Département de kinanthropologie, Faculté des sciences de l'activité physique, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Département de pédiatrie, Faculté de médecine et des sciences de la santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2022 Nov;47(12):2101-2110. doi: 10.1038/s41386-022-01354-w. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
The ingestion of alcohol yields acute biphasic subjective effects: stimulation before sedation. Despite their predictive relevance to the development of alcohol use disorders (AUD), the neurobiological markers accounting for the biphasic effects of alcohol remain poorly understood in humans. Informed by converging lines of evidence, this study tested the hypothesis that alcohol ingestion acutely increases gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-mediated inhibition, which would positively and negatively predict the feeling of stimulation and sedation, respectively. To do so, healthy participants (n = 20) ingested a single dose of 94% ABV alcohol (males: 1.0 ml/kg; females: 0.85 ml/kg) in a randomized placebo-controlled cross-over design. The alcohol's biphasic effects were assessed with the Brief-Biphasic Alcohol Effects Scale, and non-invasive neurobiological markers were measured with transcranial magnetic stimulation, before and every 30 min (up to 120 min) after the complete ingestion of the beverage. Results showed that acute alcohol ingestion selectively increased the duration of the cortical silent period (CSP) as compared to placebo, suggesting that alcohol increases non-specific GABAergic inhibition. Importantly, CSP duration positively and negatively predicted increases in the feeling of stimulation and sedation, respectively, suggesting that stimulation emerges as GABAergic inhibition increases and that sedation emerges as GABAergic inhibition returns to baseline values. Overall, these results suggest that modulations of GABAergic inhibition are central to the acute biphasic subjective effects of alcohol, providing a potential preventive target to curb the progression of at-risk individuals to AUD.
兴奋在前,镇静在后。尽管这些双相效应与酒精使用障碍(AUD)的发展具有预测相关性,但在人类中,导致酒精双相效应的神经生物学标志物仍知之甚少。本研究基于一系列相互印证的证据,检验了以下假说:饮酒会急性增加γ-氨基丁酸(GABA)介导的抑制作用,从而分别正向和负向预测兴奋和镇静的感觉。为此,健康参与者(n=20)在随机安慰剂对照交叉设计中单次摄入 94%ABV 的酒精(男性:1.0ml/kg;女性:0.85ml/kg)。使用短暂性双相酒精效应量表评估酒精的双相效应,并在完全摄入饮料前和之后每 30 分钟(最多 120 分钟)使用经颅磁刺激测量非侵入性神经生物学标志物。结果表明,与安慰剂相比,急性酒精摄入会选择性地增加皮质静息期(CSP)的持续时间,这表明酒精会增加非特异性 GABA 能抑制。重要的是,CSP 持续时间分别正向和负向预测了兴奋感和镇静感的增加,这表明随着 GABA 能抑制的增加,兴奋感出现,而随着 GABA 能抑制恢复到基线值,镇静感出现。总体而言,这些结果表明 GABA 能抑制的调节是酒精急性双相主观效应的核心,为遏制高危个体向 AUD 发展提供了一个潜在的预防靶点。