Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Department of Neurology, Center of Expertise for Parkinson and Movement Disorders, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
IQ Health, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
BMC Neurol. 2024 Aug 3;24(1):269. doi: 10.1186/s12883-024-03778-x.
An innovative, integrative care model for people with Parkinson (PRIME Parkinson) has gradually been implemented in a selected region of the Netherlands since 2021. A prospective evaluation of this model (PRIME-NL study) was initiated in parallel, spanning the year prior to implementation (baseline) and the implementation period. Following publication of the original study protocol, the COVID-19 crisis delayed implementation of the full PRIME Parkinson care model by two years and hampered the recruitment of study participants.
To describe which methodological adjustments were made to the study protocol because of these developments.
We compare various outcomes between a region where PRIME Parkinson care was implemented (innovation region) versus the rest of the Netherlands (usual care region). We use healthcare claims data of virtually all people with Parkinson in the Netherlands and annual questionnaires in a representative subsample of 984 people with Parkinson, 566 caregivers and 192 healthcare professionals. Four major methodological adjustments had to be made since publication of the original protocol. First, we extended the evaluation period by two years. Second, we incorporated annual process measures of the stage of implementation of the new care model. Third, we introduced a real-time iterative feedback loop of interim results to relevant stakeholders. Fourth, we updated the statistical analysis plan.
This manuscript provides transparency in how the design and analyses of the evaluation study had to be adapted to control for external influences in a dynamic environment, including eruption of the COVID-19 crisis. Our solutions could serve as a template for evaluating other complex healthcare interventions in a dynamic environment.
自 2021 年以来,一种针对帕金森病患者的创新综合护理模式(PRIME Parkinson)已在荷兰的一个选定地区逐步实施。与此同时,还平行启动了对该模式的前瞻性评估(PRIME-NL 研究),评估涵盖了实施前一年(基线期)和实施期间。在最初的研究方案公布后,由于 COVID-19 危机,全面实施 PRIME Parkinson 护理模式的计划被推迟了两年,这也阻碍了研究参与者的招募。
描述由于这些发展情况对研究方案进行了哪些方法学调整。
我们比较了实施 PRIME Parkinson 护理的地区(创新区)与荷兰其他地区(常规护理区)的各种结果。我们使用荷兰几乎所有帕金森病患者的医疗保健索赔数据和一个代表性的 984 名帕金森病患者、566 名护理人员和 192 名医疗保健专业人员的年度问卷的年度数据。自原始方案公布以来,需要进行四项主要的方法学调整。首先,我们将评估期延长了两年。其次,我们纳入了新护理模式实施阶段的年度过程指标。第三,我们引入了一个实时迭代反馈循环,将中期结果反馈给相关利益相关者。第四,我们更新了统计分析计划。
本文稿提供了透明度,说明了如何根据外部影响对评价研究的设计和分析进行调整,包括 COVID-19 危机的爆发。我们的解决方案可以作为在动态环境中评估其他复杂医疗干预措施的模板。