Suppr超能文献

乳腺癌患者全身治疗耐药概述。

Overview of resistance to systemic therapy in patients with breast cancer.

作者信息

Gonzalez-Angulo Ana Maria, Morales-Vasquez Flavia, Hortobagyi Gabriel N

机构信息

Department of Breast Medical Oncology, Unit 424, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, Texas 77030, USA.

出版信息

Adv Exp Med Biol. 2007;608:1-22. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-74039-3_1.

Abstract

Breast cancer is the most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death in American women. It was the second most common cancer in the world in 2002, with more than 1 million new cases. Despite advances in early detection and the understanding of the molecular bases of breast cancer biology, about 30% of patients with early-stage breast cancer have recurrent disease. To offer more effective and less toxic treatment, selecting therapies requires considering the patient and the clinical and molecular characteristics of the tumor. Systemic treatment of breast cancer includes cytotoxic, hormonal, and immunotherapeutic agents. These medications are used in the adjuvant, neoadjuvant, and metastatic settings. In general, systemic agents are active at the beginning of therapy in 90% of primary breast cancers and 50% of metastases. However, after a variable period of time, progression occurs. At that point, resistance to therapy is not only common but expected. Herein we review general mechanisms of drug resistance, including multidrug resistance by P-glycoprotein and the multidrug resistance protein family in association with specific agents and their metabolism, emergence of refractory tumors associated with multiple resistance mechanisms, and resistance factors unique to host-tumor-drug interactions. Important anticancer agents specific to breast cancer are described. Breast cancer is the most common type of cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death in American women. In 2002, 209,995 new cases of breast cancer were registered, and 42,913 patients died of it. In 5 years, the annual prevalence of breast cancer will reach 968,731 cases in the United States. World wide, the problem is just as significant, as breast cancer is the most frequent cancer after nonmelanoma skin cancer, with more than 1 million new cases in 2002 and an expected annual prevalence of more than 4.4 million in 5 years. Breast cancer treatment currently requires the joint efforts of a multidisciplinary team. The alternatives for treatment are constantly expanding. With the use of new effective chemotherapy, hormone therapy, and biological agents and with information regarding more effective ways to integrate systemic therapy, surgery, and radiation therapy, elaborating an appropriate treatment plan is becoming more complex. Developing such a plan should be based on knowledge of the benefits and potential acute and late toxic effects of each of the therapy regimens. Despite advances in early detection and understanding of the molecular bases of breast cancer biology, approximately 30% of all patients with early-stage breast cancer have recurrent disease, which is metastatic in most cases. The rates of local and systemic recurrence vary within different series, but in general, distant recurrences are dominant, strengthening the hypothesis that breast cancer is a systemic disease from presentation. On the other hand, local recurrence may signal a posterior systemic relapse in a considerable number of patients within 2 to 5 years after completion of treatment. To offer better treatment with increased efficacy and low toxicity, selecting therapies based on the patient and the clinical and molecular characteristics of the tumor is necessary. Consideration of these factors should be incorporated in clinical practice after appropriate validation studies are performed to avoid confounding results, making them true prognostic and predictive factors. A prognostic factor is a measurable clinical or biological characteristic associated with a disease-free or overall survival period in the absence of adjuvant therapy, whereas a predictive factor is any measurable characteristic associated with a response or lack of a response to a specific treatment. The main prognostic factors associated with breast cancer are the number of lymph nodes involved, tumor size, histological grade, and hormone receptor status, the first two of which are the basis for the AJCC staging system. The sixth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system allows better prediction of prognosis by stage. However, after determining the stage, histological grade, and hormone receptor status, the tumor can behave in an unexpected manner, and the prognosis can vary. Other prognostic and predictive factors have been studied in an effort to explain this phenomenon, some of which are more relevant than others: HER-2/neu gene amplification and protein expression, expression of other members of the epithelial growth factor receptor family, S phase fraction, DNA ploidy, p53 gene mutations, cyclin E, p27 dysregulation, the presence of tumor cells in the circulation or bone marrow, and perineural and lymphovascular space invasion. Systemic treatment of breast cancer includes the use of cytotoxic, hormonal, and immunotherapeutic agents. All of these agents are used in the adjuvant, neoadjuvant, and metastatic setting. Adjuvant systemic therapy is used in patients after they undergo primary surgical resection of their breast tumor and axillary nodes and who have a significant risk of systemic recurrence. Multiple studies have demonstrated that adjuvant therapy for early-stage breast cancer produces a 23% or greater improvement in disease-free survival and a 15% or greater increase in overall survival rates. Recommendations for the use of adjuvant therapy are based on the individual patient's risk and the balance between absolute benefit and toxicity. Anthracycline-based regimens are preferred, and the addition of taxanes increases the survival rate in patients with lymph node-positive disease. Adjuvant hormone therapy accounts for almost two thirds of the benefit of adjuvant therapy overall in patients with hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer. Tamoxifen is considered the standard of care in premenopausal patients. In comparison, the aromatase inhibitor anastrozole has been proven to be superior to tamoxifen in postmenopausal patients with early-stage breast cancer. The adjuvant use of monoclonal antibodies and targeted therapies other than hormone therapy is being studied. Interestingly, some patients have an early recurrence even though they have a tumor with good prognostic features and at a favorable stage. These recurrences have been explained by the existence of certain cellular characteristics at the molecular level that make the tumor cells resistant to therapy. Selection of resistant cell clones of micrometastatic disease has also been proposed as an explanation for these events. Neoadjuvant systemic therapy, which is the standard of care for patients with locally advanced and inflammatory breast cancer, is becoming more popular. It reduces the tumor volume, thus increasing the possibility of breast conservation, and at the same time allows identification of in vivo tumor sensitivity to different agents. The pathological response to neoadj uvant systemic therapy in the breast and lymph nodes correlates with patient survival. Use of this treatment modality produces survival rates identical to those obtained with the standard adjuvant approach. The rates of pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant systemic therapy vary according to the regimen used, ranging from 6% to 15% with anthracycline-based regimens to almost 30% with the addition of a noncross-resistant agent such as a taxane. In one study, the addition of neoadjuvant trastuzumab in patients with HER-2-positive breast tumors increased the pCR rate to 65%. Primary hormone therapy has also been used in the neoadjuvant systemic setting. Although the pCR rates with this therapy are low, it significantly increases breast conservation. Currently, neoadjuvant systemic therapy is an important tool in not only assessing tumor response to an agent but also studying the mechanisms of action of the agent and its effects at the cellular level. However, no tumor response is observed in some cases despite the use of appropriate therapy. The tumor continues growing during treatment in such cases, a phenomenon called primary resistance to therapy. The use of palliative systemic therapy for metastatic breast cancer is challenging. Five percent of newly diagnosed cases of breast cancer are metastatic, and 30% of treated patients have a systemic recurrence. Once metastatic disease develops, the possibility of a cure is very limited or practically nonexistent. In this heterogeneous group of patients, the 5-year survival rate is 20%, and the median survival duration varies from 12 to 24 months. In this setting, breast cancer has multiple clinical presentations, and the therapy for it should be chosen according to the patient's tumor characteristics, previous treatment, and performance status with the goal of improving survival without compromising quality of life. Treatment resistance is most commonly seen in such patients. They initially may have a response to different agents, but the responses are not sustained, and, in general, the rates of response to subsequent agents are lower. Table 1 summarizes metastatic breast cancer response rates to single-agent systemic therapy.

摘要

乳腺癌是美国女性中最常见的癌症,也是癌症死亡的第二大主要原因。在2002年,它是世界上第二大常见癌症,新发病例超过100万。尽管在早期检测以及对乳腺癌生物学分子基础的认识方面取得了进展,但约30%的早期乳腺癌患者会出现疾病复发。为了提供更有效且毒性更小的治疗,选择治疗方法需要考虑患者以及肿瘤的临床和分子特征。乳腺癌的全身治疗包括细胞毒性、激素和免疫治疗药物。这些药物用于辅助、新辅助和转移性治疗。一般来说,全身药物在治疗开始时对90%的原发性乳腺癌和50%的转移瘤有效。然而,经过一段可变的时间后,病情会进展。此时,对治疗产生耐药不仅常见而且是预期的。在此,我们综述耐药的一般机制,包括P-糖蛋白和多药耐药蛋白家族介导的多药耐药与特定药物及其代谢的关系、与多种耐药机制相关的难治性肿瘤的出现以及宿主-肿瘤-药物相互作用特有的耐药因素。还描述了乳腺癌特有的重要抗癌药物。乳腺癌是美国女性中最常见的癌症类型,也是癌症死亡的第二大主要原因。2002年,登记了209,995例乳腺癌新病例,42,913名患者死于该病。5年内,美国乳腺癌的年患病率将达到968,731例。在全球范围内,这个问题同样严重,因为乳腺癌是仅次于非黑素瘤皮肤癌的最常见癌症,2002年新发病例超过100万,预计5年内年患病率将超过440万。目前,乳腺癌治疗需要多学科团队的共同努力。治疗选择在不断扩大。随着新型有效化疗、激素治疗和生物制剂的使用,以及关于更有效整合全身治疗、手术和放疗方法的信息,制定合适的治疗方案变得更加复杂。制定这样一个方案应基于对每种治疗方案的益处以及潜在的急性和晚期毒性作用的了解。尽管在早期检测以及对乳腺癌生物学分子基础的认识方面取得了进展,但所有早期乳腺癌患者中约30%会出现疾病复发,大多数情况下是转移性的。不同系列中局部和全身复发率有所不同,但一般来说,远处复发占主导,这强化了乳腺癌从发病起就是一种全身性疾病的假说。另一方面,在相当数量的患者中,局部复发可能预示着在治疗完成后2至5年内会出现全身性复发。为了提供疗效更高且毒性更低的更好治疗,根据患者以及肿瘤的临床和分子特征选择治疗方法是必要的。在进行适当的验证研究以避免混淆结果后,应将对这些因素的考虑纳入临床实践,使其成为真正的预后和预测因素。预后因素是指在没有辅助治疗的情况下与无病生存期或总生存期相关的可测量的临床或生物学特征,而预测因素是指与对特定治疗的反应或无反应相关的任何可测量特征。与乳腺癌相关的主要预后因素是受累淋巴结数量、肿瘤大小、组织学分级和激素受体状态,前两项是美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)分期系统的基础。美国癌症联合委员会癌症分期系统第六版能更好地按阶段预测预后。然而,在确定分期、组织学分级和激素受体状态后,肿瘤的表现可能出乎意料,预后也会有所不同。人们研究了其他一些预后和预测因素来解释这种现象,其中一些比其他因素更相关:HER-2/neu基因扩增和蛋白表达、上皮生长因子受体家族其他成员的表达、S期分数、DNA倍体、p53基因突变、细胞周期蛋白E、p27失调、循环或骨髓中肿瘤细胞的存在以及神经周围和淋巴管间隙侵犯。乳腺癌的全身治疗包括使用细胞毒性、激素和免疫治疗药物。所有这些药物都用于辅助、新辅助和转移性治疗。辅助全身治疗用于乳腺癌肿瘤和腋窝淋巴结进行了初次手术切除且有显著全身复发风险的患者。多项研究表明,早期乳腺癌的辅助治疗可使无病生存期提高23%或更多,总生存率提高15%或更多。辅助治疗的使用建议基于个体患者的风险以及绝对益处和毒性之间的平衡。基于蒽环类药物的方案是首选,添加紫杉烷可提高淋巴结阳性疾病患者的生存率。辅助激素治疗在激素受体阳性乳腺癌患者的辅助治疗总体益处中占近三分之二。他莫昔芬被认为是绝经前患者的标准治疗药物。相比之下,芳香化酶抑制剂阿那曲唑已被证明在绝经后早期乳腺癌患者中优于他莫昔芬。正在研究除激素治疗外的单克隆抗体和靶向治疗的辅助使用。有趣的是,一些患者即使肿瘤具有良好的预后特征且处于有利阶段,仍会早期复发。这些复发已通过分子水平上某些使肿瘤细胞对治疗产生耐药的细胞特征的存在来解释。也有人提出选择微转移疾病的耐药细胞克隆来解释这些事件。新辅助全身治疗是局部晚期和炎性乳腺癌患者的标准治疗方法,越来越受欢迎。它可缩小肿瘤体积,从而增加保乳的可能性,同时还能确定肿瘤在体内对不同药物的敏感性。乳腺和淋巴结对新辅助全身治疗的病理反应与患者生存率相关。使用这种治疗方式产生的生存率与标准辅助治疗方法相同。新辅助全身治疗的病理完全缓解(pCR)率因所用方案而异,基于蒽环类药物的方案为6%至15%,添加如紫杉烷等非交叉耐药药物后几乎可达30%。在一项研究中,HER-2阳性乳腺肿瘤患者中添加新辅助曲妥珠单抗可使pCR率提高到65%。新辅助全身治疗中也使用了原发性激素治疗。虽然这种治疗的pCR率较低,但它可显著增加保乳率。目前,新辅助全身治疗不仅是评估肿瘤对药物反应的重要工具,也是研究药物作用机制及其在细胞水平上的效应的重要工具。然而,但在某些情况下,尽管使用了适当的治疗,仍未观察到肿瘤反应。在这种情况下,肿瘤在治疗期间持续生长,这种现象称为原发性治疗耐药。转移性乳腺癌的姑息性全身治疗具有挑战性。5%的新诊断乳腺癌病例为转移性,30%的接受治疗患者会出现全身复发。一旦发生转移性疾病,治愈的可能性非常有限或几乎不存在。在这组异质性患者中,5年生存率为20%,中位生存期为12至24个月。在这种情况下,乳腺癌有多种临床表现,治疗应根据患者的肿瘤特征、既往治疗和身体状况来选择,目标是在不影响生活质量的前提下提高生存率。这类患者中最常见治疗耐药。他们最初可能对不同药物有反应,但反应不持久,而且一般来说,对后续药物的反应率较低。表1总结了转移性乳腺癌对单药全身治疗的反应率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验