Suppr超能文献

一线免疫检查点抑制剂联合抗血管生成药物治疗 Kirsten 大鼠肉瘤病毒抗原突变型晚期非小细胞肺癌的疗效:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。

Efficacy of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor and anti-angiogenic agent combination therapy for Kirsten rat sarcoma viral antigen-mutant advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Respiratory Medicine, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Center for Clinical Sciences, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Thorac Cancer. 2024 Sep;15(25):1854-1862. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.15413. Epub 2024 Jul 31.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recent advancements in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment have significantly improved primary therapy outcomes owing to the emergence of various molecular targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, for Kirsten rat sarcoma viral antigen (KRAS) mutations, molecular targeted drugs, such as sotorasib, are not applicable as first-line treatments, and the optimal primary treatment remains unclear. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the efficacy of ICI combination therapy as first-line treatment for KRAS-mutant NSCLC.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search for phase 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that presented data on KRAS mutation status in advanced NSCLC. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). A random-effects network meta-analysis was conducted to perform direct and indirect comparisons among treatment groups.

RESULTS

Six RCTs were eligible for inclusion. In the network meta-analysis for KRAS-mutant NSCLC, Chemo + bevacizumab (Bev) + ICI was associated with improved PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.22-0.64), followed by Chemo + ICI + ICI (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.47-0.93) and Chemo + ICI (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.49-0.91). The most beneficial effect on OS was observed with Chemo + Bev + ICI (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.34-0.73), followed by Chemo + ICI + ICI (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.48-0.87) and Chemo + ICI (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.56-0.92). Regarding OS in wild-type KRAS, ICI + ICI (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.50-1.07) produced the most favorable effects, followed by Chemo + ICI (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.63-0.99).

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of Chemo + Bev + ICI is potentially high for improving PFS and OS in KRAS-mutant NSCLC. In advanced NSCLC, the presence or absence of KRAS mutations may need to be considered when administering first-line treatment.

摘要

背景

由于各种分子靶向治疗和免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)的出现,晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)治疗的最新进展显著改善了初始治疗的结果。然而,对于 KRAS 突变,分子靶向药物,如索托拉西布,不适用于一线治疗,最佳的初始治疗仍不清楚。因此,我们旨在研究 ICI 联合治疗作为 KRAS 突变型 NSCLC 的一线治疗的疗效。

方法

我们对呈现晚期 NSCLC KRAS 突变状态数据的 III 期随机对照试验(RCT)进行了系统搜索。主要终点是无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。我们进行了随机效应网络荟萃分析,以对治疗组进行直接和间接比较。

结果

有 6 项 RCT 符合纳入标准。在 KRAS 突变型 NSCLC 的网络荟萃分析中,化疗+贝伐单抗(Bev)+ICI 与改善的 PFS 相关(风险比 [HR] 0.38,95%置信区间 [CI] 0.22-0.64),其次是化疗+ICI+ICI(HR 0.66,95%CI 0.47-0.93)和化疗+ICI(HR 0.67,95%CI 0.49-0.91)。OS 获益最大的是化疗+Bev+ICI(HR 0.50,95%CI 0.34-0.73),其次是化疗+ICI+ICI(HR 0.64,95%CI 0.48-0.87)和化疗+ICI(HR 0.72,95%CI 0.56-0.92)。对于野生型 KRAS 的 OS,ICI+ICI(HR 0.73,95%CI 0.50-1.07)产生的效果最好,其次是化疗+ICI(HR 0.79,95%CI 0.63-0.99)。

结论

化疗+Bev+ICI 可能对改善 KRAS 突变型 NSCLC 的 PFS 和 OS 具有很高的疗效。在晚期 NSCLC 中,一线治疗时可能需要考虑是否存在 KRAS 突变。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24e4/11367661/2a9027424ff2/TCA-15-1854-g005.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验