Suppr超能文献

印度阿育吠陀疗法干预颈椎病和腰椎病的不良事件:一项系统评价

Adverse events in India's Ayush interventions for cervical and lumbar spondylosis: a systematic review.

作者信息

Ponnaiah Manickam, Elumalai Rajalakshmi, Muthappan Sendhilkumar, Jaisankar Saranya, Bagepally Bhavani Shankara, Sivaprakasam Satish, Parasuraman Ganeshkumar

机构信息

ICMR-National Institute of Epidemiology, R-127, TNHB, Ayapakkam, Chennai, 600077, Tamil Nadu, India.

出版信息

Eur J Med Res. 2024 Jul 31;29(1):396. doi: 10.1186/s40001-024-01985-3.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Low back and neck pain are common musculoskeletal disorders with multiple treatment options. India's traditional medical systems, known as Ayush (Ayurveda, Yoga and Naturopathy, Unani, Siddha, Sowa-Rigpa and Homoeopathy) offer range of interventions and are widely used. In view of limited documentation of adverse events following Ayush interventions for lumbar and cervical spondylosis, we synthesized evidence and estimated proportion of studies reporting adverse events.

METHODS

We systematically searched all published documents from biomedical and multidisciplinary abstract and citation databases and Ayush-specific repositories from their inception to April 2021. We selected studies as per inclusion criteria and extracted information, adhering to PRISMA guidelines. We systematically reviewed the qualitative evidence form the selected studies.

RESULTS

Majority (94%) of the selected 113 studies were interventional studies and included 77 (68.1%) journal articles and 35 (31%) academic dissertations. Among the Ayush systems, considerable proportion was from Ayurveda (32.7%), followed by Siddha (24.8%), Yoga (22.1%), Unani (15.9%) and Homoeopathy (4.4%). Almost three-fourths of the studies were on lumbar spondylosis (65%; n = 74), followed by cervical spondylosis (31%; n = 35), and the remaining four included both. Thirteen percent of the 113 studies described adverse events [Yoga = 9.7%; Unani = 1.8% and Homoeopathy = 1.8%]. More adverse events were reported among the studies on lumbar (9.7%) than cervical spondylosis (2.7%). The nature of interventions were non-pharmacological (10.6%; n = 12), pharmacological (n = 2; 1.8%) or combined (n = 1; 0.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Only one in eight studies reported any adverse event following Ayush interventions for cervical and lumbar spondylosis. There could be certain degree of underreporting of adverse events and requires further exploration. PROSPERO Registration ID CRD42020167433.

摘要

引言

腰背痛和颈痛是常见的肌肉骨骼疾病,有多种治疗选择。印度的传统医学体系,即阿育吠陀(Ayurveda)、瑜伽与自然疗法(Yoga and Naturopathy)、尤那尼医学(Unani)、悉达医学(Siddha)、索瓦日巴医学(Sowa-Rigpa)和顺势疗法(Homoeopathy)(统称为阿育吠陀医学体系Ayush)提供了一系列干预措施,且被广泛使用。鉴于阿育吠陀医学体系对腰椎和颈椎病干预后不良事件的记录有限,我们综合了相关证据并估计了报告不良事件的研究比例。

方法

我们系统检索了生物医学和多学科摘要及引文数据库以及阿育吠陀医学体系特定知识库自创建至2021年4月发表的所有文献。我们根据纳入标准选择研究并提取信息,遵循系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南。我们系统回顾了所选研究的定性证据。

结果

在所选的113项研究中,大多数(94%)为干预性研究,包括77篇(68.1%)期刊文章和35篇(31%)学术论文。在阿育吠陀医学体系中,相当一部分来自阿育吠陀(32.7%),其次是悉达医学(24.8%)、瑜伽(22.1%)、尤那尼医学(15.9%)和顺势疗法(4.4%)。几乎四分之三的研究针对腰椎间盘突出症(65%;n = 74),其次是颈椎病(31%;n = 35),其余四项研究涉及两者。113项研究中有13%描述了不良事件[瑜伽 = 9.7%;尤那尼医学 = 1.8%;顺势疗法 = 1.8%]。腰椎间盘突出症研究中报告的不良事件(9.7%)多于颈椎病研究(2.7%)。干预措施的性质为非药物性(10.6%;n = 12)、药物性(n = 2;1.8%)或联合性(n = 1;0.9%)。

结论

在阿育吠陀医学体系对颈椎和腰椎间盘突出症的干预措施中,只有八分之一的研究报告了任何不良事件。不良事件可能存在一定程度的报告不足,需要进一步探索。国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(PROSPERO)注册号:CRD42020167433。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6e3/11290003/d4ea89b657a5/40001_2024_1985_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验