School of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Australia.
School of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Australia; Surgical Treatment, and Rehabilitation Services (STARS), Queensland Health, Australia.
Radiography (Lond). 2024 Aug;30(5):1342-1348. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2024.07.009. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
Pharmaceuticals are used widely in radiography practice but pose an environmental risk. This study explored Australian radiographers' environmental attitude, pharmaceutical waste disposal practices, and knowledge and concern regarding the environmental impact of these pharmaceuticals.
This study utilised an anonymous, online questionnaire developed from two validated questionnaires. Participants (n = 150) held current registration with the Medical Radiation Practice Board of Australia and were working eight or more hours per week in a medical imaging practice (public or private).
Participants did not answer all questions, hence percentages reported reflect the number of counts for each question. Most participants (71.4%; 105/147) disposed of contaminated pharmaceutical waste in clinical waste bins with 17.1% (15/146) disposing of it down drains. More hospital radiographers 13.54% (13/96) reported this disposal compared with 2.08% (1/48) of community-based radiographers (Fisher's Exact Test, p = 0.035). There was no difference in disposal of non-contaminated waste between practice settings - general waste bin (68.5%; 100/150), recycling bin (28.8%; 42/146), and clinical waste bin (41.8%; 61/146). Participants lacked knowledge of impacts on the food chain and the health of humans and wildlife. Only 34.7% (48/138) of participants expressed concern regarding the impacts of human excreted pharmaceuticals on the environment compared with 65.8% (98/149) regarding impacts from incorrect disposal. Many (18.4%; 25/136) reported having received no information on correct disposal of pharmaceutical waste.
This study highlighted participants' lack of knowledge on how pharmaceuticals enter the natural environment and the subsequent impacts on the environment and on the health of humans, and flora and fauna. They lacked knowledge of correct pharmaceutical waste disposal methods, but most agreed it was their professional responsibility to dispose of waste correctly.
Improving radiographers' pharmaceutical waste disposal practices through education and professional support will reduce environmental impacts and also provide financial co-benefits if non-contaminated waste is recycled where possible and not incinerated.
药品在放射科实践中广泛使用,但会带来环境风险。本研究探讨了澳大利亚放射技师的环境态度、药品废物处理实践以及他们对这些药品的环境影响的知识和关注。
本研究使用了一种匿名的在线问卷,该问卷是由两份经过验证的问卷开发的。参与者(n=150)持有澳大利亚医疗辐射实践委员会的当前注册,并在医疗成像实践(公共或私人)中每周工作八小时或更长时间。
参与者并非回答了所有问题,因此报告的百分比反映了每个问题的计数数。大多数参与者(71.4%;105/147)将受污染的药品废物丢弃在临床废物桶中,17.1%(15/146)将其排入下水道。更多的医院放射技师(13.54%;13/96)报告了这种处理方式,而社区放射技师(2.08%;1/48)则没有(Fisher 确切检验,p=0.035)。在处理非污染废物方面,医院和社区放射技师之间没有差异——一般垃圾桶(68.5%;100/150)、回收垃圾桶(28.8%;42/146)和临床废物桶(41.8%;61/146)。参与者对药品对食物链以及人类和野生动物健康的影响知之甚少。只有 34.7%(48/138)的参与者表示对人类排泄的药品对环境的影响表示担忧,而 65.8%(98/149)的参与者则表示对不正确处理的影响表示担忧。许多人(18.4%;25/136)报告说他们没有收到关于正确处理药品废物的信息。
本研究强调了参与者对药品如何进入自然环境以及随后对环境以及人类、植物和动物健康的影响的知识不足。他们缺乏正确处理药品废物的方法的知识,但大多数人都认为正确处理废物是他们的职业责任。
通过教育和专业支持提高放射技师的药品废物处理实践将减少环境影响,如果可能的话,对非污染废物进行回收利用而不是焚烧,还将带来经济上的好处。