Suppr超能文献

聚乙二醇化重组人粒细胞刺激因子-重组人粒细胞刺激因子联合方案动员淋巴瘤患者自体干细胞移植疗效的回顾性研究

A retrospective study on the efficacy of pegfilgrastim-filgrastim combination regimen in the mobilization for autologous stem cell transplantation in lymphoma patients.

作者信息

Wang Xingtong, Guo Wei, Li Junna, Li Jia, Zhao Yangzhi, Du Beibei, Bai Ou

机构信息

Department of Hematology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.

Department of Cardiology, The Third Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin Provincial Molecular Biology Research Center for Precision Medicine of Major Cardiovascular Disease, Changchun, China.

出版信息

Am J Med Sci. 2025 Jan;369(1):96-104. doi: 10.1016/j.amjms.2024.07.031. Epub 2024 Jul 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The high mobilization failure rate with the mobilization strategy of combining chemotherapy and filgrastim (rhG-CSF) in autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) in lymphomas is one of the unresolved issues. Whether the combination of polyethylene glycol filgrastim [pegfilgrastim (PEG-FIL), PEG-rhG-CSF] and filgrastim (FIL) improves the mobilization success rate and the timing of combination therapy has not been studied.

METHODS

107 lymphoma patients who received auto-HSCT were retrospectively enrolled and divided into groups of PEG+FIL and FIL. The group of PEG+FIL received pegfilgrastim (9 mg) on the third day of the chemotherapy, followed by filgrastim (10 μg/kg/day) based on the counts of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC). The group of FIL received filgrastim 10 μg /kg/day depending on the number of PBSCs.

RESULTS

The incidence of neutropenic fever in the group of PEG+FIL was significantly lower than in the group of FIL. The mean recovery time of leukocytes at autologous stem cell transplantation was significantly shorter in the group of PEG+FIL than in the group of FIL. Compared to the groups of FIL, the group of PEG+FIL had lower hospitalization costs. We found that the combination therapy is more recommended for patients with a bone marrow hematopoietic area of less than 30 %. Filgrastim is best administered 5-6 days after pegfilgrastim administration.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to conventional filgrastim mobilization, the combination of pegfilgrastim and filgrastim schedule has high efficacy, non-inferior safety, and superior health economic benefits during auto-HSCT.

摘要

背景

在淋巴瘤自体造血干细胞移植(auto-HSCT)中,化疗联合非格司亭(rhG-CSF)的动员策略导致较高的动员失败率,这是尚未解决的问题之一。聚乙二醇化非格司亭[培非格司亭(PEG-FIL),PEG-rhG-CSF]与非格司亭(FIL)联合使用是否能提高动员成功率以及联合治疗的时机尚未得到研究。

方法

回顾性纳入107例接受auto-HSCT的淋巴瘤患者,分为PEG+FIL组和FIL组。PEG+FIL组在化疗第3天接受培非格司亭(9 mg),随后根据外周血干细胞(PBSC)计数给予非格司亭(10 μg/kg/天)。FIL组根据PBSC数量给予非格司亭10 μg/kg/天。

结果

PEG+FIL组中性粒细胞减少性发热的发生率显著低于FIL组。PEG+FIL组自体干细胞移植时白细胞的平均恢复时间显著短于FIL组。与FIL组相比,PEG+FIL组的住院费用更低。我们发现,对于骨髓造血面积小于30%的患者,更推荐联合治疗。非格司亭最好在培非格司亭给药后5-6天使用。

结论

与传统的非格司亭动员相比,在auto-HSCT期间,培非格司亭与非格司亭联合方案具有高效、非劣效安全性和更好的卫生经济效益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验