Guynn Sierra R, Greiner Scott P, Currin John F, Todd S Michelle, Assenga Alphonce, Hungerford Laura L, Lahmers Kevin K
Department of Biomedical Sciences and Pathobiology, Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, United States.
School of Animal Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, United States.
Front Vet Sci. 2024 Jul 18;11:1432228. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1432228. eCollection 2024.
Ikeda genotype is an emerging cattle disease in the US. Since 2017, when Ikeda was discovered in beef cattle in two counties in Virginia, cattle infections have risen to include ~67% of Virginia counties and 14 states. Consistent with New Zealand studies, many infected herds in Virginia were >90% positive upon initial testing without overt evidence of infection. Central bull tests present a unique opportunity to study the effects of Ikeda infections, as bulls from multiple source herds are consolidated. The objective of this study was to determine if infection with Ikeda affected the average daily gain (ADG), adjusted yearling weight (AYW) and breeding soundness of bulls at two test stations in Virginia over a period of years.
The bulls were fed and housed similarly to compare their growth performance and breeding soundness. For Ikeda testing, DNA was extracted from whole blood for quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
The number of bulls infected with Ikeda at initial delivery to the stations increased significantly over the years studied. Multivariable linear regression models, using Angus bulls from Virginia test stations, indicated no significant effect on ADG or AYW in bulls that became test positive during the test or were positive for the duration, compared to Angus bulls that were negative for the duration. At LOC A, the odds of passing a breeding soundness exam (BSE) were not significantly different for bulls that turned positive during the test or were positive for the duration, compared to bulls that were negative for the duration of the test. At LOC B, bulls that became positive during the test were 2.4 times more likely (95% CI: 1.165-4.995, = 0.016) to pass their BSE compared to bulls that remained negative throughout the test.
We do not suppose that an obscured infection of Ikeda is protective for bulls to pass a BSE. However, this study demonstrates an obscured infection of Ikeda does not negatively affect weight gain or achievement of a satisfactory BSE rating at the central bull test stations in Virginia.
池田基因型是美国一种新出现的牛病。自2017年在弗吉尼亚州两个县的肉牛中发现池田病以来,牛感染病例已增加到包括弗吉尼亚州约67%的县和14个州。与新西兰的研究一致,弗吉尼亚州许多受感染的牛群在初次检测时阳性率超过90%,但没有明显的感染迹象。中央公牛检测提供了一个研究池田感染影响的独特机会,因为来自多个来源牛群的公牛被集中在一起。本研究的目的是确定多年来在弗吉尼亚州的两个检测站,池田感染是否影响公牛的平均日增重(ADG)、调整后的周岁体重(AYW)和繁殖健全性。
公牛的饲养和圈舍条件相似,以比较它们的生长性能和繁殖健全性。对于池田检测,从全血中提取DNA用于定量聚合酶链反应。
在研究的几年中,初次送到检测站时感染池田的公牛数量显著增加。使用来自弗吉尼亚检测站的安格斯公牛的多变量线性回归模型表明,与检测期间及整个期间呈阴性的安格斯公牛相比,检测期间呈阳性或整个期间呈阳性的公牛的ADG或AYW没有显著影响。在地点A,检测期间呈阳性或整个期间呈阳性的公牛通过繁殖健全性检查(BSE)的几率与检测期间呈阴性的公牛相比没有显著差异。在地点B,检测期间呈阳性的公牛通过BSE的可能性是整个检测期间一直呈阴性的公牛的2.4倍(95%置信区间:1.165 - 4.995,P = 0.016)。
我们不认为池田的隐匿感染对公牛通过BSE有保护作用。然而,本研究表明,池田的隐匿感染不会对弗吉尼亚州中央公牛检测站的体重增加或获得令人满意的BSE评级产生负面影响。