Measurements of the Interventricular Septum and Mitral Leaflet Length in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Patients Who Underwent Surgical Myectomy: A Prospective Comparative Multimodality Imaging Study.

Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) plays an important role for real-time procedural guidance during surgical smyectomy (SM) for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM). We aimed to compare (1) interventricular septum (IVS) thickness using 2- (2D) and 3-dimensional (3D) intraoperative TEE and preoperative cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and (2) mitral valve (MV) leaflet length using 2D, 3D TEE, automatic quantification of mitral valve (AMVQ) and preoperative CMR. We prospectively studied 50 patients with HOCM (age 59 ± 12 years, 44% men) who underwent SM during 2018 to 2019. The maximal basal, mid, and distal anteroseptum (AS) and inferoseptum (IS) were measured by multiplanar 3D reconstruction on TEE and by short-axis imaging on preoperative CMR and classified as mild (≤18 mm), moderate (18 to 25 mm), or severe (≥25 mm) groups based on AS and IS thickness on CMR. MV leaflet lengths were evaluated by preoperative CMR and intraprocedural 2D TEE, zoom 3D TEE, and AMVQ (EchoPAC, General Electric, Wisconsin). There was a moderate correlation between AS and IS thickness on 3D TEE and CMR (R = 0.46, p <0.01 and R = 0.41, p <0.01, respectively), with 3D TEE showing an average overestimation of 3.8 and 4.7 mm versus CMR. The 3D TEE overestimated 14 patients (56%) with mild thickness as moderate and 5 patients (22%) with moderate thickness as severe. Assuming 3D TEE as the gold standard, the closest correlation for anterior mitral leaflet length was with CMR (average overestimation by CMR of 0.5 mm [root mean square deviation (RMSE%) 17]), intermediate correlation with 2D TEE (average deviation of 0.6 mm [RMSE% 21]) and no correlation with AMVQ (average deviation of 0.7 mm [RMSE% 24]). In conclusion, 3D TEE overestimates IVS thickness versus CMR in patients with HOCM who underwent SM, with greater discrepancy in those with thinner IVS. There are significant differences in MV lengths measured using different imaging techniques.