U.S. Geological Survey, Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center, 2630 Fanta Reed Road, La Crosse, WI, 54603, USA.
Conagen, Inc., 15 DeAngelo Drive, Bedford, MA, 01730, USA.
Ecotoxicology. 2024 Nov;33(9):984-995. doi: 10.1007/s10646-024-02771-x. Epub 2024 Aug 3.
No current technology can specifically target grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella) for control within aquatic ecosystems. Rotenone and Carbon Dioxide-Carp are currently the only available registered pesticides for grass carp; they are nonselective and typically applied throughout the water, equally exposing target and native species. A more selective control tool or pesticide application could be used by resource managers to support mitigation efforts. Development of delivery systems that exploit carp feeding strategies could increase selectivity of pesticides and minimize effects on native fishes. A pesticide with selective delivery could be less labor intensive and used within an integrative pest management strategy. The present study examined Antimycin A toxicity in juvenile and sub-adult grass carp and rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) across two routes of exposure. Water-based toxicity studies were used to calculate the concentration to cause lethality in 50% of treated fish (LC) at 24-h, while oral gavage toxicity studies were used to calculate the dose to cause lethality in 50% of treated grass carp and rainbow trout (LD) 24- to 96-h. Although rainbow trout were more sensitive than grass carp to Antimycin A through water-based exposure, oral toxicity was similar between species, even with inherent gastrointestinal morphological differences. Successful delivery of a lethal dose of Antimycin A to grass carp was achieved through an oral route of exposure using the rapeseed bait and shows promise for registration as a control tool and eventual use in pest management plans. Although a lethal dose of Antimycin A could be incorporated into a single bait pellet, more bait was required to achieve desired mortality when fed to fish under laboratory conditions.
目前没有任何技术可以专门针对水产养殖系统中的草鱼(Ctenopharyngodon idella)进行控制。鱼藤酮和二氧化碳草鱼目前是唯一可用于草鱼的注册农药;它们没有选择性,通常会在整个水域中使用,同样会暴露目标物种和本地物种。资源管理者可以使用更具选择性的控制工具或农药应用来支持缓解工作。开发利用鲤鱼摄食策略的输送系统可以提高农药的选择性,并最大限度地减少对本地鱼类的影响。具有选择性输送的农药可以减少劳动力投入,并可在综合虫害管理策略中使用。本研究检测了抗霉素 A 对幼年和亚成年草鱼和虹鳟(Oncorhynchus mykiss)的毒性,通过两种暴露途径进行。水基毒性研究用于计算在 24 小时内使 50%处理鱼致死的浓度(LC),而口服灌胃毒性研究用于计算在 24 至 96 小时内使 50%处理草鱼和虹鳟致死的剂量(LD)。虽然虹鳟通过水基暴露对 Antimycin A 的敏感性高于草鱼,但口服毒性在两种物种之间相似,即使存在内在的胃肠道形态差异。通过使用油菜籽诱饵经口服途径成功地向草鱼输送了致死剂量的 Antimycin A,这表明它有希望注册为控制工具,并最终用于害虫管理计划。虽然可以将致死剂量的 Antimycin A 纳入单个诱饵丸中,但在实验室条件下投喂鱼类时,需要更多的诱饵才能达到所需的死亡率。