Hand Program, Division of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, University Health Network, Toronto Western Hospital, Affiliated with University of Toronto, East Wing, 2nd Floor, Rm. 400, Toronto, Canada.
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Aug 1;25(1):611. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07723-4.
Delayed union and nonunion of the scaphoid is a common complication often requiring surgical reconstruction and bone grafting. Our goal was to systematically assess the healing time and clinical outcomes following arthroscopic-assisted versus open non-vascularized bone grafting of the scaphoid.
A comprehensive search of the MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), and Cochrane Central databases was completed from inception to September 2023. We included randomized trials and observational studies that reported outcomes following scaphoid delayed union/nonunion comparing arthroscopic-assisted vs. open non-vascularized bone grafting. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. One investigator assessed certainty of evidence and a senior investigator confirmed the assessment. We pooled effects using random-effects models, when possible, for all outcomes reported by more than 1 study.
Overall, 26 studies and 822 patients were included in the study. Very low certainty evidence demonstrated that arthroscopic-assisted surgery may decrease healing time compared to open surgery (weighted mean difference [WMD] -7.8 weeks; 95%CI -12.8 to -2.8). Arthroscopic bone grafting did not result in an improvement in union rate (relative risk 1.01; 95%CI 0.9 to 1.09). The pooled data in arthroscopic graft group showed mean time to union of 11.4 weeks (95%CI: 10.4 to 12.5) with union rate of 95% (95%CI 91-98%). A single comparative study reported very low certainty evidence that arthroscopy-assisted vs. open surgery may not have an effect on pain relief (MD 0 cm, 95%CI -0.4 to 0.5 on VAS 10 cm for pain) or improving function (MD -1.2, 95% CI -4.8 to 2.3 on 100 points DASH).
Our results suggest that arthroscopic-assisted non-vascularized bone grafting may be associated with improved average weeks to heal in comparison with open surgery for scaphoid delayed union/nonunion reconstruction with overall comparable union rates. There is insufficient evidence to assess the effects of arthroscopic-assisted reconstruction on union rate, time to union, and patient-reported outcomes in patients with other important nonunion characteristics such as established humpback deformity.
舟状骨延迟愈合和不愈合是一种常见的并发症,通常需要手术重建和植骨。我们的目标是系统评估关节镜辅助与开放非血管化植骨治疗舟状骨延迟愈合/不愈合的愈合时间和临床结果。
从创建到 2023 年 9 月,全面检索了 MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL(护理和联合健康文献累积索引)和 Cochrane 中央数据库。我们纳入了比较关节镜辅助与开放非血管化植骨治疗舟状骨延迟愈合/不愈合的随机试验和观察性研究,报告了结果。两名审查员独立提取数据并评估偏倚风险。一名调查员评估证据确定性,一名资深调查员确认评估。当多个研究报告了相同的结果时,我们使用随机效应模型汇总效应。
共有 26 项研究和 822 名患者纳入研究。非常低确定性证据表明,与开放手术相比,关节镜辅助手术可能缩短愈合时间(加权均数差[WMD] -7.8 周;95%CI -12.8 至 -2.8)。关节镜植骨并未提高愈合率(相对风险 1.01;95%CI 0.9 至 1.09)。关节镜植骨组的汇总数据显示,平均愈合时间为 11.4 周(95%CI:10.4 至 12.5),愈合率为 95%(95%CI 91-98%)。一项比较研究报告了非常低确定性证据,表明关节镜辅助与开放手术可能对缓解疼痛(VAS 10cm 疼痛 0cm,95%CI -0.4 至 0.5)或改善功能(100 分 DASH 中 -1.2,95%CI -4.8 至 2.3)没有影响。
我们的结果表明,与开放手术相比,关节镜辅助非血管化植骨可能与平均愈合时间缩短相关,用于舟状骨延迟愈合/不愈合的重建,总体愈合率相当。没有足够的证据来评估关节镜辅助重建对具有其他重要不愈合特征(如已建立的驼峰畸形)的患者的愈合率、愈合时间和患者报告的结果的影响。