Suppr超能文献

转移性乳腺癌的治疗反应及其对生存的影响。

Response to treatment and its influence on survival in metastatic breast cancer.

作者信息

Paterson A H, Cyr M, Szafran O, Lees A W, Hanson J

出版信息

Am J Clin Oncol. 1985 Aug;8(4):283-92. doi: 10.1097/00000421-198508000-00002.

Abstract

The clinical response to first systemic therapy of 381 patients with metastatic breast cancer was assessed; the influence of the category of this first response on eventual survival from diagnosis of first distant metastasis was analyzed. Survival from diagnosis of first distant metastasis was found to be similar whether the patient had a complete response, a partial response, or stable disease; only when progressive disease occurred with first systemic treatment was survival significantly shortened. This similarity in survival whatever the category of response from diagnosis of first distant metastases was found whether the patient received chemotherapy or hormone therapy as first systemic treatment, and whether the patient was premenopausal or postmenopausal; there was some suggestion on analysis of premenopausal patients treated with hormone therapy as first systemic therapy that a complete response conferred a survival advantage, but the numbers were small in this group. When complete responders to first systemic therapy as well as any other subsequent systemic therapy were analyzed for survival from diagnosis of first distant metastasis, again, no survival advantage could be found compared to the other response categories, but the complete response rate was low owing to the unselected nature of this group of study patients. It is concluded that the categories of complete, partial, or stable response to therapy have no great significance in terms of survival; the category of progressive disease to first systemic therapy is, however, associated with a shorter survival in all the analyses performed. We suggest that assessment of a treatment's worth should be based as much on the patient's subjective feeling of well-being as on the magnitude of the tumor response, since with currently available therapies, provided some form of response is obtained, the magnitude of the response does not appear to translate into any major survival advantage. This study points up the disparity between research-oriented criteria of response (survival, response rate, and its magnitude) and patient care criteria of response (survival and quality of life).

摘要

评估了381例转移性乳腺癌患者首次全身治疗的临床反应;分析了首次反应类别对首次远处转移诊断后最终生存的影响。结果发现,无论患者是完全缓解、部分缓解还是病情稳定,首次远处转移诊断后的生存期相似;只有在首次全身治疗出现疾病进展时,生存期才会显著缩短。无论首次远处转移诊断后的反应类别如何,无论患者接受化疗还是激素治疗作为首次全身治疗,也无论患者是绝经前还是绝经后,生存期都相似;对以激素治疗作为首次全身治疗的绝经前患者进行分析时,有迹象表明完全缓解具有生存优势,但该组病例数较少。当分析首次全身治疗以及任何后续全身治疗的完全缓解者从首次远处转移诊断后的生存期时,同样,与其他反应类别相比未发现生存优势,但由于该组研究患者未经过筛选,完全缓解率较低。得出的结论是,治疗的完全、部分或稳定反应类别在生存期方面没有重大意义;然而,在所有进行的分析中,首次全身治疗出现疾病进展与较短的生存期相关。我们建议,评估一种治疗的价值应同样基于患者的主观幸福感以及肿瘤反应的程度,因为就目前可用的治疗方法而言,只要获得某种形式的反应,反应程度似乎并不会转化为任何重大的生存优势。这项研究指出了以研究为导向的反应标准(生存期、反应率及其程度)与患者护理反应标准(生存期和生活质量)之间的差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验