Université de Franche-Comté, INSERM, UMR 1322 LINC, Besançon, France.
Université de Franche-Comté, INSERM, UMR 1322 LINC, Plateforme Neuraxess, CIC-1431 INSERM, Besançon, France.
Attach Hum Dev. 2024 Oct;26(5):423-445. doi: 10.1080/14616734.2024.2384393. Epub 2024 Aug 2.
Despite a growing literature, experiments directly related to attachment are still needed. We explored brain processes involved in two aspects of attachment, distress and comfort. Seventy-eight healthy adult males with different attachment styles (secure, avoidant, and anxious) viewed distress, comfort, complicity-joy and neutral images (picture database BAPS-Adult) in an fMRI block design. ROIs from the modules described in the functional Neuro-Anatomical Model of Attachment (Long et al. 2020) were studied. Secure participants used more co- and self-regulation strategies and exhibited a higher activation of the reward network in distress and comfort viewing, than insecure participants. Avoidant participants showed the lower brain activations. Their approach and reward modules were the least activated in distress and comfort. Anxious participants presented both higher activations of the approach and aversion modules during complicity-joy. In addition, comfort and complicity-joy were processed differently according to attachment styles and should be differentiated among positive stimuli to disentangle attachment processes.
尽管文献数量不断增加,但仍需要进行直接与依恋相关的实验。我们探讨了与依恋的两个方面(痛苦和安慰)相关的大脑过程。78 名具有不同依恋风格(安全型、回避型和焦虑型)的健康成年男性在 fMRI 块设计中观看痛苦、安慰、共谋-愉悦和中性图像(BAPS-Adult 图像库)。研究了依恋功能神经解剖模型(Long 等人,2020)中描述的模块的 ROI。与不安全型参与者相比,安全型参与者在观看痛苦和安慰时使用了更多的共同和自我调节策略,并且奖励网络的激活程度更高。回避型参与者的大脑活动水平较低。他们的接近和奖励模块在痛苦和安慰中激活程度最低。焦虑型参与者在共谋-愉悦时表现出更高的趋近和回避模块的激活。此外,根据依恋风格,安慰和共谋-愉悦的处理方式不同,应该在积极刺激之间进行区分,以分离依恋过程。