Suppr超能文献

全因死亡率和美国长寿兄弟姐妹的特定死因死亡:来自长寿家庭研究的数据。

All-Cause Mortality and Cause-Specific Death in U.S. Long-Lived Siblings: Data From the Long Life Family Study.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Biodemography, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

出版信息

J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2024 Nov 1;79(11). doi: 10.1093/gerona/glae190.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study compared the mortality risk of long-lived siblings with the U.S. population average and their spouse controls, and investigated the leading causes of death and the familial effect in death pattern.

METHODS

In the Long Life Family Study (LLFS), 1 264 proband siblings (mean age 90.1, standard deviation [SD] 6.4) and 172 spouses (83.8, 7.2) from 511 U.S.-based families were recruited and followed more than 12 years. Their survival function was compared with a birth cohort-, baseline age-, sex-, and race-matched pseudo sample from U.S. census data. To examine underlying and contributing causes, we examined in detail 338 deaths with complete death adjudication at the University of Pittsburgh Field Center through the year 2018. A familial effect on survival and death patterns was examined using mixed-effect models.

RESULTS

The LLFS siblings had better survival than the matched U.S. population average. They also had slightly but not significantly better survival than their spouses' (HR = 1.18 [95%CI 0.94-1.49]) after adjusting for age and sex. Age at death ranged from 75 to 104 years, mean 91.4. The leading causes of death were cardiovascular disease (33.1%), dementia (22.2%), and cancer (10.7%). Mixed effect model shows a significant random effect of family in survival, with adjustment of baseline age and sex. There was no significant familial effect in the underlying cause of death or conditions directly contributing to death among siblings recruited by the University of Pittsburgh Field Center.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings demonstrate a higher survival in the LLFS siblings than the U.S. census data, with a familial component of survival. We did not find significant correspondence in causes of death between siblings within families.

摘要

背景

本研究比较了长寿兄弟姐妹的死亡风险与美国人口平均水平及其配偶对照者的死亡风险,并探讨了死亡模式中的主要死亡原因和家族效应。

方法

在长寿家族研究(LLFS)中,我们招募了 511 个美国家庭中的 1264 名先证兄弟姐妹(平均年龄 90.1,标准差 [SD] 6.4)和 172 名配偶(83.8,7.2),并对他们进行了超过 12 年的随访。我们将他们的生存函数与美国人口普查数据中基于出生队列、基线年龄、性别和种族匹配的伪样本进行了比较。为了研究潜在和促成因素,我们通过 2018 年匹兹堡现场中心的详细死亡判决,详细研究了 338 例死亡病例。我们使用混合效应模型来研究生存和死亡模式中的家族效应。

结果

LLFS 兄弟姐妹的生存状况优于匹配的美国人口平均水平。在调整年龄和性别后,他们的生存状况也略好于配偶(HR=1.18[95%CI 0.94-1.49])。死亡年龄范围为 75 至 104 岁,平均年龄为 91.4 岁。主要死亡原因是心血管疾病(33.1%)、痴呆(22.2%)和癌症(10.7%)。混合效应模型显示,在调整基线年龄和性别后,生存存在显著的家族随机效应。在匹兹堡现场中心招募的兄弟姐妹中,没有发现家族因素对死亡的根本原因或直接导致死亡的条件有显著影响。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,LLFS 兄弟姐妹的生存状况优于美国人口普查数据,且存在家族生存因素。我们没有发现家庭内兄弟姐妹之间的死亡原因存在显著对应关系。

相似文献

4
Sertindole for schizophrenia.用于治疗精神分裂症的舍吲哚。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;2005(3):CD001715. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001715.pub2.

本文引用的文献

3
Association of Wealth With Longevity in US Adults at Midlife.美国成年人中年时期的财富与长寿的关联。
JAMA Health Forum. 2021 Jul 23;2(7):e211652. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.1652. eCollection 2021 Jul.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验