Fenton Melissa Pearman, Forthun Larry F, Grajo Nicolette Corley
Department of Human Development & Family Studies, Colorado State University, United States.
Department of Family, Youth and Community Sciences, University of Florida PO BOX 110310 3041 McCarty D Gainesville, Florida 32611.
J Child Fam Stud. 2023 Oct;32(10):3187-3199. doi: 10.1007/s10826-023-02615-y. Epub 2023 Aug 25.
Few studies have evaluated the influence of both family factors and geographic location on youth substance use. To address this gap, a person-/variable-centered approach was used to: (1) identify latent profiles of family risk and protective factors for substance use, (2) test profile membership as a predictor of lifetime and 30-day substance use, (3) test rurality, as measured by school geographic location, as a predictor, and (4) explore interaction effects between profile membership and rurality. Youth (N=9,104; 53% female) residing in a state in the southeastern U.S. completed a statewide substance abuse and risk behavior survey including questions about family risk and protective factors and substance use behaviors. Using latent profile analysis to identify subgroups of participants with similar means and variances on the family factors, four latent profiles emerged. Risk of 30-day and lifetime substance use varied across profiles, with the profile characterized by high family-level protective factors and low family-level risk factors indicating the lowest risk for substance use. Urban youth had increased odds of reporting lifetime marijuana use compared to suburban youth; however, geographic location did not appear to confer significantly increased or decreased risk across other substances. No significant interaction results were found. These results emphasize the importance of family functioning on substance use regardless of geographic location, and that evidence-based prevention programming that reduces family risk, strengthens family protection, and is accessible to all types of communities is important to reducing or delaying substance use among youth.
很少有研究评估家庭因素和地理位置对青少年物质使用的影响。为了填补这一空白,采用了一种以人/变量为中心的方法来:(1)识别物质使用的家庭风险和保护因素的潜在特征,(2)测试特征成员身份作为终生和30天物质使用的预测因素,(3)测试以学校地理位置衡量的农村性作为预测因素,以及(4)探索特征成员身份和农村性之间的交互作用。居住在美国东南部一个州的青少年(N = 9104;53%为女性)完成了一项全州范围的药物滥用和风险行为调查,包括有关家庭风险和保护因素以及物质使用行为的问题。使用潜在特征分析来识别在家庭因素上具有相似均值和方差的参与者亚组,出现了四种潜在特征。30天和终生物质使用的风险在不同特征之间有所不同,以高家庭层面保护因素和低家庭层面风险因素为特征的特征表明物质使用风险最低。与郊区青少年相比,城市青少年报告终生使用大麻的几率增加;然而,地理位置在其他物质方面似乎并未显著增加或降低风险。未发现显著的交互作用结果。这些结果强调了无论地理位置如何,家庭功能对物质使用的重要性,以及基于证据的预防方案对于降低或延迟青少年物质使用的重要性,这些方案可以降低家庭风险、加强家庭保护并且所有类型的社区都可获得。