Suppr超能文献

坦桑尼亚多多马本杰明·姆卡帕区域转诊医院住院患者抗生素使用监测:一项时点患病率调查。

Surveillance of antibiotics use in inpatients at Benjamin Mkapa Zonal Referral Hospital in Dodoma, Tanzania: a point prevalence survey.

机构信息

Pharmacy and Compounding Section, Oncology, Haematology and BMT Pharmacy, The Benjamin Mkapa Hospital, Dodoma, United Republic of Tanzania

Pharmacy and Compounding Section, Oncology, Haematology and BMT Pharmacy, The Benjamin Mkapa Hospital, Dodoma, United Republic of Tanzania.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 3;14(8):e083444. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083444.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess antibiotics prescribing and use patterns for inpatients at Benjamin Mkapa Zonal Referral Hospital (BMH) using the WHO-Point Prevalence Survey (WHO-PPS).

DESIGN

A cross-sectional survey.

SETTING

The Benjamin Mkapa Zonal Referral Hospital, Dodoma, Tanzania.

PARTICIPANTS

Inpatient prescriptions, regardless of whether antibiotics were prescribed (n=286) on the day of PPS.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Our study analysed the prevalence of antibiotic use at BMH for inpatients, the type of antibiotics used, the indications for use and the proportion of oral and parenteral antibiotics. We also assessed prescription-prescribed antibiotics after a positive antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) result.

RESULTS

A survey was conducted on 286 prescriptions, which revealed that 30.07% of them included antibiotics. On average, each prescription contained at least 1.6 antibiotics. All prescriptions that included antibiotics were written in generic names, and 77.91% (67/86) of them followed the Standard Treatment Guidelines. Of the prescriptions that included antibiotics, 58.14% (50/86) had a single antibiotic, 20.93% (18/86) had parenteral antibiotics and 79.07% (68/86) had oral antibiotics. Based on AWaRe's (Access, Watch and Reserve) categorisation of antibiotics, 50% (8/16) were in the Access group, 31.25% (5/16) were in the Watch group, 12.50% (2/16) were in the Reserve group and 6.25% (1/16) were not recommended antimicrobial combinations. Out of 86 prescriptions included antibiotics, only 4.65% showed positive culture growth. However, antibiotics were still prescribed in 29.07% of prescriptions where there was no growth of bacteria, and in 66.28% of prescriptions, antibiotics were prescribed empirically without any requesting of bacteria culture and AST.

CONCLUSION

BMH has reduced inpatient Antibiotic Use by half compared with the 2019 WHO-PPS. Adherence to National Treatment Guidelines is suboptimal. Clinicians should use AST results to guide antibiotic prescribing.

摘要

目的

使用世界卫生组织(WHO)点患病率调查(PPS)评估本杰明·姆卡帕地区转诊医院(BMH)住院患者的抗生素处方和使用模式。

设计

横断面调查。

地点

坦桑尼亚多多马的本杰明·姆卡帕地区转诊医院。

参与者

在 PPS 当天,无论是否开具抗生素,都对住院患者的处方进行分析(n=286)。

结果

对 286 份处方进行了调查,结果显示,30.07%的处方包含抗生素。平均每张处方至少包含 1.6 种抗生素。所有包含抗生素的处方均以通用名开具,且 77.91%(67/86)的处方遵循标准治疗指南。在包含抗生素的处方中,58.14%(50/86)为单一抗生素,20.93%(18/86)为注射用抗生素,79.07%(68/86)为口服抗生素。根据抗生素的 AWaRe(准入、观察和储备)分类,50%(8/16)为准入类,31.25%(5/16)为观察类,12.50%(2/16)为储备类,6.25%(1/16)为不推荐的抗菌药物组合。在 86 份包含抗生素的处方中,只有 4.65%的处方显示有细菌培养阳性生长。然而,在没有细菌生长的 29.07%的处方中仍开具了抗生素,在 66.28%的处方中,没有进行细菌培养和药敏试验,而是经验性地开具了抗生素。

结论

与 2019 年 WHO-PPS 相比,BMH 住院患者的抗生素使用率降低了一半。国家治疗指南的遵行情况不理想。临床医生应使用药敏试验结果指导抗生素的开具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验