Ali Naba, Zhou Jun, Eaton Bree R, Switchenko Jeffrey M, Cao Yichun, Stokes William A, Patel Pretesh R, Langen Katja M, Slopsema Roelf, Bradley Jeffrey D, McDonald Mark W
Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
J Radiosurg SBRT. 2024;9(2):121-128.
To review our initial experience with proton-based SBRT to evaluate the planning outcomes and initial patient tolerance of treatment.
From Sep. 2019 to Dec. 2020, 52 patients were treated with proton SBRT to 62 lesions. Fractionation varied by indication and site with a median of 5 fractions and median fractional dose of 8 Gy. Planning outcomes, including plan heterogeneity, conformity, and PTV volume receiving 100% of the prescription dose (PTV V100%) were evaluated. Acute toxicities were prospectively recorded, and patient reported outcomes were assessed prior to and at completion of treatment using the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) and EQ-5D5L visual analogue score (VAS).
All treated patients completed their course of proton-based SBRT. The mean conformity index was 1.05 (range 0.51-1.48). R50% values were comparable to ideal photon parameters. PTV V100% was 89.9% on average (40.44% - 99.76%). 5 patients (10%) required plan modification due to setup or tumor changes. No patients developed a new grade 3 or greater toxicity during treatment. Comparing pretreatment to end of treatment timepoints, there was a significant improvement in the mean VAS (65 to 75, p = 0.014), with no significant change in the mean MDASI symptom (1.7, 1.8; p = 0.79) or interference (2.3, 2.4; p = 0.452) scores.
Proton-based SBRT can achieve dosimetric goals required by major clinical photon trials. It was well-tolerated with no decrement in patient reported outcomes and a mean 10-point improvement in VAS at the conclusion of SBRT. Further follow-up is necessary for tumor control and late effects analysis.
回顾我们基于质子的立体定向体部放疗(SBRT)的初步经验,以评估治疗的计划结果和患者初始耐受性。
2019年9月至2020年12月,52例患者接受了质子SBRT治疗62个病灶。分割方式因适应证和部位而异,中位分割次数为5次,中位分次剂量为8 Gy。评估计划结果,包括计划异质性、适形性以及接受100%处方剂量的计划靶体积(PTV V100%)。前瞻性记录急性毒性反应,并在治疗前和治疗结束时使用MD安德森症状量表(MDASI)和EQ-5D5L视觉模拟评分(VAS)评估患者报告的结局。
所有接受治疗的患者均完成了基于质子的SBRT疗程。平均适形指数为1.05(范围0.51 - 1.48)。R50%值与理想的光子参数相当。PTV V100%平均为89.9%(40.44% - 99.76%)。5例患者(10%)因摆位或肿瘤变化需要修改计划。治疗期间无患者出现新发生的3级或更高级别毒性反应。比较治疗前和治疗结束时的时间点,平均VAS有显著改善(从65到75,p = 0.014), 而平均MDASI症状评分(1.7,1.8;p = 0.79)或干扰评分(2.3,2.4;p = 0.452)无显著变化。
基于质子的SBRT可实现主要临床光子试验所需的剂量学目标。其耐受性良好, 患者报告的结局无下降,且在SBRT结束时VAS平均提高了10分。需要进一步随访以进行肿瘤控制和晚期效应分析。