• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Health care resource utilization and direct costs incurred over 24 months after initiating galcanezumab or standard-of-care preventive migraine treatments in the United States.在美国开始使用加卡奈珠单抗或标准护理预防性偏头痛治疗后24个月内的医疗保健资源利用情况及直接成本。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2024 Aug;30(8):792-804. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.8.792.
2
Health care resource utilization and costs associated with treatment among patients initiating calcitonin gene-related peptide inhibitors vs other preventive migraine treatments in the United States.在美国,与降钙素基因相关肽抑制剂与其他预防性偏头痛治疗相比,起始使用降钙素基因相关肽抑制剂的患者的医疗资源利用和治疗相关成本。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2022 Aug;28(8):818-829. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2022.28.8.818.
3
Treatment patterns of galcanezumab versus standard of care preventive migraine medications over 24 months: a US retrospective claims study.加拉替奈珠单抗与预防偏头痛标准治疗药物在 24 个月内的治疗模式:一项美国回顾性索赔研究。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2024 Apr;40(4):635-646. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2024.2316864. Epub 2024 Feb 22.
4
Direct and Indirect Healthcare Resource Utilization and Costs Among Migraine Patients in the United States.美国偏头痛患者的直接和间接医疗资源利用与成本。
Headache. 2018 May;58(5):700-714. doi: 10.1111/head.13275. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
5
Direct cost and healthcare resource utilization of patients with migraine before treatment initiation with calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies by the number of prior preventive migraine medication classes.根据既往预防偏头痛药物种类数量,比较降钙素基因相关肽单克隆抗体治疗起始前偏头痛患者的直接成本和医疗资源利用情况。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2022 May;38(5):653-660. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2021.2003127. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
6
Health Care Resource Utilization and Costs Among Newly Diagnosed and Oral Anticoagulant-Naive Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients Treated with Dabigatran or Warfarin in the United States.美国新诊断且未使用口服抗凝剂的非瓣膜性心房颤动患者接受达比加群或华法林治疗的医疗资源利用和成本
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Jan;24(1):73-82. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.1.73.
7
Effectiveness of erenumab and onabotulinumtoxinA on acute medication usage and health care resource utilization as migraine prevention in the United States.依那西普单抗和肉毒杆菌毒素 A 在美国预防偏头痛的急性药物使用和卫生保健资源利用的有效性。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Sep;27(9):1157-1170. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.21060. Epub 2021 May 17.
8
Comparison of COPD health care utilization and associated costs across patients treated with LAMA+LABA fixed-dose therapies.比较 LAMA+LABA 固定剂量疗法治疗的 COPD 患者的医疗保健利用情况和相关成本。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Jul;27(7):810-824. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.20514. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
9
Cycling Through Migraine Preventive Treatments: Implications for All-Cause Total Direct Costs and Disease-Specific Costs.偏头痛预防治疗的循环选择:全因直接总成本和疾病特异性成本的影响。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019 Jan;25(1):46-59. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.18058. Epub 2018 Jul 25.
10
Annual indirect costs savings in patients with episodic or chronic migraine: a post-hoc analysis of phase 3 galcanezumab clinical trials in the United States.美国戈卡纳珠单抗 3 期临床试验的事后分析:发作性或慢性偏头痛患者的年度间接成本节约。
J Med Econ. 2023 Jan-Dec;26(1):149-157. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2023.2165365.

引用本文的文献

1
Patients' Experiences During the Long Journey Before Initiating Migraine Prevention with a Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide (CGRP) Monoclonal Antibody (mAb).患者在开始使用降钙素基因相关肽(CGRP)单克隆抗体(mAb)预防偏头痛的漫长过程中的经历。
Pain Ther. 2024 Dec;13(6):1589-1615. doi: 10.1007/s40122-024-00652-z. Epub 2024 Sep 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Calcitonin gene-related peptide-targeting therapies are a first-line option for the prevention of migraine: An American Headache Society position statement update.降钙素基因相关肽靶向治疗是预防偏头痛的一线选择:美国头痛学会立场声明更新。
Headache. 2024 Apr;64(4):333-341. doi: 10.1111/head.14692. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
2
Real-world persistence and costs among patients with chronic migraine treated with onabotulinumtoxinA or calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies.慢性偏头痛患者接受肉毒毒素 A 或降钙素基因相关肽单克隆抗体治疗的真实世界持久性和成本。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2023 Oct;29(10):1119-1128. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2023.29.10.1119.
3
Eptinezumab improved patient-reported outcomes in patients with migraine and medication-overuse headache: Subgroup analysis of the randomized PROMISE-2 trial.依替唑仑单抗改善偏头痛和药物过度使用性头痛患者的患者报告结局:随机 PROMISE-2 试验的亚组分析。
Headache. 2023 Feb;63(2):264-274. doi: 10.1111/head.14434. Epub 2023 Jan 12.
4
Health care resource utilization and costs associated with treatment among patients initiating calcitonin gene-related peptide inhibitors vs other preventive migraine treatments in the United States.在美国,与降钙素基因相关肽抑制剂与其他预防性偏头痛治疗相比,起始使用降钙素基因相关肽抑制剂的患者的医疗资源利用和治疗相关成本。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2022 Aug;28(8):818-829. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2022.28.8.818.
5
Treatment Patterns for Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Monoclonal Antibodies Including Galcanezumab versus Conventional Preventive Treatments for Migraine: A Retrospective US Claims Study.降钙素基因相关肽单克隆抗体(包括加卡尼单抗)与偏头痛传统预防性治疗的治疗模式:一项美国回顾性索赔研究
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2022 Mar 29;16:821-839. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S346660. eCollection 2022.
6
Headache and immunological/autoimmune disorders: a comprehensive review of available epidemiological evidence with insights on potential underlying mechanisms.头痛与免疫/自身免疫性疾病:现有流行病学证据的全面综述,探讨潜在的潜在机制。
J Neuroinflammation. 2021 Nov 8;18(1):259. doi: 10.1186/s12974-021-02229-5.
7
CGRP monoclonal antibodies in migraine: an efficacy and tolerability comparison with standard prophylactic drugs.偏头痛治疗中降钙素基因相关肽单克隆抗体:与标准预防性药物的疗效和耐受性比较
J Headache Pain. 2021 Oct 25;22(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s10194-021-01335-2.
8
The American Headache Society Consensus Statement: Update on integrating new migraine treatments into clinical practice.美国头痛学会共识声明:更新将新的偏头痛治疗方法整合到临床实践中的建议。
Headache. 2021 Jul;61(7):1021-1039. doi: 10.1111/head.14153. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
9
Global, regional, and national burden of migraine in 204 countries and territories, 1990 to 2019.全球、地区和国家 204 个国家和地区 1990 年至 2019 年偏头痛负担
Pain. 2022 Feb 1;163(2):e293-e309. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002275.
10
Impact of erenumab on acute medication usage and health care resource utilization among migraine patients: a US claims database study.依瑞奈尤单抗对偏头痛患者急性药物使用和医疗资源利用的影响:一项美国索赔数据库研究。
J Headache Pain. 2021 Apr 19;22(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s10194-021-01238-2.

在美国开始使用加卡奈珠单抗或标准护理预防性偏头痛治疗后24个月内的医疗保健资源利用情况及直接成本。

Health care resource utilization and direct costs incurred over 24 months after initiating galcanezumab or standard-of-care preventive migraine treatments in the United States.

作者信息

Varnado Oralee J, Vu Michelle, Buysman Erin, Kim Gilwan, Allenback Gayle, Hoyt Margaret, Trenz Helen, Cao Feng, Viktrup Lars

机构信息

Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN.

Optum Life Sciences, Eden Prairie, MN.

出版信息

J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2024 Aug;30(8):792-804. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.8.792.

DOI:10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.8.792
PMID:39088336
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11293767/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Health care resource utilization (HCRU) and direct costs incurred over 12 months following initiation of galcanezumab (GMB) or standard-of-care (SOC) preventive migraine treatments have been evaluated. However, a gap in knowledge exists in understanding longer-term HCRU and direct costs.

OBJECTIVE

To compare all-cause and migraine-related HCRU and direct costs in patients with migraine initiating GMB or SOC preventive migraine treatments over a 24-month follow-up.

METHODS

This retrospective study used Optum deidentified Market Clarity Data. The study included adults diagnosed with migraine, with at least 1 claim for GMB or SOC preventive migraine therapy (September 2018 to March 2020), with continuous enrollment for 12 months before and 24 months after (follow-up) the index date (date of first GMB or SOC claim). Propensity score (PS) matching (1:1) was used to balance cohorts. All-cause and migraine-related HCRU and direct costs for GMB vs SOC cohorts were reported as mean (SD) per patient per year (PPPY) over a 24-month follow-up and compared using a Z-test. Costs were inflated to 2022 US$.

RESULTS

After PS matching, 2,307 patient pairs (mean age: 44.4 years; female sex: 87.3%) were identified. Compared with the SOC cohort, the GMB cohort had lower mean (SD) PPPY all-cause office visits (17.9 [17.7] vs 19.1 [18.7]; = 0.023) and migraine-related office visits (2.6 [3.3] vs 3.0 [4.7]; = 0.002) at follow-up. No significant differences were observed between cohorts in other all-cause and migraine-related events assessed including outpatient visits, emergency department (ED) visits, inpatient stays, and other medical visits. The mean (SD) costs PPPY were lower in the GMB cohort compared with the SOC cohort for all-cause office visits ($4,321 [7,518] vs $5,033 [7,211]; < 0.001) at follow-up. However, the GMB cohort had higher mean (SD) PPPY all-cause total costs ($24,704 [30,705] vs $21,902 [28,213]; = 0.001) and pharmacy costs ($9,507 [12,659] vs $5,623 [12,605]; < 0.001) compared with the SOC cohort. Mean (SD) costs PPPY were lower in the GMB cohort for migraine-related office visits ($806 [1,690] vs $1,353 [2,805]; < 0.001) compared with the SOC cohort. However, the GMB cohort had higher mean (SD) PPPY migraine-related total costs ($8,248 [11,486] vs $5,047 [9,749]; < 0.001) and migraine-related pharmacy costs ($5,394 [3,986] vs $1,761 [4,133]; < 0.001) compared with the SOC cohort. There were no significant differences between cohorts in all-cause and migraine-related costs for outpatient visits, ED visits, inpatient stays, and other medical visits.

CONCLUSIONS

Although total costs were greater for GMB vs SOC following initiation, changes in a few categories of all-cause and migraine-related HCRU and direct costs were lower for GMB over a 24-month follow-up. Additional analysis evaluating indirect health care costs may offer insights into further cost savings incurred with preventive migraine treatment.

摘要

背景

已对加卡尼单抗(GMB)或标准护理(SOC)预防性偏头痛治疗开始后12个月内的医疗保健资源利用(HCRU)和直接成本进行了评估。然而,在理解长期HCRU和直接成本方面存在知识空白。

目的

比较在24个月随访期内开始使用GMB或SOC预防性偏头痛治疗的偏头痛患者的全因和偏头痛相关HCRU及直接成本。

方法

这项回顾性研究使用了Optum去识别化的市场清晰度数据。该研究纳入了被诊断为偏头痛的成年人,至少有1次GMB或SOC预防性偏头痛治疗的索赔记录(2018年9月至2020年3月),在索引日期(首次GMB或SOC索赔日期)之前连续入组12个月,之后连续入组24个月(随访期)。采用倾向评分(PS)匹配(1:1)来平衡队列。GMB组与SOC组的全因和偏头痛相关HCRU及直接成本以每位患者每年(PPPY)的均值(标准差)报告,随访期为24个月,并使用Z检验进行比较。成本 inflated至2022年美元。

结果

PS匹配后,识别出2307对患者(平均年龄:44.4岁;女性:87.3%)。与SOC组相比,GMB组在随访时全因门诊就诊的PPPY均值(标准差)较低(17.9 [17.7] 对19.1 [18.7];P = 0.023),偏头痛相关门诊就诊的PPPY均值(标准差)也较低(2.6 [3.3] 对3.0 [4.7];P = 0.002)。在评估的其他全因和偏头痛相关事件(包括门诊就诊、急诊科就诊、住院和其他医疗就诊)中,两组之间未观察到显著差异。随访时,GMB组全因门诊就诊的PPPY均值(标准差)成本低于SOC组(4321美元 [7518美元] 对5033美元 [7211美元];P < 0.001)。然而,与SOC组相比,GMB组全因总成本的PPPY均值(标准差)较高(24704美元 [30705美元] 对21902美元 [28213美元];P = 0.001),药房成本也较高(9507美元 [12659美元] 对5623美元 [12605美元];P < 0.001)。与SOC组相比,GMB组偏头痛相关门诊就诊的PPPY均值(标准差)成本较低(806美元 [1690美元] 对1353美元 [2805美元];P < 0.001)。然而,与SOC组相比,GMB组偏头痛相关总成本的PPPY均值(标准差)较高(8248美元 [11486美元] 对5047美元 [9749美元];P < 0.001),偏头痛相关药房成本也较高(5394美元 [3986美元] 对1761美元 [4133美元];P < 0.001)。在门诊就诊、急诊科就诊、住院和其他医疗就诊的全因和偏头痛相关成本方面,两组之间没有显著差异。

结论

尽管开始治疗后GMB的总成本高于SOC,但在24个月的随访中,GMB在全因和偏头痛相关HCRU及直接成本的几个类别上的变化较小。评估间接医疗成本的进一步分析可能有助于深入了解预防性偏头痛治疗带来的进一步成本节约。