Effect of no-touch versus conventional technique on arteriovenous fistula outcomes: a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND

Autologous arteriovenous fistulae (AVFs) are the best type of vascular access in patients with kidney failure. However, the conventional technique has a high failure rate. We performed a randomised controlled trial to investigate whether the no-touch technique has a higher maturation and patency rate than that of the conventional technique for creating AVFs.

METHODS

This study was a single-centre randomised controlled trial involving patients with kidney failure requiring an AVF for haemodialysis access. A total of 179 patients undergoing their first radial artery-cephalic fistula were randomized 1:1 to the no-touch technique (n = 90) or conventional technique (n = 89). The maturation and patency rate of the two techniques were compared and analysed.

RESULTS

The preoperative baseline data showed no differences between groups. When comparing the no-touch technique to the conventional technique, the maturation rate was 93% vs. 89% and the 1-year primary function patency was 72% vs. 62%, respectively. Factors associated with AVF failure included age > 55 years (OR = 2.417, 95% CI 1.242-4.703), female sex (OR = 2.149, 95% CI 1.099-4.202), and vein diameter ≤ 1.8 mm (OR = 3.664, 95% CI 1.714-7.832). For patients with small veins the maturation rate was 92.98% vs. 80% and the 1-year primary function patency was 68.42% vs. 40% for the no-touch technique and conventional technique, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The no-touch technique has a higher maturation and patency rate than the conventional technique for creating an autologous AVF, especially in patients with small veins. This technique may provide a better outcome for patients with small cephalic veins.