Dunnigan Allison E, Fusco Rachel A
University of Georgia, School of Social Work, 279 Williams St, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
Child Abuse Negl. 2024 Sep;155:106950. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.106950. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
There is evidence youth in foster care may be vulnerable to commercial and sexual exploitation of children (CSEC) in the U.S. Youth in care may show vulnerabilities such as running away, identifying as sexual/gender minorities, or exhibiting complex behavioral and mental health needs. However, the nature and nuances of the relationship between CSEC and foster care placements has been largely unexamined.
This review explores the literature on trafficking among foster care youth to establish what is known about risk factors, vulnerable populations, and leverage points for prevention and intervention.
This scoping review was conducted using PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Eight databases were searched, and the screening process resulted in 16 final articles in the analysis.
Sixteen articles were screened into the current study. In reviewing the content, a few distinct themes emerged. First, the articles focused on three different populations of CSEC youth. Second, there was variability in the definitions of CSEC used by scholars. Third, there was a range of terms used to describe youth who were trafficked. Finally, there were broad differences in study methodology. This included the data sources used and the array of outcomes explored (e.g. substance use, mental health diagnoses, housing stability).
It is important for scholars to use common language and definitions when studying the sex trafficking of minors. Developing national databases and improving state and federal data sharing is needed to inform prevalence estimates and explore various pathways to youth experiencing CSEC.
有证据表明,在美国,寄养青年可能容易遭受儿童商业性剥削和性剥削(CSEC)。受照料的青年可能表现出一些脆弱性,比如离家出走、认定自己为性/性别少数群体,或者表现出复杂的行为和心理健康需求。然而,CSEC与寄养安置之间关系的本质和细微差别在很大程度上尚未得到研究。
本综述探讨了关于寄养青年人口贩运的文献,以确定已知的风险因素、弱势群体以及预防和干预的切入点。
本范围综述按照PRISMA-ScR指南进行。检索了八个数据库,筛选过程最终产生了16篇用于分析的文章。
16篇文章被纳入本研究。在审查内容时,出现了几个不同的主题。首先,这些文章关注了CSEC青年的三个不同群体。其次,学者们对CSEC的定义存在差异。第三,用于描述被贩运青年的术语范围很广。最后,研究方法存在广泛差异。这包括所使用的数据来源以及所探讨的一系列结果(如药物使用、心理健康诊断、住房稳定性)。
学者们在研究未成年人性交易时使用通用语言和定义非常重要。需要建立国家数据库并改善州和联邦的数据共享,以了解患病率估计情况并探索CSEC青年的各种途径。