• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比特币耗电量和碳足迹是否具有随机游走和泡沫特征?政策含义分析。

Do bitcoin electricity consumption and carbon footprint exhibit random walk and bubbles? Analysis with policy implications.

机构信息

Department of Economics & School of Business, University of Ibadan, Nigeria.

School of World Economy, National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE), Moscow, Russian Federation, Russia.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2024 Sep;367:121958. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121958. Epub 2024 Aug 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121958
PMID:39094413
Abstract

One of the main current focuses of global economies and decision-makers is the efficiency of energy utilization in cryptocurrency mining and trading, along with the reduction of associated carbon emissions. Understanding the pattern of Bitcoin's energy consumption and its bubble frequency can greatly enhance policy analysis and decision-making for energy efficiency and carbon emission reduction. This research aims to assess the validity of the random walk hypothesis for Bitcoin's electricity consumption and carbon footprint. We employed both traditional methods (ADF and KPSS) and recently proposed unit root techniques that account for structural breaks and non-linearity in the data series. Our analysis covers daily data from July 2010 to December 2021. The empirical results revealed that traditional unit root techniques did not confirm the stationarity of both bitcoin's electricity consumption and carbon footprint. However, novel structural break (SB) and linearity tests conducted enabled us to discover five SB episodes between 2012 and 2020 and non-linearity of the variables, which informed our application of the newly developed non-linear unit root tests with structural breaks. With the new methods, the results indicated stationarity after accommodating the SB and non-linearity. Furthermore, based on Phillips and Shi (2019)'s test, we identified certain bubble episodes in the bitcoin energy and carbon variables between 2013 and 2021. The major drivers of the bubbles in bitcoin energy consumption and carbon footprint are variables relating to the bitcoin and financial markets activities and risks, including the global economic and political risks. The study's conclusion based on the above findings informs several policy implications drawn for energy and environmental management including the encouragement of green investments in cryptocurrency mining and trading.

摘要

当前,全球经济和决策者的主要关注点之一是加密货币挖矿和交易中能源利用的效率以及相关碳排放的减少。了解比特币能源消耗的模式及其泡沫频率可以极大地增强政策分析和能源效率及减排决策。本研究旨在评估比特币耗电量和碳足迹的随机游走假说的有效性。我们采用了传统方法(ADF 和 KPSS)和最近提出的单位根技术,这些技术考虑了数据序列中的结构断裂和非线性。我们的分析涵盖了 2010 年 7 月至 2021 年 12 月的每日数据。实证结果表明,传统的单位根技术并未证实比特币耗电量和碳足迹的平稳性。然而,我们进行的新的结构断裂(SB)和线性检验使我们能够发现 2012 年至 2020 年期间的五个 SB 阶段以及变量的非线性,这为我们应用新开发的带有结构断裂的非线性单位根检验提供了信息。使用新方法,在适应了 SB 和非线性之后,结果表明平稳性。此外,根据 Phillips 和 Shi(2019)的检验,我们在 2013 年至 2021 年期间发现了比特币能源和碳变量中的某些泡沫阶段。比特币能源消耗和碳足迹泡沫的主要驱动因素是与比特币和金融市场活动和风险相关的变量,包括全球经济和政治风险。基于上述发现的研究结论为能源和环境管理提供了一些政策启示,包括鼓励在加密货币挖矿和交易中进行绿色投资。

相似文献

1
Do bitcoin electricity consumption and carbon footprint exhibit random walk and bubbles? Analysis with policy implications.比特币耗电量和碳足迹是否具有随机游走和泡沫特征?政策含义分析。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Sep;367:121958. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121958. Epub 2024 Aug 1.
2
Uncovering Bitcoin's electricity consumption relationships with volatility and price: Environmental Repercussions.揭示比特币的耗电量与波动性和价格之间的关系:环境影响。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Apr;356:120528. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120528. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
3
Dataset on bitcoin carbon footprint and energy consumption.关于比特币碳足迹和能源消耗的数据集。
Data Brief. 2022 May 11;42:108252. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2022.108252. eCollection 2022 Jun.
4
Life Cycle Assessment of Bitcoin Mining.比特币挖矿的生命周期评估。
Environ Sci Technol. 2019 Dec 3;53(23):13598-13606. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.9b05687. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
5
Is Bitcoin's Carbon Footprint Persistent? Multifractal Evidence and Policy Implications.比特币的碳足迹是否持续存在?多重分形证据及政策含义。
Entropy (Basel). 2022 May 5;24(5):647. doi: 10.3390/e24050647.
6
Green gold or carbon beast? Assessing the environmental implications of cryptocurrency trading on clean water management and carbon emission SDGs.绿色黄金还是碳兽?评估加密货币交易对清洁水管理和碳排放在可持续发展目标方面的环境影响。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Sep;367:122059. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122059. Epub 2024 Aug 3.
7
An extended approach to appraise electricity distribution and carbon footprint of bitcoin in a smart city.一种评估智慧城市中比特币配电和碳足迹的扩展方法。
Front Big Data. 2023 Feb 2;6:1082113. doi: 10.3389/fdata.2023.1082113. eCollection 2023.
8
Is there more to bitcoin mining than carbon emissions?比特币挖矿的影响是否不止于碳排放?
Heliyon. 2023 Apr 1;9(4):e15099. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15099. eCollection 2023 Apr.
9
BRICS carbon neutrality target: Measuring the impact of electricity production from renewable energy sources and globalization.金砖国家碳中和目标:衡量可再生能源发电和全球化的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Nov 15;298:113460. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113460. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
10
The impact of electricity consumption on CO emission, carbon footprint, water footprint and ecological footprint: The role of hydropower in an emerging economy.电力消费对 CO 排放、碳足迹、水足迹和生态足迹的影响:水电在新兴经济体中的作用。
J Environ Manage. 2018 Aug 1;219:218-230. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.101. Epub 2018 May 7.