van den End Arne, Beekman Aartjan T F, Dekker Jack, Aarts Inga, Snoek Aishah, Blankers Matthijs, Vriend Chris, van den Heuvel Odile A, Thomaes Kathleen
Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sinai Centrum, Amstelveen, The Netherlands.
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2024;15(1):2382652. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2024.2382652. Epub 2024 Aug 1.
Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is associated with high rates of cluster C personality disorders (PD), which may negatively affect PTSD treatment. It is unknown whether concurrent treatment for PTSD and comorbid PD leads to superior treatment effects, compared to standard trauma-focused treatment. The objective was to test the efficacy of adding personality disorder treatment (group schema therapy; GST) to individual trauma-focused treatment (imagery rescripting; ImRs). A two-arm randomized clinical trial (1:1 allocation ratio) was conducted between 2018 and 2023 at two sites of a mental health institution in the Netherlands. Raters were blind to treatment allocation. Adult outpatients with PTSD and comorbid cluster C personality disorders were randomized to receive either ImRs (12-18 sessions) or ImRs + GST (12-18 ImRs + 52-58 GST). The main outcome was PTSD severity one year after start of treatment measured with the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5. Of 130 patients (mean [SD] age = 40.6 [11.2], 110 [85%] females), 66 were assigned to ImRs and 64 to ImRs + GST. At 12 months, there were large decreases in PTSD severity (= 2.42, 95%CI = 1.97-2.87; = 2.44, 95%CI = 1.99-2.90), but there was no significant difference between conditions (= 0.02, 95%CI = -0.33-0.36, = .944). Reductions in personality disorder symptoms and all other secondary outcomes were observed in both conditions. There were no significant differences between conditions on any of the secondary outcomes at 12 months. The more intensive concurrent trauma-focused and personality disorder treatment (ImRs + GST) was not superior to trauma-focused treatment alone (ImRs) for patients with PTSD and comorbid CPD. This suggests that trauma-focused treatment is the preferred primary treatment in patients presenting with both internalizing personality disorder and PTSD, reserving the stepping up to more intensive psychotherapy aimed at the personality disorder as a second line of treatment. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03833531.
创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)与C类人格障碍(PD)的高发病率相关,这可能会对PTSD的治疗产生负面影响。与标准的以创伤为重点的治疗相比,同时治疗PTSD和共病的PD是否能带来更好的治疗效果尚不清楚。目的是测试在个体以创伤为重点的治疗(意象改写;ImRs)中加入人格障碍治疗(团体图式疗法;GST)的疗效。2018年至2023年期间,在荷兰一家心理健康机构的两个地点进行了一项双臂随机临床试验(分配比例为1:1)。评估者对治疗分配情况不知情。患有PTSD和共病C类人格障碍的成年门诊患者被随机分配接受ImRs(12 - 18次治疗)或ImRs + GST(12 - 18次ImRs + 52 - 58次GST)。主要结局是治疗开始一年后用《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版临床医生管理的PTSD量表测量的PTSD严重程度。在130名患者中(平均[标准差]年龄 = 40.6 [11.2],110名[85%]为女性),66名被分配到ImRs组,64名被分配到ImRs + GST组。在12个月时,PTSD严重程度大幅下降(= 2.42,95%置信区间 = 1.97 - 2.87;= 2.44,95%置信区间 = 1.99 - 2.90),但两组之间无显著差异(= 0.02,95%置信区间 = -0.33 - 0.36,= 0.944)。两种治疗条件下人格障碍症状及所有其他次要结局均有改善。在12个月时,两种治疗条件在任何次要结局上均无显著差异。对于患有PTSD和共病CPD的患者,更强化的同时以创伤为重点和人格障碍的治疗(ImRs + GST)并不优于单独的以创伤为重点的治疗(ImRs)。这表明,对于同时患有内化性人格障碍和PTSD的患者,以创伤为重点的治疗是首选的主要治疗方法,将升级到针对人格障碍的更强化心理治疗作为二线治疗。ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT03833531。