Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, LPNC, Grenoble, France.
Defitech Chair in Clinical Neuroengineering, Center for Neuroprosthetics and Brain Mind Institute, EPFL, Geneva, Switzerland.
Autism Res. 2024 Sep;17(9):1778-1795. doi: 10.1002/aur.3209. Epub 2024 Aug 2.
Face processing relies on predictive processes driven by low spatial frequencies (LSF) that convey coarse information prior to fine information conveyed by high spatial frequencies. However, autistic individuals might have atypical predictive processes, contributing to facial processing difficulties. This may be more normalized in autistic females, who often exhibit better socio-communicational abilities than males. We hypothesized that autistic females would display a more typical coarse-to-fine processing for socio-emotional stimuli compared to autistic males. To test this hypothesis, we asked adult participants (44 autistic, 51 non-autistic) to detect fearful faces among neutral faces, filtered in two orders: from coarse-to-fine (CtF) and from fine-to-coarse (FtC). Results show lower d' values and longer reaction times for fearful detection in autism compared to non-autistic (NA) individuals, regardless of the filtering order. Both groups presented shorter P100 latency after CtF compared to FtC, and larger amplitude for N170 after FtC compared to CtF. However, autistic participants presented a reduced difference in source activity between CtF and FtC in the fusiform. There was also a more spatially spread activation pattern in autistic females compared to NA females. Finally, females had faster P100 and N170 latencies, as well as larger occipital activation for FtC sequences than males, irrespective of the group. Overall, the results do not suggest impaired predictive processes from LSF in autism despite behavioral differences in fear detection. However, they do indicate reduced brain modulation by spatial frequency in autism. In addition, the findings highlight sex differences that warrant consideration in understanding autistic females.
面部处理依赖于由低空间频率 (LSF) 驱动的预测过程,这些过程在高空间频率传递的精细信息之前传递粗糙信息。然而,自闭症个体可能具有异常的预测过程,这导致了面部处理困难。在自闭症女性中,这种情况可能更为正常,她们通常比男性表现出更好的社交沟通能力。我们假设自闭症女性在处理社会情感刺激时,会表现出比自闭症男性更典型的粗到细加工。为了验证这一假设,我们要求成年参与者(44 名自闭症患者,51 名非自闭症患者)在中性面孔中检测到恐惧面孔,这些面孔经过两种顺序的过滤:从粗到细(CtF)和从细到粗(FtC)。结果显示,与非自闭症(NA)个体相比,自闭症个体在恐惧检测中表现出较低的 d' 值和更长的反应时间,无论过滤顺序如何。两组参与者在 CtF 后 P100 潜伏期比 FtC 短,在 FtC 后 N170 振幅比 CtF 大。然而,与 FtC 相比,自闭症参与者在梭状回中的源活动差异较小。此外,与 NA 女性相比,自闭症女性的激活模式更为分散。最后,女性在 FtC 序列中具有更快的 P100 和 N170 潜伏期,以及更大的枕叶激活,而男性则没有,无论组别如何。总的来说,尽管在恐惧检测方面存在行为差异,但这些结果并不能表明自闭症中存在 LSF 预测过程受损。然而,它们确实表明自闭症中大脑对空间频率的调节减少。此外,这些发现强调了性别的差异,这在理解自闭症女性时需要考虑。