Suppr超能文献

由执业护士和医师助理主导的心血管外科术后重症监护病房人员配置模式。

Nurse Practitioner and Physician Assistant-led Cardiovascular Surgery Postoperative Intensive Care Unit Staffing Model.

作者信息

Perry Ralph T, Weimer John W, Pratt Carrie, Newcome Marci D, Bagameri Gabor, Bohman J Kyle

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

出版信息

J Intensive Care Med. 2025 Feb;40(2):178-183. doi: 10.1177/08850666241268458. Epub 2024 Aug 2.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether a nurse practitioner and physician assistant (NP/PA)-led rapid staffing. Model in the cardiac surgical intensive care unit (ICU) can optimize resource utilization without compromising safety or increasing hospital length of stay (LoS).

DESIGN

Retrospective observational cohort study comparing before-and-after implementation of an NP/PA-led rapid recovery pathway.

SETTING

A large tertiary referral academic cardiac surgery ICU.

PARTICIPANTS

There were 116 patients in the prerapid recovery cohort and 153 in the postimplementation rapid recovery phase.

INTERVENTIONS

Low-risk cardiac surgery patients were selected for postoperative care by an NP/PA-led ICU staffing model.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Mean hospital LoS in the prerapid recovery cohort was 5.7 days compared to 5.2 days in the rapid recovery pathway cohort ( = .02). Thirty-day hospital readmission in the prerapid recovery pathway cohort was 7.8% compared with 2.0% in the rapid recovery cohort ( = .04). The ICU readmission rate for prerapid recovery cohort was 4.3%, while the rapid recovery percentage was 2.0% ( = .30).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, implementation of an NP/PA-led postcardiac surgical ICU team () was associated with similar ICU LoS, hospital LoS, ICU readmission rates, 30-day readmission rates, and no significant signal of increased adverse events or safety concerns.

摘要

目的

确定在心脏外科重症监护病房(ICU)由执业护士和医师助理(NP/PA)主导的快速人员配置模式是否能在不影响安全性或不增加住院时间(LoS)的情况下优化资源利用。

设计

一项回顾性观察队列研究,比较NP/PA主导的快速康复路径实施前后的情况。

地点

一家大型三级转诊学术性心脏外科ICU。

参与者

快速康复前队列中有116例患者,实施后快速康复阶段有153例患者。

干预措施

低风险心脏手术患者由NP/PA主导的ICU人员配置模式进行术后护理。

测量和主要结果

快速康复前队列的平均住院LoS为5.7天,而快速康复路径队列中为5.2天(P = 0.02)。快速康复前路径队列的30天再入院率为7.8%,而快速康复队列中为2.0%(P = 0.04)。快速康复前队列的ICU再入院率为4.3%,而快速康复队列的百分比为2.0%(P = 0.30)。

结论

总体而言,实施由NP/PA主导的心脏外科术后ICU团队与相似的ICU LoS、住院LoS、ICU再入院率、30天再入院率相关,且没有不良事件增加或安全问题的显著信号。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验