Hamel Raphael, Waltzing Baptiste Maxime, Massey Tom, Blenkinsop James, McConnell Leah, Osborne Kieran, Sesay Karamo, Stoneman Finn, Carter Adam, Maaroufi Hajar, Jenkinson Ned
School of Sports, Exercise, and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Institute of Neurosciences, UC Louvain, Bruxelles, Belgium.
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 1;19(8):e0306560. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306560. eCollection 2024.
Repeated sub-concussive head impacts are a growing brain health concern, but their possible biomarkers remain elusive. One impediment is the lack of a randomised controlled human experimental model to study their effects on the human brain.
This work had two objectives. The first one was to provide a randomised controlled human experimental model to study the acute effects of head impacts on brain functions. To achieve this, this work's second objective was to investigate if head impacts from heading footballs acutely alter brain excitability by increasing corticospinal inhibition as compared to a control group.
In practised and unpractised young healthy adults, transcranial magnetic stimulation was used to assess corticospinal silent period (CSP) duration and corticospinal excitability (CSE) before and immediately after performing headings by returning 20 hand-thrown balls directed to the head (Headings; n = 30) or the dominant foot (Control; n = 30). Moreover, the Rivermead Post-Concussion Questionnaire (RPQ) was used to assess the symptoms of head impacts. Head acceleration was also assessed in subgroups of participants.
The intervention lengthened CSP duration in both the Headings (6.4 ± 7.5%) and Control groups (4.6 ± 2.6%), with no difference in lengthening between the two groups. Moreover, CSE was not altered by the intervention and did not differ between groups. However, performing headings increased headaches and dizziness symptoms and resulted in greater head acceleration upon each football throw (12.5 ± 1.9g) as compared to the control intervention (5.5 ± 1.3g).
The results suggest that head impacts from football headings do not acutely alter brain excitability as compared to a control intervention. However, the results also suggest that the present protocol can be used as an experimental model to investigate the acute effects of head impacts on the human brain.
反复的亚脑震荡性头部撞击对大脑健康的影响日益受到关注,但其可能的生物标志物仍不明确。一个障碍是缺乏用于研究其对人类大脑影响的随机对照人体实验模型。
本研究有两个目标。第一个目标是提供一个随机对照人体实验模型,以研究头部撞击对脑功能的急性影响。为实现这一目标,本研究的第二个目标是调查与对照组相比,头球撞击是否会通过增加皮质脊髓抑制来急性改变脑兴奋性。
在有经验和无经验的年轻健康成年人中,通过将20个手抛球投向头部(头球组;n = 30)或优势脚(对照组;n = 30)来进行头球动作,在进行头球动作之前和之后立即使用经颅磁刺激来评估皮质脊髓静息期(CSP)持续时间和皮质脊髓兴奋性(CSE)。此外,使用里弗米德脑震荡后问卷(RPQ)来评估头部撞击的症状。还在部分参与者亚组中评估了头部加速度。
干预使头球组(6.4 ± 7.5%)和对照组(4.6 ± 2.6%)的CSP持续时间均延长,两组延长情况无差异。此外,干预未改变CSE,两组之间也无差异。然而,与对照干预相比,进行头球动作会增加头痛和头晕症状,并且每次投球时头部加速度更大(12.5 ± 1.9g),而对照干预时为(5.5 ± 1.3g)。
结果表明,与对照干预相比,头球撞击不会急性改变脑兴奋性。然而,结果也表明,本方案可作为一种实验模型,用于研究头部撞击对人类大脑的急性影响。