• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

身体创伤患者的健康素养:使用德国简易功能性健康素养测试评估门诊患者的一般理解能力。

Health literacy in physical trauma patients : Evaluation of the general understanding of patients in an outpatient clinic using the German Short Test of Functional Health Literacy.

机构信息

Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2024 Oct;136(19-20):540-546. doi: 10.1007/s00508-024-02389-3. Epub 2024 Jul 31.

DOI:10.1007/s00508-024-02389-3
PMID:39085647
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11464547/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Health literacy (HL) refers to the ability to understand and process information provided by the healthcare system and depends on various factors, such as language comprehension, education, and social environment. Low HL was recently associated with increased readmission, morbidity, and mortality. Little is known about HL levels in physical trauma patients. The aim of this study was to determine general HL in physical trauma patients in an outpatient setting and to evaluate possible differences based on demographic characteristics.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 100 physical trauma patients were recruited in the outpatient trauma facility of the Medical University of Vienna. All recruited patients completed the German Short Test of Functional Health Literacy (S-TOFHLA).

RESULTS

The evaluated HL index ranged between 20 and 36 points (highest achievable score: 36 points), with the mean value calculated at 34.3 (adequate). Out of 100 participants, 97 patients (97%) showed adequate HL and 3 patients (3%) reached a score corresponding to a marginal understanding. No patient showed inadequate HL utilizing the S‑TOFHLA tool. No significant differences were found between different demographic categories, including age, education level, native language, and injury location.

CONCLUSION

In this study, included outpatient trauma patients demonstrated an overall adequate understanding of healthcare related information. Age, sociodemographic background, and/or educational status did not influence performance, which leads to the question as to whether the German version of the S‑TOFHLA is valid to representatively measure HL in these patients. Furthermore, regarding the obvious shortcomings of the S‑TOFHLA, the education standard of the respective population should be taken into consideration when choosing an appropriate testing tool.

摘要

背景

健康素养(HL)是指理解和处理医疗保健系统提供的信息的能力,取决于语言理解能力、教育程度和社会环境等多种因素。最近,HL 水平较低与再入院率、发病率和死亡率增加有关。关于身体创伤患者的 HL 水平知之甚少。本研究旨在确定门诊身体创伤患者的一般 HL,并评估基于人口统计学特征的可能差异。

材料和方法

共招募了 100 名在维也纳医科大学门诊创伤中心的身体创伤患者。所有入组患者均完成了德国短期功能性健康素养测试(S-TOFHLA)。

结果

评估的 HL 指数范围在 20 至 36 分之间(最高得分为 36 分),平均值为 34.3(适当)。在 100 名参与者中,97 名患者(97%)表现出适当的 HL,3 名患者(3%)的得分对应于边缘理解。使用 S-TOFHLA 工具没有患者表现出 HL 不足。不同人口统计学类别(包括年龄、教育水平、母语和受伤部位)之间没有发现显著差异。

结论

在这项研究中,包括门诊创伤患者在内的所有患者对与医疗保健相关的信息都有足够的理解。年龄、社会人口统计学背景和/或教育程度并未影响表现,这引发了一个问题,即德国版 S-TOFHLA 是否能够代表这些患者的 HL 进行有效测量。此外,鉴于 S-TOFHLA 的明显缺陷,在选择适当的测试工具时,应考虑到相关人群的教育水平。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59f1/11464547/a624dc5d8507/508_2024_2389_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59f1/11464547/a624dc5d8507/508_2024_2389_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59f1/11464547/a624dc5d8507/508_2024_2389_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Health literacy in physical trauma patients : Evaluation of the general understanding of patients in an outpatient clinic using the German Short Test of Functional Health Literacy.身体创伤患者的健康素养:使用德国简易功能性健康素养测试评估门诊患者的一般理解能力。
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2024 Oct;136(19-20):540-546. doi: 10.1007/s00508-024-02389-3. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
2
[Health literacy of adults in Germany: Findings from the German Health Update (GEDA) study].[德国成年人的健康素养:德国健康更新(GEDA)研究的结果]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2015 Sep;58(9):942-50. doi: 10.1007/s00103-015-2200-z.
3
Functional health literacy in Switzerland--validation of a German, Italian, and French health literacy test.瑞士的功能性健康素养——对德语、意大利语和法语健康素养测试的验证。
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Jan;90(1):12-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.08.018. Epub 2012 Oct 23.
4
The health literacy of hospitalized trauma patients: We should be screening for deficiencies.创伤住院患者的健康素养:我们应筛查其缺陷。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019 Nov;87(5):1214-1219. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002465.
5
[Health literacy and diabetes control in patients attending a university outpatient clinic in Argentina].[阿根廷一家大学门诊诊所患者的健康素养与糖尿病控制]
Medicina (B Aires). 2017;77(3):167-172.
6
Promoting Health Literacy in the Workplace Among Civil Servants: Cross-Sectional Study.促进公务员工作场所健康素养:横断面研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Aug 15;10:e58942. doi: 10.2196/58942.
7
Comparison of Cancer-specific and General Health Literacy Assessments in an Educated Population: Correlations and Modifying Factors.受过教育人群中癌症特异性与一般健康素养评估的比较:相关性及影响因素
J Cancer Educ. 2016 Jun;31(2):268-71. doi: 10.1007/s13187-015-0816-1.
8
Does acculturation narrow the health literacy gap between immigrants and non-immigrants-An explorative study.文化适应是否会缩小移民与非移民之间的健康素养差距——一项探索性研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Apr;100(4):760-767. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.10.021. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
9
Determinants of health literacy in the general population: results of the Catalan health survey.一般人群健康素养的决定因素:加泰罗尼亚健康调查结果。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Aug 16;19(1):1122. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7381-1.
10
Evaluation of a health literacy screening tool in primary care patients: evidence from Serbia.初级保健患者健康素养筛查工具的评估:来自塞尔维亚的证据。
Health Promot Int. 2014 Dec;29(4):601-7. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dat011. Epub 2013 Feb 27.

本文引用的文献

1
A Framework of AI-Based Approaches to Improving eHealth Literacy and Combating Infodemic.基于人工智能的方法框架,用于提高电子健康素养和应对信息疫情。
Front Public Health. 2021 Nov 30;9:755808. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.755808. eCollection 2021.
2
Health literacy for children and families.儿童和家庭健康素养。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Oct;88(10):4328-4336. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14948. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
3
Prospective Evaluation of Health Literacy and Its Impact on Outcomes in Emergency General Surgery.前瞻性评估健康素养及其对急诊普通外科结局的影响。
J Surg Res. 2021 May;261:343-350. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.12.047. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
4
Health Information Seeking Among Immigrant Families in Western Canada.加拿大西部的移民家庭的健康信息寻求。
J Pediatr Nurs. 2021 May-Jun;58:9-14. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2020.11.009. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
5
Health Literacy and Health Service Use in Germany.德国的健康素养与医疗服务利用情况
Health Lit Res Pract. 2018 Jun 12;2(2):e115-e122. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20180503-01. eCollection 2018 Apr.
6
Communication with Diverse Patients: Addressing Culture and Language.与不同患者的沟通:处理文化和语言差异。
Pediatr Clin North Am. 2019 Aug;66(4):791-804. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2019.03.006. Epub 2019 May 23.
7
Low health literacy: Implications for managing cardiac patients in practice.低健康素养:对实际管理心脏病患者的影响。
Nurse Pract. 2018 Aug;43(8):49-55. doi: 10.1097/01.NPR.0000541468.54290.49.
8
Differences in Characteristics and Outcome of Patients with Penetrating Injuries in the USA and the Netherlands: A Multi-institutional Comparison.美国和荷兰穿透伤患者的特征及结局差异:一项多机构比较研究
World J Surg. 2018 Nov;42(11):3608-3615. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4669-8.
9
Health literacy and quality of physician-trauma patient communication: Opportunity for improvement.健康素养与医患沟通质量:改进的机会。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018 Jul;85(1):193-197. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001934.
10
Prospective evaluation of low health literacy and its impact on outcomes in trauma patients.前瞻性评估低健康素养及其对创伤患者结局的影响。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018 Jul;85(1):187-192. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001914.