Suppr超能文献

晚期肾细胞癌患者在接受德国肾脏肿瘤多学科工作组(IAG-N)的检查点抑制剂治疗后卡博替尼的非干预性研究的最终分析。

Final Analysis of a Noninterventional Study on Cabozantinib in Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma After Prior Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy of the German Interdisciplinary Working Group on Renal Tumors (IAG-N).

机构信息

Wetsdeutsches Tumorzentrum, Department of Medical Oncology and Department of Urology, University Hospital Essen (AöR), Essen, Germany; Westdeutsches Tumorzentrum Essen, Klinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Essen (AöR), Essen, Germany.

Klinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Münster, Germany.

出版信息

Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2024 Oct;22(5):102159. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102159. Epub 2024 Jul 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Efficacy of treatment after failure of check point inhibitors (ICI) therapy remains ill-defined in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of cabozantinib after failure of ICI-based therapies.

DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients with mRCC who concluded cabozantinib treatment directly after an ICI-based therapy were eligible. Data was collected retrospectively from participating sites in Germany.

INTERVENTIONS

Cabozantinib was administered as a standard of care.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Adverse events (AE) were reported according to CTCAE v5.0. Objective response rate according to RECIST 1.1 and Progression Free Survival (PFS) were collected from medical records. Descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meyer-plots were utilized.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

About 56 eligible patients (71.4% male) with median age of 66 years and clear cell histology in 66.1% (n = 37) were analyzed. 87.5% (n = 49) had ≥ 2 previous lines. IMDC risk was intermediate or poor in 17 patients (30.4%) and missing in 66.1%. 20 patients (35.7%) started with 60 mg. 55.4% (n = 31) required dose reductions, 26.8% (n = 15) treatment delays and 1.8% (n = 1) treatment discontinuation. Partial response was reported in 10.7% (n = 6), stable and progressive disease were reported in 19.6% (n = 11) and in 12.5% (n = 7). 32 patients were not evaluable (57.1%). Median treatment duration was 6.1 months. Treatment related AE were reported in 76.8% (n = 43) and 19.6% (n = 11) had grade 3-5. Fatigue (26.8%), diarrhea (26.8%) and hand-foot-syndrome (25.0%) were the 3 most frequent AEs of any grade and causality. SAE were reported in 21.4% (n = 12), 2 were fatal. Major limitation was the retrospective data capture in our study.

CONCLUSIONS

Cabozantinib followed directly after ICI-based therapy was safe and feasible. No new safety signals were reported. A lower starting dose was frequently utilized in this real-world cohort, which was associated with a favorable tolerability profile. Our data supports the use of cabozantinib after ICI treatment.

摘要

背景

在转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)中,检查点抑制剂(ICI)治疗失败后的治疗效果仍不明确。

目的

评估卡博替尼在 ICI 为基础的治疗失败后的安全性和有效性。

设计、地点和参与者:接受 ICI 为基础的治疗后直接接受卡博替尼治疗的 mRCC 患者符合条件。数据从德国参与的地点进行回顾性收集。

干预措施

卡博替尼作为标准治疗。

结果测量和统计分析

根据 CTCAE v5.0 报告不良事件(AE)。根据 RECIST 1.1 收集客观缓解率和无进展生存期(PFS),并从病历中收集。使用描述性统计和 Kaplan-Meier 图。

结果和局限性

分析了约 56 名符合条件的患者(71.4%为男性),中位年龄为 66 岁,透明细胞组织学占 66.1%(n = 37)。87.5%(n = 49)有≥2 条既往治疗线。17 名患者(30.4%)的 IMDC 风险为中危或高危,66.1%的患者缺失。20 名患者(35.7%)起始剂量为 60mg。55.4%(n = 31)需要剂量减少,26.8%(n = 15)需要治疗延迟,1.8%(n = 1)需要停药。报告了部分缓解 10.7%(n = 6),稳定和进展性疾病分别为 19.6%(n = 11)和 12.5%(n = 7)。32 名患者无法评估(57.1%)。中位治疗持续时间为 6.1 个月。报告了 76.8%(n = 43)的治疗相关 AE 和 19.6%(n = 11)的 3-5 级 AE。任何级别的最常见 AE 为疲劳(26.8%)、腹泻(26.8%)和手足综合征(25.0%)。报告了 21.4%(n = 12)的 SAE,其中 2 例为致命性。主要局限性是本研究中回顾性数据的采集。

结论

在 ICI 为基础的治疗后直接使用卡博替尼是安全且可行的。未报告新的安全性信号。在这个真实世界的队列中,经常使用较低的起始剂量,这与良好的耐受性相关。我们的数据支持在 ICI 治疗后使用卡博替尼。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验