Human Behavior & Genetic Institute, Associate Research Center, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea.
School of Biomedical Engineering, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea.
NeuroRehabilitation. 2024;55(1):117-125. doi: 10.3233/NRE-240081.
Healthcare professionals deliver pain education, yet their perception of pain experiences is not well understood, which can affect their interactions with patients in pain.
This study explored Korean healthcare professionals' perceptions of the usefulness of assessing pain concepts and beliefs and the importance of domains identified in the pain literature.
This descriptive cross-sectional study employed an online survey administered to nurses, physical therapists, and physicians, including the Neurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire, Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, and related optional open-ended questions.
Most participants acknowledged the importance and usefulness of assessing understanding of pain concepts but anticipated patients' difficulty comprehending items assessing biological mechanisms underlying pain. Participants questioned the items' accuracy, indicating their limited pain knowledge and the necessity of reducing literacy demands. The critical domains of pain education were learning about pain, external factors influencing pain, and pain as a form of protection.
Participants had suboptimal pain knowledge but emphasized decreasing literacy demands of pain neurophysiology items. Additionally, it is necessary to develop and implement a pain education program to improve pain-related knowledge and provide educational content for healthcare professionals encountering patients in pain.
医疗保健专业人员提供疼痛教育,但他们对疼痛体验的感知尚不清楚,这可能会影响他们与疼痛患者的互动。
本研究探讨了韩国医疗保健专业人员对评估疼痛概念和信念的有用性以及疼痛文献中确定的领域的重要性的看法。
本描述性横断面研究采用在线问卷调查了护士、物理治疗师和医生,包括疼痛神经生理学问卷、坦帕运动恐惧量表和相关的可选开放式问题。
大多数参与者承认评估对疼痛概念的理解的重要性和有用性,但预计患者难以理解评估疼痛背后生物学机制的项目。参与者对这些项目的准确性提出了质疑,表明他们的疼痛知识有限,有必要降低读写要求。疼痛教育的关键领域是了解疼痛、影响疼痛的外部因素以及疼痛作为一种保护形式。
参与者的疼痛知识不足,但强调要降低疼痛神经生理学项目的读写要求。此外,有必要开发和实施疼痛教育计划,以提高与疼痛相关的知识,并为遇到疼痛患者的医疗保健专业人员提供教育内容。