• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

治理因素:通过外国直接投资和金融发展缓解新兴亚洲经济体的碳排放。

The governance factor: Mitigating carbon emissions through FDI and financial development in emerging Asian economies.

机构信息

Management Development Institute, Gurgaon, India.

Jindal Global Business School, OP Jindal Global University, India.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2024 Sep;367:121740. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121740. Epub 2024 Aug 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121740
PMID:39094418
Abstract

This study investigates the influence of foreign direct investment (FDI), financial development (FD), and governance on carbon emissions in 15 emerging Asian economies (EAEs) from 2000 to 2021. It aims to assess how successful these nations have been in upholding ecological sustainability while promoting themselves as alternative manufacturing destinations to China and fostering domestic manufacturing through significant financial development. It creates a composite governance quality (GQ) measure and three subdimensions-EcoGov, InstGov, and PolGov-to assess its precise role in influencing the FDI-carbon dioxide (CO) and FD-CO nexuses. Using fully modified ordinary least squares (FMOLS) and dynamic ordinary least squares (DOLS) panel cointegration techniques, this study yielded findings revealing that FDI and FD significantly enhance carbon emissions. The overall GQ significantly moderates the FD-CO nexus but fails to moderate FDI's detrimental environmental influence. More specifically, EcoGov significantly moderates FDI's and FD's influence on carbon emissions, whereas InstGov significantly enhances their influence on emissions. In contrast, PolGov is only found to moderate FD's impact on environmental quality since the Government frequently endorses liberal environmental regulations to facilitate FDI-led growth. The findings from this study are robust and carry distinct policy ramifications.

摘要

本研究考察了外国直接投资(FDI)、金融发展(FD)和治理对 2000 年至 2021 年期间 15 个新兴亚洲经济体(EAEs)碳排放的影响。其旨在评估这些国家在维护生态可持续性的同时,通过显著的金融发展,将自身打造成中国替代制造业目的地并促进国内制造业的成功程度。本研究创建了一个综合治理质量(GQ)衡量标准和三个子维度——生态治理、制度治理和政治治理,以评估其在影响 FDI-二氧化碳(CO)和 FD-CO 关系方面的确切作用。本研究采用完全修正的普通最小二乘法(FMOLS)和动态普通最小二乘法(DOLS)面板协整技术,得出的结论表明,FDI 和 FD 显著增加了碳排放。总体 GQ 显著调节 FD-CO 关系,但未能调节 FDI 对环境的不利影响。更具体地说,生态治理显著调节了 FDI 和 FD 对碳排放的影响,而制度治理显著增强了它们对排放的影响。相比之下,仅发现政治治理调节 FD 对环境质量的影响,因为政府经常支持宽松的环境法规,以促进 FDI 主导的增长。本研究的结论是稳健的,并具有明显的政策意义。

相似文献

1
The governance factor: Mitigating carbon emissions through FDI and financial development in emerging Asian economies.治理因素:通过外国直接投资和金融发展缓解新兴亚洲经济体的碳排放。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Sep;367:121740. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121740. Epub 2024 Aug 1.
2
Does green innovation moderate between FDI and environmental sustainability? Empirical evidence from South Asia.绿色创新是否在外国直接投资和环境可持续性之间起到调节作用?来自南亚的经验证据。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 9;18(11):e0288532. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288532. eCollection 2023.
3
Role of financial development, economic growth & foreign direct investment in driving climate change: A case of emerging ASEAN.金融发展、经济增长和外国直接投资在推动气候变化方面的作用:以新兴东盟为例。
J Environ Manage. 2019 Jul 15;242:131-141. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.03.112. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
4
Foreign direct investment, foreign aid, and CO emissions in Asian economies: does governance matter?亚洲经济体的外国直接投资、外国援助和二氧化碳排放:治理是否重要?
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jan;29(5):7532-7547. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16115-3. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
5
Examining foreign direct investment and environmental pollution linkage in Asia.考察亚洲外国直接投资与环境污染的关联。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Mar;27(7):7244-7255. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-07387-x. Epub 2019 Dec 27.
6
Does FDI mitigate CO emissions intensity? Not when institutional quality is weak.FDI 是否能缓解 CO 排放强度?当制度质量较弱时并非如此。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Mar;354:120386. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120386. Epub 2024 Feb 21.
7
The impact of geopolitical risk, governance, technological innovations, energy use, and foreign direct investment on CO emissions in the BRICS region.金砖国家地区地缘政治风险、治理、技术创新、能源利用和外国直接投资对二氧化碳排放的影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jun;30(29):73714-73729. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-27466-4. Epub 2023 May 17.
8
The asymmetric associations between foreign direct investment inflows, terrorism, CO2 emissions, and economic growth: a tale of two shocks.外国直接投资流入、恐怖主义、二氧化碳排放与经济增长之间的非对称关联:两个冲击的故事。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Dec;28(48):69253-69271. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-15188-4. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
9
Exploring the optimal threshold of FDI inflows for carbon-neutral growth in Africa.探索非洲实现碳中和增长的外国直接投资流入最佳门槛。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Jan;31(2):2813-2835. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-31169-1. Epub 2023 Dec 8.
10
China carbon neutrality target: Revisiting FDI-trade-innovation nexus with carbon emissions.中国碳中和目标:重新审视碳排放视角下的 FDI-贸易-创新关系。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Sep 15;294:113043. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113043. Epub 2021 Jun 12.