Department of Pharmacy, Fuyang People's Hospital, Fuyang, Anhui, China.
Department of Cardio Vascular Medicine, Fuyang People's Hospital, Fuyang, Anhui, China.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 Aug 2;24(1):402. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-04078-5.
The efficacy of dapagliflozin in patients with acute heart failure remains unclear.
To investigate the impact of dapagliflozin (DAPA) on loop diuretics use and 90-day readmission in patients with acute heart failure.
In a retrospective cohort study, patients diagnosed with acute heart failure or chronic heart failure with acute exacerbation admitted to Fuyang People's Hospital from January 2021 to April 2023, this study used DAPA (at a dose of 10 mg once daily) in combination with standard treatment. The patients were divided into DAPA group and DAPA-Free group based on whether they used DAPA in acute heart failure. To minimize the influence of confounding factors and ensure comparability between groups, we used propensity score matching (PSM).
A total of 399 patients were included, with 206 patients (51.63%) in the DAPA group and 193 patients (48.37%) in the DAPA-Free group. PSM produced 160 pairs. After PSM, there were no statistically significant differences between the DAPA and DAPA-Free groups in terms of readmission of all causes (16.88% vs. 18.12%, OR 0.9141, 95% CI 0.5385-1.552, log rank P = 0.739) or readmission for heart failure (11.88% vs. 15.0%, OR 0.9077, 95% CI 0.4441-1.469, log rank P = 0.484) after 90-day follow-up. Patients in the DAPA group had a lower mean daily dose of intravenous loop diuretics compared to the DAPA-Free group (20 mg/d vs. 30.00 mg/d, P<0.001), lower total loop diuretic dose during hospitalization (106.06 ± 31.23 mg vs. 144.50 ± 45.39 mg, P = 0.038) and a decreased number of diuretic types used (11.88% vs. 23.12%, P = 0.008).
DAPA reduced the dose of intravenous loop diuretics. However, it did not improve all-cause readmission for 90 days or readmission for heart failure after discharge.
达格列净治疗急性心力衰竭的疗效尚不清楚。
探讨达格列净(DAPA)对急性心力衰竭患者利尿剂使用和 90 天再入院的影响。
本研究采用回顾性队列研究,收集 2021 年 1 月至 2023 年 4 月期间在富阳市人民医院就诊的急性心力衰竭或慢性心力衰竭急性加重的患者,使用 DAPA(剂量为 10mg,每日一次)联合标准治疗。根据患者在急性心力衰竭时是否使用 DAPA 将患者分为 DAPA 组和 DAPA 无组。为了最小化混杂因素的影响并确保组间的可比性,我们使用倾向评分匹配(PSM)。
共纳入 399 例患者,其中 DAPA 组 206 例(51.63%),DAPA 无组 193 例(48.37%)。PSM 产生了 160 对。PSM 后,DAPA 组和 DAPA 无组的全因再入院率(16.88%比 18.12%,OR 0.9141,95%CI 0.5385-1.552,对数秩检验 P=0.739)或心力衰竭再入院率(11.88%比 15.0%,OR 0.9077,95%CI 0.4441-1.469,对数秩检验 P=0.484)均无统计学差异。与 DAPA 无组相比,DAPA 组患者静脉注射袢利尿剂的平均日剂量较低(20mg/d 比 30.00mg/d,P<0.001),住院期间总袢利尿剂剂量较低(106.06±31.23mg 比 144.50±45.39mg,P=0.038),使用的利尿剂种类也较少(11.88%比 23.12%,P=0.008)。
DAPA 减少了静脉注射袢利尿剂的剂量。然而,它并没有改善 90 天的全因再入院率或出院后心力衰竭的再入院率。