Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon, Korea.
Clin Orthop Surg. 2024 Aug;16(4):628-635. doi: 10.4055/cios23108. Epub 2024 Jun 7.
Although the all-inside arthroscopic modified Broström operation (AMBO) and open modified Broström operation (OMBO) for chronic lateral ankle instability (CLAI) showed favorable outcomes up to 1-year short-term follow-up, concerns about the long-term stability of AMBO are still present. Therefore, we aimed to compare midterm outcomes between the 2 methods by extending the observation period.
Fifty-four patients undergoing ankle surgery between August 2013 and July 2017 were included in the AMBO (n = 37) and OMBO (n = 17) groups. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scale and a visual analog scale (VAS) were used to evaluate the clinical outcomes. Anterior drawer test and talar tilt angle were used to evaluate the radiological outcomes. The mean follow-up duration was 59.69 months.
The 2 groups both showed improved clinical and radiological results statistically. In addition, they did not differ in age, sex, or preoperative AOFAS ankle-hindfoot scale score, VAS score, anterior drawer test, or talar tilt angle. No significant difference in the final follow-up postoperative clinical scores or radiological outcomes was observed.
AMBO and OMBO as treatments for CLAI did not yield differing clinical or radiological outcomes at a mean follow-up time point of 59.69 months.
尽管全内视镜下改良 Broström 手术(AMBO)和开放式改良 Broström 手术(OMBO)治疗慢性外侧踝关节不稳定(CLAI)在 1 年的短期随访中均取得了良好的效果,但对 AMBO 长期稳定性的担忧仍然存在。因此,我们旨在通过延长观察期来比较两种方法的中期结果。
2013 年 8 月至 2017 年 7 月期间,54 例接受踝关节手术的患者被纳入 AMBO(n=37)和 OMBO(n=17)组。采用美国矫形足踝协会(AOFAS)踝关节-后足量表和视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估临床结果。采用前抽屉试验和距骨倾斜角评估影像学结果。平均随访时间为 59.69 个月。
两组在统计学上均表现出临床和影像学结果的改善。此外,两组在年龄、性别或术前 AOFAS 踝关节-后足量表评分、VAS 评分、前抽屉试验或距骨倾斜角方面均无差异。最终随访时的临床评分或影像学结果无显著差异。
在平均 59.69 个月的随访时间点,AMBO 和 OMBO 治疗 CLAI 的临床和影像学结果没有差异。