓瘤患者的自体干细胞移植中使用和不使用普乐沙福的动员策略。

Mobilization strategies with and without plerixafor for autologous stem cell transplant in patients with multiple myeloma.

机构信息

Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, 10029, USA.

University of Colorado - Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.

出版信息

Bone Marrow Transplant. 2024 Oct;59(10):1440-1448. doi: 10.1038/s41409-024-02385-1. Epub 2024 Jul 31.

DOI:10.1038/s41409-024-02385-1
PMID:39085373
Abstract

Autologous stem cell transplantation is a standard treatment strategy for patients with multiple myeloma that requires effective mobilization and apheresis of peripheral blood progenitor cells; however, in the current era of novel myeloma induction therapies, the optimal mobilization regimen to enhance stem cell yield while limiting toxicity and resource utilization remains unknown. In this multicenter retrospective study, we assessed apheresis and transplant outcomes in myeloma patients mobilized with granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) alone (n = 62), G-CSF with chemotherapy (n = 43), or G-CSF with the CXCR4 antagonist plerixafor (n = 417). Compared to patients treated with G-CSF alone, the plerixafor group required significantly fewer median apheresis sessions (1 vs 2, p = 0.0023) with higher CD34+ stem cell yield (9.9 vs 5.8 × 10 cells/kg, p < 0.001) and had significantly faster engraftment of neutrophils (HR 1.54, 95% CI 1.17-2.03) and platelets (HR 2.24, 95% CI 1.69-2.96) after transplant. Additionally, the plerixafor group showed a significantly better toxicity profile and lower adverse event rate than patients treated with G-CSF alone (p = 0.0028) or chemomobilization (p < 0.0001), with a trend toward reduced survival in chemomobilization patients. Taken together, these data support the routine use of plerixafor-based mobilization to increase apheresis efficiency and reduce toxicity in myeloma patients undergoing transplant.

摘要

自体干细胞移植是多发性骨髓瘤患者的标准治疗策略,需要有效动员和采集外周血祖细胞;然而,在新型骨髓瘤诱导治疗时代,增强干细胞产量而限制毒性和资源利用的最佳动员方案仍不清楚。在这项多中心回顾性研究中,我们评估了单独使用粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)(n=62)、G-CSF 联合化疗(n=43)或 G-CSF 联合 CXCR4 拮抗剂培利西林(plerixafor)(n=417)动员的骨髓瘤患者的采集和移植结果。与单独使用 G-CSF 治疗的患者相比,培利西林组需要的中位数采集次数明显更少(1 次对 2 次,p=0.0023),CD34+干细胞产量更高(9.9 对 5.8×10 个细胞/kg,p<0.001),中性粒细胞(HR 1.54,95%CI 1.17-2.03)和血小板(HR 2.24,95%CI 1.69-2.96)移植后的植入更快。此外,与单独使用 G-CSF 或化疗动员治疗的患者(p=0.0028)或化疗动员治疗的患者(p<0.0001)相比,培利西林组的毒性谱明显更好,不良事件发生率更低,且化疗动员治疗的患者的生存情况呈下降趋势。总之,这些数据支持常规使用基于培利西林的动员来提高多发性骨髓瘤患者移植的采集效率和降低毒性。

相似文献

1
Mobilization strategies with and without plerixafor for autologous stem cell transplant in patients with multiple myeloma.在多发性骨髓瘤患者的自体干细胞移植中使用和不使用普乐沙福的动员策略。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2024 Oct;59(10):1440-1448. doi: 10.1038/s41409-024-02385-1. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
2
Plerixafor plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor versus placebo plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for mobilization of CD34(+) hematopoietic stem cells in patients with multiple myeloma and low peripheral blood CD34(+) cell count: results of a subset analysis of a randomized trial.培洛昔福联合粒细胞集落刺激因子与安慰剂联合粒细胞集落刺激因子动员多发性骨髓瘤且外周血 CD34+细胞计数低的患者中的 CD34+造血干细胞:一项随机试验的亚组分析结果。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2012 Oct;18(10):1564-72. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2012.05.017. Epub 2012 Jun 6.
3
A prospective, multicenter study on hematopoietic stemcell mobilization with cyclophosphamide plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and 'on-demand' plerixafor in multiple myeloma patients treated with novel agents.一项关于新型药物治疗多发性骨髓瘤患者用环磷酰胺联合粒细胞集落刺激因子和按需使用plerixafor进行造血干细胞动员的前瞻性、多中心研究。
Haematologica. 2024 May 1;109(5):1525-1534. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2023.284023.
4
Additional plerixafor to granulocyte colony-stimulating factors for haematopoietic stem cell mobilisation for autologous transplantation in people with malignant lymphoma or multiple myeloma.在恶性淋巴瘤或多发性骨髓瘤患者中,在使用粒细胞集落刺激因子的基础上加用普乐沙福用于造血干细胞动员以进行自体移植。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Oct 20;2015(10):CD010615. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010615.pub2.
5
Optimizing autologous stem cell collections for patients with multiple myeloma receiving G-CSF and Plerixafor: A single center project.优化接受 G-CSF 和普乐沙福的多发性骨髓瘤患者的自体干细胞采集:一项单中心项目。
J Clin Apher. 2024 Jun;39(3):e22127. doi: 10.1002/jca.22127.
6
Plerixafor (Mozobil) alone to mobilize hematopoietic stem cells from multiple myeloma patients for autologous transplantation.培洛昔福(莫佐比勒)单药动员多发性骨髓瘤患者的造血干细胞进行自体移植。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2010 May;16(5):695-700. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2009.12.538. Epub 2010 Jan 11.
7
Phase I/II Study of Intravenous Plerixafor Added to a Mobilization Regimen of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor in Lymphoma Patients Undergoing Autologous Stem Cell Collection.淋巴瘤患者自体干细胞采集时,粒细胞集落刺激因子联合静脉注射普乐沙福的 I/II 期研究
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2017 Aug;23(8):1282-1289. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2017.04.024. Epub 2017 May 2.
8
Stem Cell Mobilization in Multiple Myeloma: Comparing Safety and Efficacy of Cyclophosphamide +/- Plerixafor versus Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor +/- Plerixafor in the Lenalidomide Era.多发性骨髓瘤中的干细胞动员:来那度胺时代环磷酰胺 +/- 培洛昔芬与粒细胞集落刺激因子 +/- 培洛昔芬的安全性和疗效比较。
Transplant Cell Ther. 2021 Jul;27(7):590.e1-590.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2021.04.016. Epub 2021 Apr 26.
9
Successful Mobilization of Autologous Hematopoietic Peripheral Blood Stem Cells after Salvage Chemotherapy in Patients with Low CD34 Blood Cell Counts.低 CD34 血细胞计数患者挽救性化疗后自体造血外周血干细胞的成功动员。
Transplant Cell Ther. 2022 Nov;28(11):754-759. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2022.08.017. Epub 2022 Aug 22.
10
A comparison of chemo-free strategy with G-CSF plus plerixafor on demand versus intermediate-dose cyclophosphamide and G-CSF as PBSC mobilization in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients: An Italian explorative cost Analysis.新诊断多发性骨髓瘤患者中无化疗策略与按需 G-CSF 联合普乐沙福与中剂量环磷酰胺和 G-CSF 作为 PBSC 动员的比较:意大利探索性成本分析。
Transfus Apher Sci. 2020 Oct;59(5):102819. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2020.102819. Epub 2020 May 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma: challenges, strategies, and current developments.多发性骨髓瘤中的干细胞动员:挑战、策略和最新进展。
Ann Hematol. 2023 May;102(5):995-1009. doi: 10.1007/s00277-023-05170-0. Epub 2023 Mar 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody impairs CD34+ mobilization and affects clonogenic potential in multiple myeloma patients.抗 CD38 单克隆抗体可损害多发性骨髓瘤患者 CD34+细胞的动员,并影响其集落形成能力。
Blood Transfus. 2024 Jul;22(4):328-337. doi: 10.2450/BloodTransfus.667.
2
A German-Wide Systematic Study on Mobilization and Collection of Hematopoietic Stem Cells in Poor Mobilizer Patients with Multiple Myeloma prior to Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation.一项关于德国范围内多发性骨髓瘤动员不佳患者在自体干细胞移植前造血干细胞动员与采集的系统性研究。
Transfus Med Hemother. 2023 Oct 16;50(6):475-490. doi: 10.1159/000531935. eCollection 2023 Dec.
3
Stem cell collection after lenalidomide, bortezomib and dexamethasone plus elotuzumab or isatuximab in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients: a single centre experience from the GMMG-HD6 and -HD7 trials.
来那度胺、硼替佐米和地塞米松联合依鲁替尼或伊沙妥昔单抗治疗初诊多发性骨髓瘤患者后的干细胞采集:来自 GMMG-HD6 和 -HD7 试验的单中心经验。
BMC Cancer. 2023 Nov 21;23(1):1132. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11507-9.
4
Impact of daratumumab on stem cell mobilization and collection, engraftment and early post-transplant complications among multiple myeloma patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation.达雷妥尤单抗对多发性骨髓瘤患者自体干细胞移植中干细胞动员和采集、植入和移植后早期并发症的影响。
Leuk Lymphoma. 2023 Dec;64(13):2140-2147. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2023.2253479. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
5
Efficacy, safety, and cost of mobilization strategies in multiple myeloma: a prospective, observational study.多发性骨髓瘤动员策略的疗效、安全性及成本:一项前瞻性观察性研究
Haematologica. 2023 Aug 1;108(8):2249-2254. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2022.282269.
6
Multiple myeloma current treatment algorithms.多发性骨髓瘤现行治疗方案。
Blood Cancer J. 2020 Sep 28;10(9):94. doi: 10.1038/s41408-020-00359-2.
7
Hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization with "just-in-time" plerixafor approach is a cost-effective alternative to routine plerixafor use.采用“即时”普乐沙福方案进行造血祖细胞动员是常规使用普乐沙福的一种经济有效的替代方法。
Cytotherapy. 2015 Dec;17(12):1785-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2015.09.002. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
8
Cyclophosphamide-based hematopoietic stem cell mobilization before autologous stem cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.新诊断多发性骨髓瘤患者自体干细胞移植前基于环磷酰胺的造血干细胞动员
J Clin Apher. 2015 Jun;30(3):176-82. doi: 10.1002/jca.21360. Epub 2014 Oct 8.
9
Peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma patients treat in the novel therapy-era with plerixafor and G-CSF has superior efficacy but significantly higher costs compared to mobilization with low-dose cyclophosphamide and G-CSF.在新型治疗时代,使用普乐沙福和粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)动员多发性骨髓瘤患者的外周血干细胞,与使用低剂量环磷酰胺和G-CSF进行动员相比,具有更高的疗效,但成本显著更高。
J Clin Apher. 2013 Oct;28(5):359-67. doi: 10.1002/jca.21280. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
10
Efficacy and cost-benefit analysis of risk-adaptive use of plerixafor for autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization.风险适应性使用普乐沙福进行自体造血祖细胞动员的疗效和成本效益分析。
Transfusion. 2012 Jan;52(1):55-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03206.x. Epub 2011 Jun 9.