Doğan Necati, Büyükdoğan Halil
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Basaksehir Cam and Sakura City Hospital, Basaksehir Olimpiyat Bulvarı Yolu, Basaksehir, 34480 Istanbul, Turkey.
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Beykent University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Indian J Orthop. 2024 Jun 7;58(8):1134-1144. doi: 10.1007/s43465-024-01198-0. eCollection 2024 Aug.
Treatment failure remains a challenge in young femoral neck fractures treated with triple cannulated screws (TCS). This study aims to identify novel radiological parameters that can predict treatment failure and propose surgical techniques to enhance the success of TCS or aid in selecting alternative methods.
We conducted a retrospective analysis of 87 patients who underwent surgery for femoral neck fractures between February 2014 and June 2022, meeting the inclusion criteria. Patients achieving union were categorized as Non-Fail (Group 1), while those experiencing nonunion were categorized as Fail (Group 2). Various demographic and clinical factors were assessed, including age, gender, fracture side, and fracture classification (Garden and Pauwels). Radiological parameters such as fragmentation in the medial cortex, postoperative fracture displacement in the calcar region, collo-diaphyseal angle (CDA) difference (varus/valgus alignment), and several newly defined parameters (modified tip apex distance (m-TAD), tip cortex distance (TCD), upper-lower screw-cortex distance/neck diameter, the calcar screw-cortex distance/neck diameter (Buyukdogan index), and sub-capital area/basocervical area (Dogan index) were evaluated. Patients developing nonunion were studied to establish potential cut-off values based on radiological parameters.
Of the patients, 61 were classified as Non-Fail (Group 1) and 26 as Fail (Group 2). Both groups exhibited similar distributions in terms of gender, fracture side, Pauwels classification, and follow-up times ( > 0.05). However, Group 2 had a higher mean age than Group 1 ( = 0.006). There was a significant difference between the two groups in terms of Garden classification ( = 0.0003). Furthermore, postoperative calcar displacement, varus alignment, m-TAD, TCD, upper-lower screw-cortex distance/neck diameter ratio, Buyukdogan index, and Dogan index showed significant differences between the groups ( < 0.05). Conversely, medial calcar fragmentation did not differ significantly between the groups ( > 0.05).
The Dogan index (≤ 0.5) can serve as an independent preoperative predictor of treatment failure, aiding in the selection of more effective surgical interventions than TCS. Varus alignment (> 10 degrees), the upper-lower screw-cortex distance to the neck diameter (> 0.45) and Buyukdogan index (> 0.2) are influenced by the surgical technique of TCS application and should be considered to decrease the success of TCS.
对于采用三枚空心钉(TCS)治疗的年轻股骨颈骨折,治疗失败仍是一项挑战。本研究旨在确定能够预测治疗失败的新的放射学参数,并提出手术技术以提高TCS治疗的成功率或辅助选择替代方法。
我们对2014年2月至2022年6月间接受股骨颈骨折手术且符合纳入标准的87例患者进行了回顾性分析。骨折愈合的患者被归类为非失败组(第1组),而发生骨不连的患者被归类为失败组(第2组)。评估了各种人口统计学和临床因素,包括年龄、性别、骨折侧以及骨折分类(Garden和Pauwels)。对内侧皮质碎裂、股骨距区域术后骨折移位、颈干角(CDA)差异(内翻/外翻对线)等放射学参数以及几个新定义的参数(改良尖顶距(m-TAD)、尖皮质距(TCD)、上下螺钉-皮质距/颈直径、股骨距螺钉-皮质距/颈直径(Buyukdogan指数)以及股骨头下面积/基底部颈面积(Dogan指数)进行了评估。对发生骨不连的患者进行研究,以根据放射学参数确定潜在的临界值。
患者中,61例被归类为非失败组(第1组),26例为失败组(第2组)。两组在性别、骨折侧、Pauwels分类和随访时间方面分布相似(P>0.05)。然而,第2组的平均年龄高于第1组(P=0.006)。两组在Garden分类方面存在显著差异(P=0.0003)。此外,术后股骨距移位、内翻对线、m-TAD、TCD、上下螺钉-皮质距/颈直径比值、Buyukdogan指数和Dogan指数在两组之间存在显著差异(P<0.05)。相反,两组之间内侧股骨距碎裂无显著差异(P>0.05)。
Dogan指数(≤0.5)可作为治疗失败的独立术前预测指标,有助于选择比TCS更有效的手术干预措施。内翻对线(>10度)、上下螺钉-皮质距与颈直径之比(>0.45)以及Buyukdogan指数(>0.2)受TCS应用手术技术的影响,应予以考虑以降低TCS治疗的成功率。