Department of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2024 Dec;24(6):1186-1201. doi: 10.3758/s13415-024-01207-7. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
In everyday life, humans perform sequences of tasks. These tasks may be disrupted in people with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Symptoms, such as compulsions, can be considered sequential and often cause repetitions of tasks that disrupt daily living (e.g., checking the stove while cooking). Motor sequences have been used to study behavioral deficits in OCD. However, not all sequences are motor sequences. Some are more "abstract" in that they are composed of a series of tasks (e.g., chopping and stirring) rather than being dependent on individual actions or stimuli. These abstract task sequences require cognitive control mechanisms for their execution. Although theory has proposed deficits in these sequences in OCD as well, they have not been directly investigated. We tested the hypotheses that OCD participants exhibit deficits in the control mechanisms specific to abstract task sequences and more general flexible behavior (measured with task switching within the sequences), relative to health controls (HCs) and clinical controls (participants with anxiety disorders [ANX]). A total of 112 participants completed abstract task sequences consisting of simple categorization tasks. Surprisingly, participants with OCD did not perform worse than HCs or ANX. However, ANX participants showed impairments specific to sequential control that did not extend to more general flexible control. Thus, we showed a novel behavioral dissociation between OCD and ANX specific to abstract task sequential control. These results also implicate deficits in specific frontal sequential control neural circuitry in ANX and not in OCD, where implicit sequential deficits may more closely align with striatal circuits.
在日常生活中,人类会执行一系列任务。患有强迫症 (OCD) 的人可能会打乱这些任务。症状,如强迫行为,可以被认为是序列性的,常常导致打乱日常生活的任务重复(例如,在做饭时检查炉灶)。运动序列已被用于研究 OCD 中的行为缺陷。然而,并非所有序列都是运动序列。有些序列更“抽象”,它们由一系列任务组成(例如,切菜和搅拌),而不是依赖于单个动作或刺激。这些抽象任务序列需要认知控制机制来执行。尽管理论上也提出 OCD 中这些序列存在缺陷,但尚未直接进行研究。我们测试了以下假设:与健康对照组 (HC) 和临床对照组(焦虑障碍患者 [ANX])相比,OCD 参与者在执行抽象任务序列和更普遍的灵活行为(通过序列内的任务转换来衡量)的特定控制机制方面存在缺陷。共有 112 名参与者完成了由简单分类任务组成的抽象任务序列。令人惊讶的是,OCD 参与者的表现并不逊于 HC 或 ANX。然而,ANX 参与者表现出特定于序列控制的障碍,而这些障碍并不延伸到更普遍的灵活控制。因此,我们在 OCD 和 ANX 之间表现出了一种新的行为分离,这种分离特定于抽象任务序列控制。这些结果还暗示了 ANX 中特定于前额叶序列控制的神经回路存在缺陷,而 OCD 中则没有,在 OCD 中,内隐序列缺陷可能更接近纹状体回路。