文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

替雷利珠单抗对比多西他赛用于中国晚期或转移性非小细胞肺癌的成本效果分析。

Cost-effectiveness analysis of the tislelizumab versus docetaxel for advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer in China.

机构信息

Clinical Pharmacy Office, Baoji Central Hospital, Baoji, Shaanxi, China.

Department of Pharmacy, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2024 Jul 18;12:1425734. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1425734. eCollection 2024.


DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1425734
PMID:39091529
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11291238/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tislelizumab is the first PD-1 inhibitor in China to demonstrate superior efficacy in second-line or third-line treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of tislelizumab compared to docetaxel from a Chinese healthcare system perspective. METHODS: A dynamic Markov model was developed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of tislelizumab in comparison to docetaxel in second or third-line treatment. The efficacy data utilized in the model were derived from the RATIONALE-303 clinical trial, while cost and utility values were obtained from the drug data service platform and published studies. The primary outcomes of the model encompassed quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). One-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were conducted to validate the robustness of the base case analysis results. RESULTS: The tislelizumab group demonstrated a cost increase of CNY 117,473 and a gain of 0.58 QALYs compared to the docetaxel group, resulting in an ICER value of CNY 202,927 per QALY gained. CONCLUSION: The administration of tislelizumab in patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC not only extends the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Moreover, this treatment demonstrates a favorable cost-effectiveness profile across the Chinese population.

摘要

背景:替雷利珠单抗是中国首个在二线或三线治疗晚期或转移性非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者中疗效优于多西他赛的 PD-1 抑制剂。本研究旨在从中国医疗体系的角度评估替雷利珠单抗相对于多西他赛的成本效益。

方法:开发了一个动态 Markov 模型,以评估替雷利珠单抗与多西他赛二线或三线治疗相比的成本效益。模型中使用的疗效数据来自 RATIONALE-303 临床试验,而成本和效用值则来自药物数据服务平台和已发表的研究。模型的主要结果包括质量调整生命年(QALYs)、成本和增量成本效益比(ICERs)。进行了单因素敏感性分析和概率敏感性分析,以验证基础分析结果的稳健性。

结果:替雷利珠单抗组的成本增加了 117,473 元人民币,与多西他赛组相比获得了 0.58 个 QALY,导致每获得一个 QALY 的 ICER 值为 202,927 元人民币。

结论:替雷利珠单抗在晚期或转移性 NSCLC 患者中的应用不仅延长了无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS),而且在整个中国人群中具有良好的成本效益比。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0dc8/11291238/acb6241707d2/fpubh-12-1425734-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0dc8/11291238/c1fc00f2fb55/fpubh-12-1425734-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0dc8/11291238/d686eda0fff2/fpubh-12-1425734-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0dc8/11291238/acb6241707d2/fpubh-12-1425734-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0dc8/11291238/c1fc00f2fb55/fpubh-12-1425734-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0dc8/11291238/d686eda0fff2/fpubh-12-1425734-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0dc8/11291238/acb6241707d2/fpubh-12-1425734-g003.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Cost-effectiveness analysis of the tislelizumab versus docetaxel for advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer in China.

Front Public Health. 2024

[2]
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness analysis of 11 treatment paths, seven first-line and three second-line treatments for Chinese patients with advanced wild-type squamous non-small cell lung cancer: A sequential model.

Front Public Health. 2023

[3]
Cost-effectiveness analysis of tislelizumab vs. camrelizumab for the treatment of second-line locally advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

BMC Health Serv Res. 2024-5-29

[4]
Nivolumab Versus Docetaxel for Previously Treated Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in China: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Clin Drug Investig. 2020-2

[5]
Cost-effectiveness analysis of tislelizumab, nivolumab and docetaxel as second- and third-line for advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer in China.

Front Pharmacol. 2022-8-25

[6]
Cost-effectiveness analysis of tislelizumab plus chemotherapy as the first-line treatment for advanced or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma in China.

PLoS One. 2024

[7]
Cost‑effectiveness analysis of tislelizumab plus chemotherapy in Chinese patients with advanced or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Sci Rep. 2024-7-31

[8]
Immune checkpoint inhibitors as the second-line treatment for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a cost-effectiveness analysis based on network meta-analysis.

BMC Cancer. 2024-5-29

[9]
Cost-effectiveness of atezolizumab versus docetaxel and nivolumab in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer as a second line in France.

J Med Econ. 2020-5

[10]
Cost-Effectiveness of Tislelizumab Versus Docetaxel for Previously Treated Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in China.

Front Pharmacol. 2022-5-9

引用本文的文献

[1]
Cost-effectiveness of trastuzumab deruxtecan as a second-line treatment for HER2-mutant advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2025-12

[2]
Cost-effectiveness analysis of tislelizumab plus chemotherapy versus standard chemotherapy in first-line treatment for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: perspectives from the United States and China.

Int J Clin Pharm. 2024-12

本文引用的文献

[1]
QALY-type preference and willingness-to-pay among end-of-life patients with cancer treatments: a pilot study using discrete choice experiment.

Qual Life Res. 2024-3

[2]
Cost-effectiveness of first-line immunotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with different PD-L1 expression levels: A comprehensive overview.

Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2024-1

[3]
Economic evaluation of sintilimab versus docetaxel as second-line treatment for patients with advanced or metastatic squamous non-small-cell lung cancer in China: a model-based cost-effectiveness analysis.

Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2024-1

[4]
Improving access to medicines and beyond: the national volume-based procurement policy in China.

BMJ Glob Health. 2023-7

[5]
NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, Version 2.2023.

J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2023-4

[6]
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness analysis of 11 treatment paths, seven first-line and three second-line treatments for Chinese patients with advanced wild-type squamous non-small cell lung cancer: A sequential model.

Front Public Health. 2023

[7]
Tislelizumab Versus Docetaxel in Patients With Previously Treated Advanced NSCLC (RATIONALE-303): A Phase 3, Open-Label, Randomized Controlled Trial.

J Thorac Oncol. 2023-1

[8]
Cost-effectiveness analysis of tislelizumab, nivolumab and docetaxel as second- and third-line for advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer in China.

Front Pharmacol. 2022-8-25

[9]
The change of drug utilization in China's public healthcare institutions under the "4 + 7" centralized drug procurement policy: Evidence from a natural experiment in China.

Front Pharmacol. 2022-8-23

[10]
Non-small cell lung cancer in China.

Cancer Commun (Lond). 2022-10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索