Nana Petroula, Giordano Antonino, Panuccio Giuseppe, Torrealba José I, Rohlffs Fiona, Kölbel Tilo
German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
J Endovasc Ther. 2024 Aug 4:15266028241267753. doi: 10.1177/15266028241267753.
Left subclavian artery (LSA) preservation during thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has been related to low morbidity. This study investigated the incidence of LSA stent compression in patients managed with fenestrated endovascular arch repair (f-Arch) and evaluated the impact of anatomic and technical factors on LSA stent outcomes.
A single-center retrospective analysis of patients managed with single-fenestration devices (Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN, USA) for LSA preservation, between January 1, 2012 and November 30, 2023, was conducted. Anatomic (arch type, bovine arch, distance between the LSA and most proximal bone structure, left common carotid artery and aortic lesion, take-off angle, diameter, thrombus, calcification, dissection, tortuosity) and technical parameters (stent type, diameter, length, relining, post-dilation) were evaluated. Stent compression was any ≥50% stenosis (using center luminal line) of the stent compared with its initial diameter. Clinical outcomes included stroke and upper limb ischemia at 30 days and follow-up. Technical outcomes included stent compression and need for reintervention.
Fifty-four cases were included. Only balloon-expandable covered stents were used, and relining during the index procedure was performed in 18%. No stroke or arm ischemia was recorded. One stent compression was detected at 30 days. During follow-up, no stroke or arm ischemia was diagnosed. Nine cases (18%) presented stent compression, with a mean time of stent-compression diagnosis at 18 months (interquartile range [IQR]=37, range=1-58 months) after the index procedure. Five (56%) underwent secondary relining. Follow-up after reintervention was uneventful. Lower distance to the nearest bone structure (compression group [CG]: 11.7±8.9 mm vs non-compression group [NCG]: 23.0±7.8 mm, p=0.003) and higher tortuosity index (CG: 1.3±0.4 vs NCG: 1.2±0.1, p=0.03) were associated with LSA stent compression.
LSA stent compression in patients managed with f-Arch affected 1 in 5 cases, without clinical consequences. Distance to the nearest bone structure and higher tortuosity were associated with LSA stent compression.
Fenestrated endovascular arch repair for the preservation of the left subclavian artery (LSA) in patients needing landing within the aortic arch has been performed with encouraging outcomes. This analysis showed that LSA stent compression is met in 18% of patients, without though any clinical consequence. Pre-operative anatomic parameters, as lower distance to the nearest bone structure and higher tortuosity index affect negatively LSA stent performance while stent parameters seem to have no impact.
胸主动脉腔内修复术(TEVAR)期间保留左锁骨下动脉(LSA)与低发病率相关。本研究调查了接受开窗血管腔内弓部修复术(f-Arch)治疗的患者中LSA支架受压的发生率,并评估了解剖学和技术因素对LSA支架预后的影响。
对2012年1月1日至2023年11月30日期间使用单开窗装置(美国印第安纳州布卢明顿市库克医疗公司)进行LSA保留治疗的患者进行单中心回顾性分析。评估了解剖学(弓部类型、牛弓、LSA与最近端骨骼结构之间的距离、左颈总动脉和主动脉病变、起始角度、直径、血栓、钙化、夹层、迂曲度)和技术参数(支架类型、直径、长度、内衬、后扩张)。支架受压定义为支架与其初始直径相比出现任何≥50%的狭窄(使用中心腔线)。临床结局包括30天及随访时的中风和上肢缺血。技术结局包括支架受压和再次干预的必要性。
纳入54例病例。仅使用了球囊扩张型覆膜支架,18%的患者在初次手术期间进行了内衬。未记录到中风或手臂缺血事件。在30天时检测到1例支架受压。随访期间,未诊断出中风或手臂缺血。9例(18%)出现支架受压,初次手术后诊断出支架受压的平均时间为18个月(四分位间距[IQR]=37,范围=1 - 58个月)。5例(56%)接受了二次内衬。再次干预后的随访情况良好。与最近骨骼结构的距离较短(受压组[CG]:11.7±8.9毫米 vs 非受压组[NCG]:23.并与LSA支架受压相关。
接受f-Arch治疗的患者中,LSA支架受压影响五分之一的病例,无临床后果。与最近骨骼结构的距离和较高的迂曲度与LSA支架受压相关。
在需要在主动脉弓内着陆的患者中,为保留左锁骨下动脉(LSA)而进行的开窗血管腔内弓部修复术取得了令人鼓舞的结果。本分析表明,18%的患者出现LSA支架受压,但无任何临床后果。术前解剖学参数,如与最近骨骼结构的距离较短和较高的迂曲度指数对LSA支架性能有负面影响,而支架参数似乎没有影响。