Cho Minkwan, Park Eunkyung, Lee Yong-Pyo, Kim Hongsik, Park Hee Sue, Kim Hee Kyung, Yang Yaewon, Kwon Jihyun, Hyeong Lee Ki, Han Hye Sook
Department of Internal Medicine, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Republic of Korea.
Department of Clinical Trials Center, Biomedical Research Institute, Cheongju, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Republic of Korea.
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2024 Jul 31;16:17588359241265209. doi: 10.1177/17588359241265209. eCollection 2024.
Esophagogastric and pancreaticobiliary cancers are associated with chronic blood loss, poor nutrition, and surgical interventions that interfere with iron absorption. Patients with these cancers often have a higher incidence of chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA) than patients with other malignancies.
To investigate the efficacy of intravenous iron or erythropoietin-stimulating agents (ESA) for CIA treatment in patients with esophagogastric or pancreaticobiliary cancer.
Retrospective, comparative chart review of patients with esophagogastric or pancreaticobiliary cancer who received ferric carboxymaltose (FCM), or darbepoetin alfa (DA), and myelosuppressive chemotherapy at Chungbuk National University Hospital between June 2018 and December 2022.
To assess the efficacy of FCM or DA over time, data on hemoglobin (Hb) levels were collected from the time of administration of FCM or DA (baseline) until 6 months post-baseline, when available.
In total, 214 patients (124 in the FCM and 90 in the DA group) were included in the analysis. The FCM group had a higher maximum Hb level and Hb changes for 3 months (mean ± standard deviation) following FCM or DA administration from baseline than the DA group (11.3 ± 1.5 10.9 ± 1.2 g/dL, = 0.02 and 2.0 ± 1.4 1.5 ± 1.1 g/dL, = 0.004, respectively). The FCM group had a higher proportion of Hb responders than the DA group (83.9% 68.9%, = 0.013). Based on multivariable analysis, only the CIA treatment group was a significant factor for Hb response (odds ratio = 2.06, 95% confidence interval = 1.05-4.06, = 0.036).
Both FCM and DA are effective, and FCM showed a higher Hb response than DA for CIA treatment in patients with esophagogastric or pancreaticobiliary cancer. Therefore, further randomized controlled trials should determine the optimal treatment for CIA in patients with these cancers undergoing myelosuppressive chemotherapy.
食管胃癌和胰胆管癌与慢性失血、营养不良以及干扰铁吸收的手术干预有关。与其他恶性肿瘤患者相比,这些癌症患者化疗所致贫血(CIA)的发生率通常更高。
探讨静脉注射铁剂或促红细胞生成素刺激剂(ESA)治疗食管胃癌或胰胆管癌患者CIA的疗效。
对2018年6月至2022年12月期间在忠北国立大学医院接受羧麦芽糖铁(FCM)或阿法达贝泊汀(DA)以及骨髓抑制化疗的食管胃癌或胰胆管癌患者进行回顾性、对比图表审查。
为评估FCM或DA随时间的疗效,收集从FCM或DA给药时(基线)至基线后6个月(如有)的血红蛋白(Hb)水平数据。
总共214例患者(FCM组124例,DA组90例)纳入分析。FCM组从基线开始给予FCM或DA后3个月的最高Hb水平和Hb变化高于DA组(分别为11.3±1.5对10.9±1.2 g/dL,P = 0.02;2.0±1.4对1.5±1.1 g/dL,P = 0.004)。FCM组Hb反应者的比例高于DA组(83.9%对68.9%,P = 0.013)。基于多变量分析,仅CIA治疗组是Hb反应的显著因素(优势比 = 2.06,95%置信区间 = 1.05 - 4.06,P = 0.036)。
FCM和DA均有效,且在食管胃癌或胰胆管癌患者的CIA治疗中,FCM的Hb反应高于DA。因此,进一步的随机对照试验应确定接受骨髓抑制化疗的这些癌症患者CIA的最佳治疗方法。