Management Development Institute Gurgaon, Gurugram, India.
Montpellier Business School, France; School of Business, Woxsen University, India.
J Environ Manage. 2024 Apr;356:120528. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120528. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
Bitcoin, a global financial asset, surpassed one trillion USD in November 2021, but its environmental impact may cause a 2 °C temperature rise by 2050. Using causal and connectedness analysis, we uncover non-linear relationships between bitcoin's energy consumption, price, and the Crypto Volatility Index. This study uses 1458 daily observations from several databases from March 31, 2019, to March 30, 2023. The phenomenon was analyzed using the theory of production and value investing theory. While the relationship between bitcoin-based electricity consumption and crypto market volatility is bidirectional, Granger causality tests reveal that bitcoin prices Granger-cause electricity consumption, but the converse is not true. Regarding Diebold-Yilmaz connectedness, the price of bitcoin acts as a net contributor, while bitcoin-based electricity consumption and crypto market volatility act as net receivers of spillover from bitcoin price. Our findings contrast with the traditional theory of production, where cost is supposed to determine price, and we show that some bitcoin miners continue operating according to the value investing theory despite suffering financial losses. Limited discussions around bitcoin pricing and its significant expense-that is bitcoin's electricity consumption-indicate the need to explore this relationship. Policymakers, green investors, and others may find the results relevant to building an efficient, environmentally friendly framework and creating much-required innovative regulations.
比特币作为一种全球金融资产,于 2021 年 11 月突破 1 万亿美元,但它对环境的影响可能导致 2050 年气温上升 2°C。本研究使用因果和关联性分析,揭示了比特币能源消耗、价格和加密波动率指数之间的非线性关系。本研究使用了从 2019 年 3 月 31 日至 2023 年 3 月 30 日的几个数据库的 1458 个每日观察值。使用生产理论和价值投资理论分析了这一现象。虽然基于比特币的用电量与加密市场波动之间存在双向关系,但格兰杰因果检验表明,比特币价格导致用电量增加,而反之则不然。关于戴蒙德-伊尔马兹关联性,比特币价格充当净贡献者,而基于比特币的用电量和加密市场波动充当比特币价格溢出的净接受者。我们的发现与传统的生产理论相悖,传统理论认为成本决定价格,而我们表明,尽管遭受财务损失,一些比特币矿工仍继续根据价值投资理论运营。关于比特币定价及其巨大支出(即比特币的用电量)的讨论有限,表明需要探索这种关系。政策制定者、绿色投资者和其他人可能会发现这些结果与建立一个高效、环保的框架和创造急需的创新监管相关。