Suppr超能文献

质子立体定向体部放射治疗的初步经验及患者耐受性

Initial experience and patient tolerance of proton stereotactic body radiotherapy.

作者信息

Ali Naba, Zhou Jun, Eaton Bree R, Switchenko Jeffrey M, Cao Yichun, Stokes William A, Patel Pretesh R, Langen Katja M, Slopsema Roelf, Bradley Jeffrey D, McDonald Mark W

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.

出版信息

J Radiosurg SBRT. 2024;9(2):121-128.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To review our initial experience with proton-based SBRT to evaluate the planning outcomes and initial patient tolerance of treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From Sep. 2019 to Dec. 2020, 52 patients were treated with proton SBRT to 62 lesions. Fractionation varied by indication and site with a median of 5 fractions and median fractional dose of 8 Gy. Planning outcomes, including plan heterogeneity, conformity, and PTV volume receiving 100% of the prescription dose (PTV V100%) were evaluated. Acute toxicities were prospectively recorded, and patient reported outcomes were assessed prior to and at completion of treatment using the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) and EQ-5D5L visual analogue score (VAS).

RESULTS

All treated patients completed their course of proton-based SBRT. The mean conformity index was 1.05 (range 0.51-1.48). R50% values were comparable to ideal photon parameters. PTV V100% was 89.9% on average (40.44% - 99.76%). 5 patients (10%) required plan modification due to setup or tumor changes. No patients developed a new grade 3 or greater toxicity during treatment. Comparing pretreatment to end of treatment timepoints, there was a significant improvement in the mean VAS (65 to 75, p = 0.014), with no significant change in the mean MDASI symptom (1.7, 1.8; p = 0.79) or interference (2.3, 2.4; p = 0.452) scores.

CONCLUSION

Proton-based SBRT can achieve dosimetric goals required by major clinical photon trials. It was well-tolerated with no decrement in patient reported outcomes and a mean 10-point improvement in VAS at the conclusion of SBRT. Further follow-up is necessary for tumor control and late effects analysis.

摘要

目的

回顾我们基于质子的立体定向体部放疗(SBRT)的初步经验,以评估治疗的计划结果和患者初始耐受性。

患者与方法

2019年9月至2020年12月,52例患者接受了质子SBRT治疗62个病灶。分割方式因适应证和部位而异,中位分割次数为5次,中位分次剂量为8 Gy。评估计划结果,包括计划异质性、适形性以及接受100%处方剂量的计划靶体积(PTV V100%)。前瞻性记录急性毒性反应,并在治疗前和治疗结束时使用MD安德森症状量表(MDASI)和EQ-5D5L视觉模拟评分(VAS)评估患者报告的结局。

结果

所有接受治疗的患者均完成了基于质子的SBRT疗程。平均适形指数为1.05(范围0.51 - 1.48)。R50%值与理想的光子参数相当。PTV V100%平均为89.9%(40.44% - 99.76%)。5例患者(10%)因摆位或肿瘤变化需要修改计划。治疗期间无患者出现新发生的3级或更高级别毒性反应。比较治疗前和治疗结束时的时间点,平均VAS有显著改善(从65到75,p = 0.014), 而平均MDASI症状评分(1.7,1.8;p = 0.79)或干扰评分(2.3,2.4;p = 0.452)无显著变化。

结论

基于质子的SBRT可实现主要临床光子试验所需的剂量学目标。其耐受性良好, 患者报告的结局无下降,且在SBRT结束时VAS平均提高了10分。需要进一步随访以进行肿瘤控制和晚期效应分析。

相似文献

3
Comparison of Proton Versus Photon SBRT for Treatment of Spinal Metastases Using Variable RBE Models.
Int J Part Ther. 2025 Mar 5;16:100743. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpt.2025.100743. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
Improvement of conformal arc plans by using deformable margin delineation method for stereotactic lung radiotherapy.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2018 Jan;19(1):184-193. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12237. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
8
Assessment of HDR brachytherapy-replicating prostate radiotherapy planning for tomotherapy, cyberknife and VMAT.
Med Dosim. 2022;47(1):61-69. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2021.08.003. Epub 2021 Sep 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Proton-to-photon comparative treatment planning guidelines for the Australian context.
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2023 Apr;67(3):320-328. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.13510. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
2
Dosimetric Comparison of Various Spot Placement Techniques in Proton Pencil Beam Scanning.
Int J Part Ther. 2022 Jan 31;9(1):54-63. doi: 10.14338/IJPT-21-00022.1. eCollection 2022 Summer.
4
Small spot size versus large spot size: Effect on plan quality for lung cancer in pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2022 Feb;23(2):e13512. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13512. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
8
Proton vs Hyperarc™ radiosurgery: A planning comparison.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2020 Dec;21(12):96-108. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13075. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
9
SABR for metastasis-directed therapy - what we've learned and what's to come.
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2020 Oct;17(10):593-594. doi: 10.1038/s41571-020-0416-9.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验